Overview
Title
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the period of eligibility for Federal Pell Grants, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Pell to Grad Act" wants to let students get money for college longer, even after they finish their first degree, so they can keep learning new things. It changes the rules so students can get this help for more years if they haven't used it all up yet.
Summary AI
H.R. 1635, known as the "Pell to Grad Act," proposes changes to the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the eligibility period for receiving Federal Pell Grants. The bill allows students who have completed their undergraduate studies to continue receiving Pell Grants for their first postbaccalaureate course of study if they previously received the grant for less than 16 semesters. It also increases the maximum number of semesters a student can receive these grants from 12 to 16.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, identified as H.R. 1635, aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 with a specific focus on increasing the period during which students can qualify for Federal Pell Grants. Dubbed the "Pell to Grad Act," this legislation seeks to broaden the educational horizons for students by allowing Pell Grants to cover not just undergraduate courses, but also some postbaccalaureate coursework. The shift includes expanding the eligibility limit from 12 to 16 semesters to accommodate these additional studies.
General Summary
The bill focuses on expanding the duration for which students can receive Federal Pell Grants. Traditionally, Pell Grants have been available primarily to undergraduates. This proposal introduces eligibility for students pursuing certain postbaccalaureate studies if they have previously received Pell Grants. Additionally, it extends the cap on the maximum number of semesters a student can benefit from these grants from 12 to 16.
Summary of Significant Issues
The core issues revolve around the financial implications and practicality of the bill. By extending the eligibility to include some postgraduate studies and increasing the grant period to 16 semesters, there could be a significant increase in demand for these grants. There is no mention of how this expanded demand will be funded, raising concerns about future budget allocations. Furthermore, there is potential for misuse if students repeatedly enroll in noncredit or remedial courses since these do not count towards the eligibility period. The legislative text also could benefit from simplification to reduce potential confusion regarding eligibility conditions.
Broad Public Impact
In broad terms, the bill aims to provide greater access to education by extending Pell Grant eligibility. This could mean more students, particularly those unable to afford higher education, would be able to pursue further studies and enhance their qualifications. This could lead to a more educated workforce, potentially benefiting the economy at large.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For students, particularly those from lower-income backgrounds, this bill represents an opportunity to pursue and complete higher education without the imperative financial burden. It acknowledges the evolving educational needs by including postgraduate studies, thereby promoting lifelong learning.
However, educational institutions might face increased administrative challenges managing an expanded Pell Grant program. It's also conceivable that if funding does not increase alongside eligibility, some students might find grant funds stretched too thinly to meet their needs.
Overall, while the bill proposes positive changes by extending opportunities, it raises substantial questions about practical implementation and funding that need to be addressed to ensure it achieves its intended goals without unintended negative consequences.
Issues
The amendment to allow the period during which a student can receive Federal Pell Grants to include postbaccalaureate studies (Section 2, subsection (d)(1)(B)) may significantly impact the overall budget or allocation of resources for Pell Grants. This raises financial feasibility questions, as increased eligibility periods could surge grant demands without clear corresponding funding adjustments.
The change from '12' to '16' semesters in Section 2, paragraph (5)(A) potentially extends the funding periods, which could result in increased grant spending. There is no clarity on how this extended funding will be managed or what new funding sources might be required to support this increase.
The potential for wasteful spending if students enroll repeatedly in noncredit or remedial coursework is a concern since these periods are excluded from the eligibility count (Section 2, subsection (d)(1)(A)). This can lead to exploiting the system, diverting funds away from students who complete credit-earning programs promptly.
The text of this amendment is somewhat repetitive concerning student eligibility conditions, which might create confusion. A more concise and straightforward outline could improve public understanding and ensure efficient implementation (Section 2).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section gives the official short title of the legislation as the “Pell to Grad Act.”
2. Period of eligibility for grants Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act allows students to receive Federal Pell Grants for the time needed to complete their first undergraduate degree, including some postbaccalaureate studies if they had already received a Pell Grant for at least one semester but fewer than 16 semesters. Additionally, it changes the maximum number of semesters a student can receive Pell Grants from 12 to 16.