Overview
Title
An Act To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that educational assistance paid under Department of Veterans Affairs educational assistance programs to an individual who pursued a program or course of education that was suspended or terminated for certain reasons shall not be charged against the entitlement of the individual, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1767 says if a veteran's school does something wrong and the program they are in stops, the veteran doesn't lose any of their school benefits. Plus, the school might have to pay back any money it got from the veteran's benefits until the problem is fixed.
Summary AI
H. R. 1767 aims to protect veterans who use educational benefits from being penalized if their program is stopped due to certain violations by the educational institution. If a school is found to have breached regulations, any educational assistance used by the veteran won't be taken from their entitlement. Additionally, the school will be required to repay the assistance funds and face potential disapproval of its courses until the debt is settled. The bill also makes a small adjustment to housing loan fee dates.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, the "Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act," aims to amend title 38 of the United States Code. Its primary focus is to protect student veterans by ensuring that educational benefits paid under the Department of Veterans Affairs programs are not unjustly charged against their entitlements if a program or course is suspended or terminated for legitimate reasons. The bill also addresses the conduct of educational institutions, particularly concerning advertising, sales, and enrollment practices that violate certain ethical standards. Additionally, it includes an update to the dates mentioned in a section pertaining to housing loan fees for veterans.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill is the lack of specificity in how the final determinations by the Under Secretary for Benefits are made. This ambiguity leaves room for varied interpretations and might lead to inconsistent enforcement. Additionally, the bill does not outline a detailed process or timeframe for appealing these determinations, potentially causing delays.
Another concern is the financial impact on educational institutions required to repay significant amounts of aid. The criteria for determining repayment amounts are not clearly defined, opening up possibilities for subjective assessments. Moreover, the bill does not offer a clear recourse for institutions that disagree with the Under Secretary's decision.
For the housing loan fee section, changing the date without clarifying its purpose or rationale seems insignificant yet confusing, as there is no context provided for stakeholders to understand the necessity of this amendment.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, particularly student veterans, the bill offers reassurance that their educational benefits are safeguarded from being unfairly depleted due to institutional violations. This protection could encourage more veterans to pursue education, confident that their benefits will be preserved in adverse situations.
However, if the process of certification and repayment by educational institutions becomes burdensome, it might deter some schools from participating in veterans' programs, potentially reducing available educational opportunities for veterans.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Student Veterans: Positively, this bill could restore entitlements that were unjustly used, providing veterans with a fair opportunity to complete their education. However, delays due to ambiguous rules and appeals might temporarily affect their educational progress.
Educational Institutions: Schools could face financial and operational strain due to the requirement to repay benefits if found in violation of advertising and enrollment regulations. This might be detrimental, especially for smaller institutions with limited financial capabilities, potentially impacting their ability to offer certain programs or sustain their operations.
Veterans Affairs: The Department needs to establish clear guidelines and processes which are straightforward and transparent, ensuring fair enforcement of the bill. This includes setting up mechanisms for appeal and dispute resolution that are efficient and justifiable.
Legislators and Legal Experts: This bill might prompt lawmakers and legal advisors to push for more precise language and defined processes to avoid misunderstandings and ensure protection for all parties involved.
In summary, while the bill's intentions are noble and protective of student veterans, its implementation could lead to unintended challenges and impacts on a range of stakeholders due to its current vagueness and lack of detailed procedural guidelines.
Issues
Section 2: The bill lacks specifics on how 'final determination' is made by the Under Secretary for Benefits, which introduces ambiguity in enforcement. This uncertainty can lead to inconsistent interpretations and applications of the law, impacting fairness and transparency.
Section 2: The absence of a detailed process or time frame for appeal under subsection (i) can result in delays or inconsistencies, affecting the timely resolution of disputes and fairness in decision-making.
Section 2: The requirement for educational institutions to repay substantial amounts of educational assistance could financially cripple institutions, particularly for minor or unintentional violations, posing a potential threat to their operational viability and to students relying on these institutions.
Section 2: The criteria for determining the repayment amount attributable to a violation are not clearly defined, which may lead to subjective and possibly unfair interpretations that could financially burden education institutions.
Section 2: There is no clear recourse or process outlined for educational institutions that disagree with the Under Secretary's determination, potentially leading to prolonged disputes and lack of resolution for educational providers.
Section 3: The purpose of updating housing loan fee dates without changing the fees themselves is unclear, lacking any provided explanation or rationale, which might cause confusion or suspicion among stakeholders interested in financial or legal aspects of veteran benefits.
The language in both Sections 2 and 3 assumes familiarity with specific legal codes, potentially limiting comprehension and accessibility for individuals who are not versed in legal or veteran affairs, impacting public understanding and legislative transparency.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its name, which is the "Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act."
2. Treatment by Department of Veterans Affairs of educational institutions that violate certain prohibitions on advertising, sales, and enrollment practices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing laws to address educational institutions that break rules about advertising, sales, and enrollment practices. It allows the Department of Veterans Affairs to restore educational benefits to affected students and requires institutions to repay funds if they violate these rules, with the possibility of disapproval of courses until repayment is made.
3. Modification of certain housing loan fees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section modifies the loan fee table in section 3729(b)(2) of title 38 of the United States Code by changing the date from “November 15, 2031” to “November 29, 2031.”