Overview
Title
An Act To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to provide for a high-speed broadband deployment initiative.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to make sure people in places far away from big cities can get really fast internet by giving money to groups that help set it up. It also tries to be fair by looking at who already has some internet and who doesn't, but how exactly it will do this isn't super clear yet.
Summary AI
H.R. 1752, known as the "Eliminating Barriers to Rural Internet Development Grant Eligibility Act" or the "E-BRIDGE Act," aims to amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965. The bill introduces a new initiative to expand high-speed broadband in rural areas by providing grants to eligible recipients, which can include public-private partnerships and consortia. The Secretary will consider geographic diversity and existing levels of broadband service when awarding grants. The bill also includes provisions for the ownership of properties improved with grant funds and outlines procurement rules for goods and services related to broadband projects.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "Eliminating Barriers to Rural Internet Development Grant Eligibility Act" or the "E-BRIDGE Act," seeks to amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to support high-speed broadband deployment initiatives. The legislation aims to authorize the Secretary to provide grants for broadband projects that enhance internet services in various regions, especially focusing on rural and underserved markets. This involves planning, technical assistance, and the development of infrastructure by eligible recipients, which can include public-private partnerships and consortiums. The bill acknowledges the importance of internet connectivity in economic participation and growth.
Summary of Significant Issues
Circular Definition of "Eligible Recipient"
A prominent issue in the bill is the unclear definition of "eligible recipient." The text merely states that an "eligible recipient" is an "eligible recipient," providing no guidance on specific qualifications or criteria needed to qualify. This lack of clarity could create confusion and lead to legal ambiguities concerning who can apply for these grants.
Conflicts of Interest in Procurement
The bill permits entities that had a role in developing a broadband project to compete for related contracts without disqualification. This provision raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and the fairness of the procurement process, as it might give certain entities undue advantages.
Geographic Diversity and Underserved Markets
The criteria for geographic diversity and addressing underserved markets lack specificity, raising concerns about whether funds will be adequately and equitably distributed across different regions. Without detailed guidelines, there is a risk that truly underserved areas might not receive the necessary support.
Transfer of Title to Property
The process outlined for transferring title to property acquired or improved through these projects lacks clear standards, which could lead to favoritism or misuse. This lack of transparency is significant because it involves the stewardship and final ownership of federally funded assets.
Non-Federal Share Credit Allocation
The provision allowing the Secretary to credit non-federal shares based on present value is another area of concern due to the absence of specific guidelines. This could result in financial inconsistencies and misrepresentations in project evaluations, undermining the integrity of the program’s financial management.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact
The bill proposes to expand high-speed broadband access, particularly to those in underserved and rural areas, which could have a profound positive impact on these communities. Improved broadband infrastructure facilitates better access to online resources for education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. However, the issues identified may hinder the effective realization of these benefits.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Rural Communities: These communities stand to gain significantly from increased internet connectivity, which could help bridge the digital divide. However, if the funds are inequitably distributed due to the lack of clear guidelines, the positive impact may not be fully realized.
Public-Private Partnerships and Consortia: These entities could benefit from the available funding to expand broadband infrastructure. Nonetheless, the lack of clarity in grant qualification leaves them uncertain about their eligibility.
Federal Agencies and Oversight Bodies: These entities have a vested interest in ensuring fair and transparent processes. Without proper oversight mechanisms, there is a risk of conflicts of interest and misuse of resources, potentially undermining public trust.
In conclusion, while the E-BRIDGE Act intends to support the expansion of broadband access, addressing the identified issues is crucial to safeguarding the integrity and effectiveness of the program. By clarifying definitions and establishing detailed guidelines, the bill could better achieve its goal of improved internet connectivity for underserved communities.
Issues
The definition of 'eligible recipient' in SEC. 219, section 2(A) is circular and lacks clarity, which could lead to confusion over who qualifies for the grants. This issue is critical as it affects the eligibility of potential applicants and the transparency of the grant allocation process.
The provision in SEC. 219, section 2(b)(5) allows entities involved in the development of a broadband project to also compete for contracts related to that project. This could result in conflicts of interest and unfair competitive advantages, raising ethical concerns about the procurement process.
The process for geographic diversity and the consideration of underserved markets in SEC. 219, section 2(b)(2) lacks specific criteria or metrics, which could lead to uneven distribution of funds, potentially neglecting truly underserved areas. This is significant for ensuring equitable access to broadband services.
The allowance for potentially transferring title to project-related property in SEC. 219, section 2(b)(4) without clear guidelines could lead to misuse or favoritism. This is significant as it affects the stewardship of federally funded property assets.
In SEC. 219, section 2(c), the ability for the Secretary to credit non-Federal shares based on present value without clear guidelines could result in financial misrepresentations and inconsistencies in project evaluations, which is significant for maintaining financial accountability and integrity of the program.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act states that it can be officially called the “Eliminating Barriers to Rural Internet Development Grant Eligibility Act” or simply the “E-BRIDGE Act”.
2. High-speed broadband deployment initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The High-speed Broadband Deployment Initiative is a section of a U.S. law that allows the Secretary to give grants to eligible recipients, such as public-private partnerships and consortia, to improve broadband services. The section includes rules for grant applications, considerations for grant approval such as geographic diversity and existing broadband levels, and stipulations on property rights and contributions related to broadband projects.
219. High-speed broadband deployment initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes an initiative to improve high-speed broadband access through grants for projects by eligible recipients such as public-private partnerships or consortia. It outlines the definition of key terms, application and grant considerations, property and procurement rules, and the determination of the non-federal share of project costs.
3. Applicability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill states that any changes made by this Act will only be relevant to money that is given out starting from the day the Act is officially passed.