Overview

Title

To require the inspector general of the Department of Transportation to conduct an audit on the use of Federal funds by certain entities providing public transportation, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure that city buses and trains are using the money they get wisely by having someone check and report back. It's like having a grown-up make sure you spent your allowance on the right things!

Summary AI

H. R. 171, also known as the “Make Transportation Authorities Accountable and Transparent Act,” is a bill that mandates the inspector general of the Department of Transportation to perform an audit on how certain major transit agencies used federal funds received in recent years. The audit will focus on funds distributed under specific laws, including those related to coronavirus relief. The inspector general must report the findings to Congress within 180 days of the bill's enactment. The goal is to ensure transparency and accountability in the usage of public transportation funding.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr171ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
470
Pages:
3
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 162
Verbs: 31
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 23
Entities: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.48
Average Sentence Length:
27.65
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
16.93

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill 171, introduced in the 119th Congress, proposes to have the inspector general of the Department of Transportation conduct an audit on the use of federal funds allocated to certain public transportation entities. Specifically, it targets transit agencies that received funding under several laws, including those enacted in response to the coronavirus pandemic, over the last five fiscal years. The bill aims to administer these audits to ensure that federal funds are being used appropriately. The results of the audit are to be reported to Congress within 180 days of the bill's enactment.

Summary of Significant Issues

One critical issue identified in the bill is the lack of clarity regarding the criteria for evaluating wasteful spending during the audit. Such ambiguity can lead to varied interpretations, potentially limiting the audit's effectiveness. Additionally, the timeframe described as the "five fiscal years ending before the date of enactment" is vague without a specified end date, which might create confusion about the audit's coverage period.

Another area of concern is the absence of detailed definitions or criteria for what constitutes an "unlinked passenger trip." This term is crucial for correctly identifying the transit agencies subject to the audit, and without a clear definition, there may be challenges in carrying out the audit accurately.

The bill also stipulates a 180-day deadline for the audit report to be submitted to Congress. Depending on the audit's complexity and the volume of data, this timeframe might be insufficient, potentially compromising the audit's thoroughness and reliability.

Moreover, the bill does not specify any actions or penalties if the audit finds improper use of funds. This lack of enforcement measures could weaken the accountability and transparency objectives the bill seeks to promote.

Finally, while the title "Make Transportation Authorities Accountable and Transparent Act" suggests a focus on accountability, the bill lacks detailed guidelines or measures to ensure these principles are upheld.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The general public stands to benefit from this bill if it effectively ensures accountability and transparency in the use of federal funds by public transportation entities. Taxpayers can expect their money to be used more responsibly, leading to potentially enhanced public services. However, without clear criteria and reporting measures, achieving these goals might be difficult.

For public transportation agencies, especially the top five agencies with the most unlinked passenger trips in 2019, the audit could serve as a mechanism to improve financial management and operational integrity. On the other hand, if the criteria for the audit are not clearly defined, these agencies might face undue scrutiny or administrative burdens without a meaningful framework for evaluating their fund usage.

In conclusion, while the bill has the potential to enhance transparency and accountability, several significant issues should be addressed to ensure it effectively meets its goals and positively impacts public transportation and taxpayers. Implementing clearer guidelines, definitions, and consequences for improper use of funds would strengthen the bill's intent and execution.

Issues

  • The bill lacks clarity on the criteria for evaluating 'wasteful spending' in the audit of public transportation coronavirus relief spending, which is a significant issue as it could lead to inconsistent interpretation and impact the effectiveness of the audit. (Section 2)

  • The definition of the time frame '5 fiscal years ending before the date of enactment of this Act' is unclear without specifying an exact end date. This ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings in the scope and period of the audit. (Section 2)

  • There is no detailed explanation or criteria for what constitutes an 'unlinked passenger trip', which may cause confusion and difficulty in accurately identifying and auditing the specified transit agencies. This issue is crucial for the accuracy and scope of the audit. (Section 2)

  • The deadline of 180 days for submitting the audit report to Congress might be insufficient, potentially compromising the quality and thoroughness of the audit if the scope is extensive. This is a significant issue as it affects the audit's reliability and contribution to policy-making. (Section 2)

  • The bill does not include any measures or actions to be taken if improper use of funds are detected, which raises ethical and accountability concerns. This lack of consequences might undermine the purpose of the audit to ensure responsible use of federal funds. (Section 2)

  • The short title of the act, 'Make Transportation Authorities Accountable and Transparent Act', is vague without accompanying detailed measures or guidelines, which could lead to a lack of understanding of the act's intentions and effectiveness in promoting transparency and accountability. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section gives a short title for the Act, stating that it can be called the “Make Transportation Authorities Accountable and Transparent Act.”

2. Inspector General audit on public transportation coronavirus relief spending Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the inspector general of the Department of Transportation to audit how specific transit agencies spent funds provided under certain laws related to public transportation and coronavirus relief over the past five years. Within 180 days of the Act’s enactment, a report on the audit results must be submitted to Congress, and terms like "applicable laws" and "specified transit agency" are defined for clarification.