Overview
Title
To direct the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to take certain actions to enhance the representation of the United States and promote United States leadership in communications standards-setting bodies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to help the United States be a leader in how 5G and future wireless technologies are created and used. It tells a special person in charge of communications to get smart people and companies involved in deciding these rules, as long as they are safe to work with.
Summary AI
H.R. 1765, known as the "Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025," requires the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to take steps to increase U.S. representation and leadership in international bodies that set standards for 5G and future wireless networks. The bill directs the Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to encourage participation and offer technical expertise to trustworthy companies and stakeholders, excluding those deemed to pose a national security threat. It also mandates a briefing to relevant congressional committees with a strategy to implement these measures.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The "Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025," known formally as H.R. 1765, mandates the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to take steps to enhance the representation and leadership of the United States in global communications standards-setting bodies. This bill focuses on standards for 5G networks and future wireless communication technologies. It outlines the roles of the Assistant Secretary in encouraging participation from U.S. companies and stakeholders while excluding those deemed "not trusted" due to national security concerns. The bill references notable organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization and the 3rd Generation Partnership Project, which are pivotal in setting global communication standards. Additionally, the Assistant Secretary is required to brief certain Congressional committees with a strategy to execute these tasks.
Significant Issues
One of the major issues the bill faces is the criteria used to exclude certain companies or stakeholders from participation in standards-setting bodies. The term "not trusted" is determined by various external bodies, which could introduce a lack of transparency and accountability. This reliance on entities like the Federal Acquisition Security Council or determinations made under Executive Order No. 13873 could lead to inconsistencies and potential unfair treatment.
Moreover, the bill does not specify how the Assistant Secretary will equitably encourage participation or offer technical expertise, creating concerns of uneven application and potential biases. Adding to this, the Assistant Secretary's authority in determining the trustworthiness of companies is not well defined, which could lead to inconsistent evaluations of national security threats.
The absence of a follow-up mechanism to assess the implementation and effectiveness of the bill's measures raises concern. Without such assessments, the intended goal of strengthening U.S. leadership in communication standards could fall short.
Impact on the Public Broadly
For the public, this bill aims to maintain and enhance U.S. leadership in setting global standards for communications technology, ensuring American competitiveness in the rapidly evolving 5G network landscape and beyond. Such efforts could potentially bolster the nation's economy by ensuring that U.S.-led technologies and standards are adopted worldwide, maintaining the technological edge and potentially fostering innovation and job creation across the nation.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For U.S.-based companies involved in communications technology, the bill could open doors for greater international influence and lead to increased collaboration with global standards bodies. However, the lack of specificity regarding the criteria for trustworthiness might lead to uncertainty for some businesses, particularly those impacted by the “not trusted” designation.
Conversely, foreign companies or those with supply chains involving foreign entities might view the bill with concern due to the possibility of being classified as “not trusted,” potentially limiting their participation and influence in standards-setting processes.
In summary, while the bill aims to strengthen U.S. leadership in global communications technology standards, the vague criteria for exclusion and the lack of specific guidance could introduce challenges that need careful consideration and possibly further legislative refinement to ensure equitable and effective implementation.
Issues
The criteria for determining whether a company or stakeholder is 'not trusted' and therefore excluded from participation in standards-setting bodies is not sufficiently transparent. It relies on references to external determinations and executive orders, such as those by the Federal Acquisition Security Council, the Department of Commerce, and other interagency bodies (Section 2(a)). This could result in a lack of clarity and accountability in how these entities are excluded, which may raise concerns about due process and fair treatment.
There is no clear metric or guideline provided for equitable encouragement and offering of technical expertise to companies and stakeholders (Section 2(a)). This could lead to unequal application or bias in the advancement of U.S. leadership in communications standards-setting.
The Assistant Secretary’s scope of authority and process in determining and applying the 'not trusted' status is not clearly defined (Section 2(a) and Section 2(d)(6)). This ambiguity could result in inconsistencies and potential misuse of power in evaluating national security threats.
The bill does not include any follow-up mechanism or evaluations to assess the effectiveness of the enacted measures and their impact on U.S. leadership in standards-setting bodies (Section 2). Without assessment, there is a risk that the goals of the bill may not be met effectively.
The reliance on specific determinations from other bodies, such as those outlined under Executive Order No. 13873 and section 889(f)(3) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act, could lead to conflicts or overlaps in authority, which may impact how decisions are made regarding company exclusions (Section 2(d)(6)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section specifies that the official name of the law is the "Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025".
2. Representation and leadership of United States in communications standards-setting bodies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines measures to strengthen U.S. representation in global communications standards groups, particularly for 5G networks and beyond. It explains the roles and responsibilities of the Assistant Secretary, identifies relevant standards bodies, and details how companies can participate, provided they do not pose a security threat.