Overview
Title
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to improve mental health services for students, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure kids in schools can get help if they're feeling sad or worried, by letting schools use money to improve ways to help kids feel better, like talking to helpers on a computer or learning how to help friends in an emergency.
Summary AI
H.R. 1649, titled the "Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act," proposes changes to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The bill aims to enhance mental health services for students by allowing funds to be used for improving mental health services, which may include mental health first aid, emergency planning, agreements with local health agencies, and telehealth services. It also includes provisions for using technology to support mental health services, ensuring that local educational agencies can incorporate these practices into their funding applications.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled as the "Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act," primarily seeks to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The amendments focus on enhancing mental health services for students in elementary and secondary schools. Key elements of the bill include the improvement of mental health services through the identification and dissemination of best practices, establishment of emergency planning, forming agreements with local health agencies, and the incorporation of telehealth services. Additionally, the bill allows local educational agencies to use funds for these mental health activities and advocates for employing technology to support mental health services while providing certain exceptions in funding allocations related to technology infrastructure.
Significant Issues
There are several potential issues with the bill that deserve attention. Firstly, the lack of specific criteria for selecting local health agencies and private mental health institutions raises concerns regarding favoritism and fair treatment. The vague language around "disseminating best practices" might create confusion about what constitutes best practices and who is accountable for implementing them. Furthermore, allowing funds for "emergency planning" without clear guidelines could result in varying interpretations and potential misuse of resources. Similarly, the inclusion of telehealth services needs clearer operational guidelines, as its broad nature might lead to inconsistent applications. The provision allowing exceptions for technology infrastructure also requires clarification to prevent possible loopholes or misuse of funds.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill promises to increase access to mental health services for students, potentially addressing a critical gap in the educational system. With improved mental health services, students may benefit from better support for their emotional and psychological well-being, leading to improved academic performance and overall quality of life. However, vague language and lack of guidelines could result in uneven implementation across different regions, negatively impacting the uniformity and effectiveness of the services provided.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Students and Families: These provisions could be advantageous for students and their families by providing better access to mental health support. This could lead to early intervention, reducing the stigma associated with mental health issues, and potentially improving students' academic outcomes and personal development.
Local Educational Agencies: The agencies might face challenges due to vague guidelines, as it could lead to difficulties in interpreting and implementing the provisions consistently. This might necessitate additional administrative effort to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
Mental Health Institutions: The bill could offer opportunities for local health agencies, both public and private, to collaborate with schools in delivering mental health services. However, unclear criteria for selecting partner organizations might result in uneven opportunities and competition among providers.
Technology Providers: There might be an increase in demand for technology that can support mental health services, providing growth opportunities for companies in the telehealth sector. Nonetheless, technology providers would benefit from clearer guidelines to avoid misinterpretation or misallocation of funds.
Overall, while the bill has the potential to improve mental health services for students significantly, its success hinges on the implementation of clear guidelines and defined criteria across all levels involved.
Issues
The bill text in Section 2 does not specify any specific criteria for selecting local health agencies or private mental health institutions, leading to potential preferential treatment or favoritism, which poses both ethical and legal challenges.
The phrase 'disseminating best practices for mental health first aid' in Section 2 is vague and could create confusion or misinterpretation regarding what constitutes 'best practices' and who is responsible for dissemination, impacting its effectiveness and proper implementation.
Allowing funds for 'emergency planning' without clearly defined criteria or guidelines in Section 2 can lead to broad interpretations, potentially resulting in wasteful spending, which is a financial concern.
The absence of clear boundaries or operational guidelines for the use of funds for 'telehealth services' in Section 2 introduces risks of disparate interpretations, contributing to potential misuse or ineffective deployment of resources.
The clause in Section 2 allowing exceptions for technology infrastructure used for mental health services is ambiguous, which could lead to loopholes or misuse of funds, a significant financial and ethical issue.
Certain amendments in Section 2 heavily rely on cross-references to other sections of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, which can cause difficulty for stakeholders to comprehend the direct implications without additional context, posing legal and informational transparency challenges.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states its short title, which is "Expanding Student Access to Mental Health Services Act."
2. Supporting mental health Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 aim to enhance mental health services for students by encouraging the use of best practices, emergency planning, partnerships with health agencies, and telehealth. Additionally, local agencies may use funds for mental health, and technology can be employed to support these services, with specific exceptions to the usual limitations when it's also used for mental health purposes.