Overview
Title
An Act To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that educational assistance paid under Department of Veterans Affairs educational assistance programs to an individual who pursued a program or course of education that was suspended or terminated for certain reasons shall not be charged against the entitlement of the individual, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1767 is a bill to help veterans keep their school benefits if their classes get stopped for unfair reasons, and it makes schools give back money if they break certain rules, but it doesn't explain some important details clearly.
Summary AI
H. R. 1767, titled the "Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act," aims to protect educational benefits for veterans. The bill amends title 38 of the United States Code to ensure that educational benefits paid under the Department of Veterans Affairs programs are not charged against veterans if their educational programs were unfairly suspended or terminated. It also requires educational institutions that violate certain advertising and enrollment practices to repay the VA for funds received and can lead to disapproval of their programs until repayment is made. Additionally, it modifies the expiration date for certain loan fees under the VA housing loan program.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The "Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act" is a legislative proposal aimed at amending Title 38 of the United States Code. Its central purpose is to protect military veterans who use educational assistance through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Specifically, it seeks to ensure that veterans who pursued a course of education—which was later suspended or terminated due to certain institutional violations—are not penalized by the loss of their educational entitlement benefits. The bill also establishes provisions for holding educational institutions accountable when they violate prohibitions on advertising, sales, and enrollment practices.
Summary of Significant Issues
Lack of Clarity and Defined Processes
One of the notable issues with the bill is the ambiguity surrounding key terms such as "final determination." This vagueness could lead to challenges in enforcement and potential misunderstandings for veterans and educational institutions alike. The bill doesn't outline a clear appeal process or timeline, which might result in inconsistent decisions and unnecessary delays.
Financial Burden on Educational Institutions
By requiring educational institutions to repay the VA for any improperly used educational assistance, the bill aims to deter misconduct. However, this could impose severe financial strain on these institutions, especially if the violations were not intentional or were considered minor. Such financial penalties could ultimately affect the availability and quality of educational opportunities for students.
Legal Complexity
The language used in the bill, particularly in Section 2, is technical and assumes familiarity with specific sections of the United States Code. This complexity might limit the accessibility and comprehension of the bill among veterans who are unfamiliar with legal terminology, potentially hindering their ability to effectively engage with the protections offered.
Unexplained Amendments
Section 3 of the bill involves changing the date for certain housing loan fees from "November 15, 2031" to "November 29, 2031." The rationale behind this amendment is not provided, leaving stakeholders without a clear understanding of its necessity or potential impact.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, this bill represents a step toward enhancing the protection of veterans' educational benefits. Veterans could benefit significantly by not losing their entitlement due to no fault of their own when educational institutions fail to uphold ethical standards. This could encourage more veterans to pursue further education without the fear of losing their hard-earned benefits due to institutional misconduct.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Veterans: The bill is designed to positively impact veterans by safeguarding their educational benefits and ensuring they receive the full value of their entitlement. However, the complexity of the legal language may present challenges in understanding these benefits fully.
Educational Institutions: While the bill's accountability measures may improve institutional compliance, the financial implication of repaying funds could negatively affect institutions, especially if they face significant penalties for minor or unintentional violations. This could potentially reduce educational options for veterans.
Policy Makers and Legal Experts: For policymakers and legal experts, the bill highlights an opportunity to further define and simplify processes and terminology to ensure clearer communication and implementation of the law.
Issues
The bill makes amendments to Title 38 to restore entitlement to veterans whose educational programs were disrupted or terminated due to violations by educational institutions (Section 2). Such provisions highlight a significant policy improving protections for veterans, but the bill lacks clarity on key concepts such as 'final determination,' which could lead to enforcement challenges and uncertainties for both veterans and educational institutions.
The accountability mechanism in Section 2(b) requires educational institutions to repay the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the misused educational assistance. While this is meant to deter misconduct, it can lead to substantial financial burdens on educational institutions, even if the violations were unintentional or minor, potentially affecting educational availability for students.
The absence of a clear appeal process and timeframe for determinations made under subsection (i) of Section 2 can lead to delays and inconsistencies, impacting veterans' ability to resume their education and institutional planning and compliance.
In Section 2, the process for determining the amount to be repaid by an institution isn't clearly defined, involving subjective interpretation, which can lead to disputes and further complicate the enforcement of compliance.
Though the bill aims to restore benefits and improve institutional accountability, the legal and technical language used in Section 2 may limit understanding and accessibility for veterans unfamiliar with specific legal codes.
Section 3 amends the date for certain housing loan fees from 'November 15, 2031' to 'November 29, 2031,' but the rationale for this change is not provided, raising questions about its necessity and potential impacts.
The bill text includes several references to specific sections and titles of the United States Code, such as Section 3696 and Section 3729(b)(2), assuming familiarity with these codes, which may not be the case for all stakeholders, potentially limiting public understanding and engagement.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its name, which is the "Student Veteran Benefit Restoration Act."
2. Treatment by Department of Veterans Affairs of educational institutions that violate certain prohibitions on advertising, sales, and enrollment practices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends existing laws to address educational institutions that break rules about advertising, sales, and enrollment practices. It allows the Department of Veterans Affairs to restore educational benefits to affected students and requires institutions to repay funds if they violate these rules, with the possibility of disapproval of courses until repayment is made.
3. Modification of certain housing loan fees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section modifies the loan fee table in section 3729(b)(2) of title 38 of the United States Code by changing the date from “November 15, 2031” to “November 29, 2031.”