Overview

Title

To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the accountability of the Office of Special Counsel in enforcing certain provisions of that title vigorously, consistently, and without regard to the political affiliation, career status, or personal characteristics of individuals subject to those provisions, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 1688 is a plan to make sure a special office checks that government workers follow rules fairly and without showing favorites. It wants this office to tell Congress what they find, without sharing too much personal stuff about these workers.

Summary AI

H.R. 1688, titled the “Hatch Act Enforcement Transparency and Accountability Act,” aims to improve the accountability and transparency of the Office of Special Counsel in enforcing the Hatch Act without bias. The bill requires the Office to provide regular reports to Congress about their investigations into political activity violations by federal employees, both career and noncareer. It mandates the publication of anonymized demographic information of individuals involved in these investigations, enhancing public transparency. Additionally, the bill introduces definitions such as "career employee" and "noncareer employee" to clarify who falls under these categories.

Published

2025-02-27
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-27
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1688ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
7
Words:
2,460
Pages:
13
Sentences:
35

Language

Nouns: 739
Verbs: 181
Adjectives: 91
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 63
Entities: 139

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.25
Average Sentence Length:
70.29
Token Entropy:
4.92
Readability (ARI):
37.26

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

This proposed legislation, titled the "Hatch Act Enforcement Transparency and Accountability Act," aims to amend title 5 of the United States Code. Its primary objective is to enhance the accountability of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) in enforcing certain provisions of the Hatch Act. The Hatch Act restricts political activities by federal employees to ensure government operations remain free of partisan influence. This bill seeks to make the OSC's enforcement of the Hatch Act more transparent and consistent, irrespective of an individual's political affiliation, career status, or other personal characteristics. Among other things, the bill introduces definitions of "career employee" and "noncareer employee," mandates periodic reporting to Congress, and requires the publication of anonymized demographic statistics about enforcement actions.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several significant issues. One primary concern is the potential privacy implications associated with publishing detailed demographic statistics of individuals involved in Hatch Act investigations. Despite assurances of anonymization, disclosures might still lead to individuals being identifiable, especially within smaller teams or agencies.

The complexity and lack of clarity in the language used, particularly in defining key terms such as "covered allegation," could result in ambiguity, leading to difficulties in public understanding and legal enforcement. Furthermore, the requirement for the OSC to produce detailed reports and explanations for each decision not to prosecute noncareer employees might strain administrative resources, potentially increasing government spending.

Another notable issue is the bill's provision for maintaining demographic statistics on the OSC's website for a minimum of ten fiscal years, which could necessitate sizable resource allocation for data maintenance and security.

Broad Public Impact

If enacted, this bill could significantly impact how the Hatch Act is enforced, ideally leading to greater accountability and transparency within federal operations. Increased transparency through regular reports and demographic data publication might reassure the public of fair and consistent enforcement, reducing partisan biases in federal agencies. However, the potential for misuse or privacy breaches concerning published demographic information could create public concern and opposition.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Federal Employees: Career and noncareer federal employees could experience increased scrutiny based on the bill's requirement to track and publish demographic information related to complaints. While this might deter inappropriate political behavior, it might also raise concerns about privacy and confidentiality.

Office of Special Counsel: The OSC would face heightened responsibilities, including producing detailed reports and managing extensive demographic data. This could require additional resources, potentially stretching current capacities and budgets.

Congressional Committees: The bill mandates more frequent and detailed reporting to Congress, which could enhance their oversight abilities. However, this influx of information might require additional resources and efforts to effectively analyze and act on the new data.

By explicitly defining new terms and insisting on public transparency, this legislation aims to fortify the relevance and application of the Hatch Act. However, the challenges it proposes, especially concerning privacy and administrative burden, suggest that stakeholders would need to carefully implement and monitor the bill's effects to ensure that its intentions are realized without significant unintended consequences.

Issues

  • The requirement to publish detailed demographic statistics for employees involved in Hatch Act investigations raises significant privacy concerns (Section 5). Even though the information is anonymized, individuals may still be identifiable in smaller teams or agencies, which could lead to breaches of privacy.

  • The overly complex language and lack of clarity in the definition of terms, such as 'covered allegation' and references to other legal sections, could lead to ambiguities and misinterpretations that might impact legal enforcement and comprehension by the public (Sections 2 and 1219a).

  • The requirement for a detailed written explanation for each decision not to prosecute noncareer employees might impose a substantial administrative burden on the Office of Special Counsel, potentially increasing government spending and diverting resources (Section 5).

  • The complex structure and language of section 6, Severability, may pose challenges to understanding its intent and legal implications, particularly regarding which parts of the Act would remain in effect if any provision is deemed unconstitutional.

  • The mandate to maintain demographic data on the official website for at least 10 fiscal years could result in increased costs for data maintenance and security, impacting financial resources (Section 5).

  • The reporting requirements every 180 days may limit timely oversight and action by Congress regarding non-investigations, potentially delaying accountability and oversight by legislators (Section 3).

  • The text raises concerns about confidentiality and privacy due to the level of detail required in the confidential addendum, particularly regarding the names and positions of noncareer employees, which could lead to unintended disclosures (Section 4).

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the law is the “Hatch Act Enforcement Transparency and Accountability Act”.

2. Addition of definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section adds definitions to the U.S. Code, specifying that a "career employee" is a regular government worker, while a "noncareer employee" is someone appointed by the President or serving in certain senior roles, excluding uniformed and Foreign Service members under specific conditions.

1219a. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, the terms "career employee," "covered allegation," and "noncareer employee" are defined. A career employee is a standard government worker, while a noncareer employee holds a role in the executive branch, often appointed directly by the President or serving in a position not filled through merit-based procedures. A covered allegation refers to any claims related to politically prohibited activities.

3. Notifying Congress in the event of a decision not to investigate a noncareer employee Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the law is updated to require the Special Counsel to deliver a written report to specific Congressional committees every 180 days. These reports must include the number of disciplinary complaints received, details of each complaint, and whether the employee involved is a career or noncareer employee.

4. Reporting to Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section updates the reporting requirements for the Special Counsel, requiring an annual report to Congress about allegations against noncareer employees, including the number of allegations, details of investigations, and outcomes of cases. Additionally, it includes a confidential addendum with specific information on allegations not investigated and outcomes, focusing on noncareer employees not appointed by the President with Senate approval.

5. Public transparency in Hatch Act enforcement Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends current law to enhance transparency in the enforcement of the Hatch Act by requiring the Special Counsel to explain decisions not to file complaints against noncareer employees who violate certain rules. It also mandates the tracking and publication of anonymized demographic statistics related to allegations and complaints against both career and noncareer federal employees.

6. Severability Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

If any part of this Act is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the Act will still remain in effect. This means that the invalidity of one section doesn't affect the others.