Overview
Title
To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 to provide families year-round access to nutrition incentives under the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1782 wants to help families get more fruits and veggies all year round, not just the fresh ones but also frozen ones and beans, by giving them special coupons to buy these healthy foods.
Summary AI
H.R. 1782, also known as the "Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025" or the "SHOPP Act of 2025," aims to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. The bill seeks to provide families with year-round access to nutrition incentives through the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program, specifically by making fresh frozen fruits or vegetables available as part of these incentives. Additionally, it expands the definition of eligible produce to include not just fresh fruits and vegetables but also fresh frozen options and legumes. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Agriculture.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025" (or "SHOPP Act of 2025"), aims to amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008. Its primary objective is to enhance the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program by granting families year-round access to nutrition incentives. Specifically, the act modifies the program to include both fresh and fresh frozen fruits and vegetables and expands the eligible food items to include legumes.
Key Issues in the Bill
Significant issues arise from the bill's lack of detailed guidance regarding implementation and oversight. While expanding the range of foods eligible for incentives, the bill does not outline how these changes will be enforced or monitored. This absence of specificity could lead to challenges in assessing the program's success or addressing potential misuse of the funds.
Additionally, the first section serves as a naming convention for the act without providing detailed provisions. This lack of substantive content means that further information from later sections is necessary to fully understand the bill's impact and potential pitfalls.
Broader Public Impact
On a broad scale, the SHOPP Act could positively influence public health by encouraging additional consumption of fruits, vegetables, and legumes, which are essential components of a nutritious diet. By making it feasible for more families to obtain fresh and frozen produce throughout the year, the legislation could support healthier lifestyle choices nationwide, particularly benefiting those with limited financial resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Families and Individuals: The bill stands to benefit families, especially those who rely on nutritional assistance programs. Year-round access to a wider array of nutritious foods may lead to better health outcomes and reduce the prevalence of diet-related diseases.
Retailers and Farmers: Local farmers and retailers who sell fresh produce might experience increased demand for their products, potentially benefiting economically. However, they might also face implementation challenges if the enhancements require changes in the way they stock or promote their goods.
Government and Oversight Bodies: Without clear implementation strategies and oversight, government agencies tasked with administering these incentives might find it challenging to ensure the integrity and efficacy of the program. This gap could result in program inefficiencies or difficulties in tracking the program’s impact.
In conclusion, while the SHOPP Act of 2025 introduces valuable changes to improve public access to healthy food options, the lack of explicit implementation and oversight measures could limit its effectiveness. The bill's potential to foster healthier eating habits is clear, but achieving its intended outcomes will require careful execution and monitoring.
Issues
Section 1: The short title section provides only the act's name, which offers no substantive content to analyze for potential issues. This lack of detailed provisions or context means that potential impacts or implications cannot be evaluated without further information from subsequent sections.
Section 2: Although this section amends the existing legislation to expand nutrition incentives, it does not provide specific details on the implementation metrics or clear oversight measures. The lack of clarity might lead to challenges in evaluating the program's effectiveness or misuse of the incentives provided.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially named the “Supporting all Healthy Options when Purchasing Produce Act of 2025” or the “SHOPP Act of 2025.”
2. Nutrition incentives under Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill modifies the Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program to include fresh frozen fruits and vegetables as part of its nutrition incentives and expands the eligible foods to encompass legumes.