Overview
Title
To amend title 17, United States Code, to reaffirm the importance of, and include requirements for, works incorporated by reference into law, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1631 is about making important rules and codes that everyone needs to follow easier to read online for free, while also making sure the people who create these codes can still earn money from big businesses.
Summary AI
H. R. 1631, also known as the “Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes Act” or the “Pro Codes Act,” seeks to adjust copyright laws to support public access to technical and voluntary consensus standards that are incorporated into U.S. laws and regulations. The bill acknowledges the importance of standards development organizations and intends for these standards to remain accessible to the public at no monetary cost online, supported by licensing and sales to industries. This Act mandates multiple studies by the Comptroller General to examine the impact on different communities and sectors, including costs to governments, access issues for disadvantaged communities, effects on small businesses, and potential First Amendment rights implications. The studies aim to assess and propose improvements to balance public access with the financial interests of standards development organizations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes Act" or the "Pro Codes Act," aims to amend U.S. copyright law to ensure technical standards incorporated by reference into laws can remain under copyright protection. The bill supports the continued creation and updating of these standards by requiring that organizations provide public access to the standards online, without charge. It mandates a series of studies to explore the impact of these changes on various aspects of society and government, with reports to be submitted to Congress.
Significant Issues
A central issue with the bill is balancing public accessibility with copyright protection. While the bill requires that standards are publicly accessible online, it does not clearly define the management of potential conflicts between open access and copyright law, which might lead to legal challenges. Another critical concern is the requirement for numerous Government Accountability Office (GAO) studies. This could lead to significant government spending without clear necessity or tangible benefits. Privacy and accessibility concerns are also highlighted, with vague terms like "affirmative and express consent" potentially impacting individual privacy.
The bill could also inadvertently favor established Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) with the resources to comply with extensive requirements, potentially disadvantaging smaller or newer entities. There is also a lack of specific guidance on reasonable executive compensation within SDOs, which could result in inconsistent practices. Issues around vague definitions could lead to uneven application and compliance challenges. Furthermore, the bill’s impact on disadvantaged communities could worsen existing inequalities if technical standards necessary for legal rights are restricted.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill promises more accessible legal standards, which could enhance transparency and understanding of legal obligations. However, there are concerns that the promised access could be hindered by privacy and technical barriers such as the creation of accounts or agreeing to terms of service.
The variety of mandated studies aims to ensure that any issues arising from the bill's implementation are addressed. However, these studies could result in increased government spending and administrative complexity, potentially straining already limited resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For governments, particularly at smaller or local levels, the bill could impose financial burdens related to acquiring standards if costs are not effectively managed. Businesses, especially small ones, may face difficulties navigating new compliance obligations, impacting their competitiveness.
Established SDOs may benefit from the bill’s support of copyright protection, potentially securing revenue streams. However, the requirements to make standards publicly accessible without charge could challenge their traditional revenue models, necessitating a shift in business strategies. Disadvantaged communities could face increased barriers if access to necessary legal information is not adequately provided, exacerbating existing disparities.
Overall, this legislation attempts to strike a balance between public access to essential standards and protecting the financial viability of organizations that create these standards. While it has potential benefits, there are significant concerns regarding implementation and the equitable distribution of its advantages.
Issues
The balance between public access and copyright protection is not clearly managed, which could lead to ambiguity and legal challenges, as noted in Section 2. This issue is significant because it affects how openly public can access laws and standards incorporated into regulations, potentially impacting democratic transparency and accountability.
The requirement for numerous GAO studies in Section 3 might lead to excessive spending without clear justification of need. This issue can strain resources and delay other essential evaluations, posing potential financial and administrative burdens on the government.
Section 3 and Section 123 raise privacy and accessibility concerns regarding the online availability of standards. The use of terms like 'affirmative and express consent' and the inclusion of standards behind account creations and terms of service are vague, which could affect individual privacy and accessibility.
The potential bias favoring established Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) in Section 123 may disadvantage smaller or newer organizations unable to meet extensive requirements. This raises ethical concerns about equity and fairness in innovation and market competition.
The lack of specific guidance on 'reasonable limits' to executive compensation within SDOs, as required by studies in Section 3, could lead to inconsistent and potentially exploitative compensation practices, raising financial, ethical, and regulatory concerns.
Vague definitions such as 'reasonably accessible manner' and 'within a reasonable period of time' as found in Section 123 could lead to inconsistent applications of accessibility requirements, affecting compliance and potentially creating an uneven legal and regulatory landscape.
The bill's potential impact on historically disadvantaged communities, outlined in Section 3, could exacerbate existing inequalities by limiting access to technical standards necessary for asserting legal rights, raising ethical and social justice concerns.
Section 4 lacks clear metrics for assessing the 'cost-effectiveness' of accessing standards incorporated by reference, which could lead to subjective interpretations and insufficient evaluations, posing potential financial concerns for governments.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act establishes its name, which is "Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes Act" or simply the "Pro Codes Act".
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress recognizes the importance of private organizations that create technical standards because they help improve safety, innovation, and commerce. These standards are often used in laws without costing taxpayers, and while ensuring fair access, their creation is supported by copyright protection and the sale of standards.
3. Works incorporated by reference into law Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends U.S. copyright law to clarify that technical standards incorporated by law can retain copyright protection if they are available online for free and in an accessible format. It also mandates studies to assess the impact of this amendment on communities, costs, consumers, digital privacy, access to law, and more, with reports to be submitted to Congress within specified timelines.
123. Works incorporated by reference into law Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In SEC. 123, the bill outlines rules for using standards in laws and regulations, stating that even if a standard is referenced rather than copied directly, it still retains its copyright if the organization responsible makes it freely accessible online. It also defines terms like "Circular A–119," "standard," and "standards development organization," and explains what "publicly accessible online" means, ensuring that users can view resources without cost and that their personal information is protected.
4. Study of standards cost to governments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Comptroller General of the United States is tasked with conducting a study on the costs federal, state, and local governments face when accessing standards incorporated into law. The study aims to assess these costs' impacts on government budgets, especially for smaller municipalities, and suggest potential solutions to alleviate any financial difficulties identified, with a report due to Congress within two years.