Overview
Title
To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1674 is a rule that wants to stop people from having or selling big gun magazines that hold more than 15 bullets, but there are some special cases where it's okay, like for police officers.
Summary AI
H.R. 1674, known as the “Keep Americans Safe Act,” aims to regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices. This bill would make it illegal to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess these devices with certain exceptions, such as for law enforcement or national security purposes. It defines a large capacity ammunition feeding device as any magazine or similar device that can hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition. The bill also includes provisions for buy-back programs and penalties for violations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Editorial Commentary
The "Keep Americans Safe Act" is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress aimed at regulating devices that can hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition, commonly referred to as "large capacity ammunition feeding devices." This measure seeks to impose restrictions on the importation, sale, manufacture, transfer, or possession of these devices, with certain exceptions. The aim is to address concerns over gun violence by limiting access to equipment that enables high-volume firing.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill includes several key features. It defines a "large capacity ammunition feeding device" as anything that can hold over 15 rounds, excluding specific devices for .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. The bill establishes a prohibition on their commerce and possession, with exceptions for law enforcement, nuclear security, and authorized testing purposes. Additionally, the bill mandates manufacturing identification marks on these devices and introduces penalties for violations, alongside funding opportunities for buy-back programs to incentivize surrendering these devices.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from the legislation, as highlighted in the analysis:
Ambiguities in Definition: The definition of a "large capacity ammunition feeding device" may invite varying interpretations. Terms like "readily restored, changed, or converted" lack clarity, possibly resulting in legal challenges.
Second Amendment Concerns: The broad prohibition could impact legitimate users, fueling debates around Second Amendment rights. The lack of extensive exemptions might lead to potential legal and political conflicts.
Complexity in Exemption Provisions: The detailed exemption criteria for law enforcement and others could lead to challenges in fair and consistent enforcement, necessitating more precise regulations.
Buy-Back Programs: The bill's authorization of Byrne grants for buy-back initiatives lacks detail on implementation, risking uncertainties regarding transparency, fairness, and funding sources.
Public Impact
The broad aim of reducing access to large capacity ammunition may resonate positively with advocates of stricter gun control, potentially leading to reduced gun-related incidents. However, the impacts on the general public will vary depending on their stance on Second Amendment rights. The cost of enforcement and potential legal disputes arising out of ambiguities could weigh heavily on public resources, depending on judicial interpretations and state-level implementations.
Impact on Stakeholders
Law Enforcement and Security Agencies: These groups stand to benefit from clear exemptions allowing them to maintain high-capacity weapons for duty. This ensures their operational readiness is not compromised.
Gun Owners and Enthusiasts: For this group, the bill could be seen as an overreach affecting legal ownership rights. The lack of clarity in certain definitions may foster resentment and opposition from gun rights organizations.
Manufacturers: The requirement for serial numbers and manufacturing dates introduces compliance burdens that could impact production practices, operational costs, and overall market dynamics.
Government: The responsibility to implement and oversee buy-back programs and enforce new regulations will demand increased resources, administrative efforts, and legal oversight.
The "Keep Americans Safe Act" is positioned at the intersection of public safety and individual rights, a potentially contentious point that will continue to invoke debate across different spheres of society, from legislative chambers to public discourse.
Issues
The broad prohibition on large capacity ammunition feeding devices in Section 3 might potentially impact a wide variety of legitimate users, raising concerns about Second Amendment rights. This could lead to legal and political disputes over the need for more exemptions or provisions to address specific legitimate uses.
The definition of 'large capacity ammunition feeding device' in Section 2 may be ambiguous, particularly the phrase 'readily restored, changed, or converted,' which could be open to interpretation and might need further specification to avoid varying legal interpretations.
The exemption process outlined in Section 3, especially regarding campus law enforcement officers and retired law enforcement, adds complexity and might require more detailed regulations to ensure clear and fair implementation. This complexity could lead to enforcement challenges and unequal treatment allegations.
The provisions for seizure and forfeiture of large capacity ammunition feeding devices in Section 3 could be seen as overly punitive, particularly in cases where possession might be unintentional or due to changes in the law, potentially leading to legal challenges.
The language regarding identification markings for large capacity ammunition feeding devices in Section 3 requires devices to be engraved or cast with a serial number and manufacturing date, but it may be unclear what constitutes 'legibly and conspicuously' in different manufacturing contexts, leading to inconsistencies in compliance.
Section 5 outlines the use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs without providing details on how these programs are expected to be implemented. This could create ambiguities in execution and concerns about transparency or fairness.
The language describing the severability clause in Section 6 is somewhat complex and might be difficult for laypersons to fully understand. The section does not specify which parts of the act may be most likely to be held unconstitutional, leaving interpretation open.
The section regarding penalties in Section 4 does not specify the exact nature or severity of penalties, which could lead to variations in enforcement and legal challenges.
There is no explicit discussion about the source of funding or budget limitations for implementing and enforcing the bill, particularly concerning the buy-back programs mentioned in Section 5, which could lead to financial management issues.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill specifies that the official short title of the legislation is the “Keep Americans Safe Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends U.S. law to define "large capacity ammunition feeding device" as any magazine or similar device capable of holding more than 15 rounds of ammunition, except if it’s a .22 caliber rimfire tube device. It also clarifies that "qualified law enforcement officer" refers to the definition in another section of the law.
3. Restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines updates to U.S. law, making it illegal to import, sell, manufacture, transfer, or possess large capacity ammunition feeding devices, with specific exceptions for law enforcement, nuclear security, and testing purposes. Additionally, new devices must have identification markings, and any found to be in violation can be seized and forfeited.
4. Penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends part of the United States Code to include a new reference, changing it from “or (q)” to “(q), or (v)” in the list of penalties under section 924(a)(1)(B).
5. Use of Byrne grants for buy-back programs for large capacity ammunition feeding devices Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 allows government funds to be used for buy-back programs. These programs will compensate individuals who turn in large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
6. Severability Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If any part of this Act is found to be unconstitutional, the rest of the Act and its amendments still remain valid and enforceable.