Overview

Title

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to provide more loan flexibility to credit unions, to amend the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to expand homeownership access, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to help credit unions give bigger loans to small businesses, up to $100,000 instead of just $50,000, and also make it easier for people to buy homes, by changing some rules.

Summary AI

H.R. 1791 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that aims to make changes to the Federal Credit Union Act and the Federal Home Loan Bank Act. The bill seeks to provide more flexibility for credit unions to give loans, especially by increasing the amount from $50,000 to $100,000 for small businesses. It also focuses on expanding access to homeownership, although specific details on this expansion are not provided in the section. The ultimate goal of the bill is to promote business growth and increase access to home loans.

Published

2025-03-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-03-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1791ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
212
Pages:
2
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 79
Verbs: 17
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 9
Entities: 23

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.27
Average Sentence Length:
23.56
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
13.81

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 1791, titled the "Increasing Credit Union Lending for Business Growth Act," was introduced in the House of Representatives on March 3, 2025, by Mr. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas and Mr. Fitzpatrick. The bill aims to amend existing federal laws to provide more loan flexibility to credit unions and expand homeownership opportunities under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act. Specifically, the legislation proposes increasing the maximum credit limit available to small businesses from $50,000 to $100,000 under the Federal Credit Union Act.

Summary of Significant Issues

One significant issue raised by this bill is the proposed increase in the credit limit for small businesses from $50,000 to $100,000. While this amendment may provide more access to capital for small businesses, there is concern about the lack of detailed justification for this specific increase. The bill does not offer context or analysis of potential risks associated with higher credit exposure, such as the stability of credit unions or the financial system.

Additionally, the bill does not specify criteria for which small businesses will benefit, nor does it set any limits or safeguards to ensure equitable distribution. Without these specifics, there is a risk of favoritism or misuse of the increased credit limits.

Finally, the permanence of this change remains unaddressed. The bill does not specify whether the new credit limits are to be a temporary measure or a permanent change, nor does it outline any mechanisms for reviewing or assessing the impact of these changes.

Impact on the Public

The proposed changes in this bill could have a broad impact on the public, particularly on small businesses. By increasing the credit limit, small businesses may have greater access to funding, potentially fostering growth and entrepreneurship. This could lead to a positive economic impact, including job creation and more robust local economies.

However, the increased credit limits could also raise risks. Without proper oversight and assessment mechanisms, credit unions might face challenges related to increased exposure and financial strain, potentially affecting their stability and the security of their members' deposits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Small Businesses: This bill could positively impact small businesses by providing them with greater access to funding, which is crucial for expansion and operational growth. By raising the credit limit, the bill supports these entities in accessing larger loans that can be used for various business needs, from expansion projects to managing operational costs.

Credit Unions: The impact on credit unions might be mixed. While increased lending opportunities may enhance their relevance and competitiveness in the financial market, it also heightens their credit exposure. The absence of detailed risk assessment and criteria for the disbursement of these loans could result in financial instability for some credit unions.

Consumers/Members of Credit Unions: Members of credit unions may face indirect impacts depending on how their credit union handles the increased lending capacity. If not managed prudently, this could lead to financial strain on the institution, affecting members' savings and loan products' terms.

Overall, while the bill aims to foster small business growth through improved access to credit, it leaves several important questions unanswered. These include the justification for the increased credit limit, specific criteria for beneficiaries, and the mechanisms for reviewing the impact of these changes. Addressing these gaps is crucial for ensuring that the bill achieves its intended benefits without unintended negative consequences.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 1791, titled the “Increasing Credit Union Lending for Business Growth Act,” introduces significant financial changes that impact credit unions and potentially small businesses. One key financial modification is found in Section 2, which proposes an amendment to the Federal Credit Union Act. This amendment involves changing the threshold for loans from $50,000 to $100,000 for small businesses.

Summary of Financial Changes

The primary financial adjustment in the bill is an increase in the loan threshold from $50,000 to $100,000. This essentially doubles the amount credit unions can extend to small businesses, intending to provide more flexibility and support for business growth.

Financial Implications and Related Issues

  1. Increased Credit Exposure: By raising the loan limit, credit unions may face significantly higher credit exposure. However, the text does not provide a detailed justification or risk assessment of this change, which raises questions about the potential impacts on the financial system and the stability of credit unions. Such information is crucial for stakeholders to fully understand the possible ramifications.

  2. Lack of Justification for Increase: The amendment does not explain why increasing the loan limit to $100,000 is necessary. Without detailed reasoning or justification, it is challenging to evaluate whether this financial change will effectively benefit the intended businesses or if there could be potential drawbacks.

  3. Scope and Beneficiaries Undefined: The bill lacks specifications regarding which small businesses can benefit from the increased loan limit. This absence of detail might lead to concerns about favoritism or misuse of the expanded credit capacity. Questions remain about equitable distribution and whether the increased loans will indeed reach the small businesses that need them most.

  4. Temporary or Permanent Change: It is unclear whether this adjustment to the loan limit is intended to be a temporary or permanent change. The text does not provide any mechanism for assessing the impact of this financial policy alteration, which is pertinent to ensuring prudent financial oversight and adaptability in response to economic conditions.

Overall, the financial references in the bill, specifically the increase in the lending threshold, highlight crucial issues related to transparency, risk assessment, and designation of beneficiaries. These aspects are important for ensuring that the financial impacts of the bill align with its objectives of promoting business growth and expanding access to loans, while maintaining financial stability and fairness.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 changing the monetary threshold from $50,000 to $100,000 might significantly increase credit exposure without detailed justification or assessment of potential risks, which is crucial for understanding its impact on the financial system and credit union stability.

  • Section 2 does not provide detailed context or reasoning for why the specific increase to $100,000 is necessary, lacking transparency and making it difficult to assess the potential economic benefits or drawbacks.

  • In Section 2, there is no specification of which small businesses will benefit from this amendment or any applicable limits, raising concerns about potential favoritism, misuse, or an inequitable distribution of increased credit limits.

  • Section 2 fails to mention whether the change in the credit threshold is temporary or permanent and does not outline an assessment mechanism to review the impact, which is critical for ensuring ongoing oversight and financial prudence.

  • Section 1 only provides the short title of the Act without any specific content about the Act's scope, implementation, or stakeholders, creating ambiguity about its potential impacts and whether it aligns with broader legislative goals.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act provides its official title, which is the “Increasing Credit Union Lending for Business Growth Act”.

2. Expanding credit to small businesses Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill proposes an amendment to the Federal Credit Union Act that would increase the maximum credit limit for small businesses from $50,000 to $100,000.

Money References

  • Section 107A(c)(1)(B)(iii) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757a(c)(1)(B)(iii)) is amended by striking “$50,000” and inserting “$100,000”.