Overview
Title
To amend title 5, United States Code, to terminate pensions for Members of Congress, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The CLEAN Public Service Act aims to stop giving new retirement money to Congress members, but they can still save for retirement on their own. However, the Vice President won't have these changes apply to them.
Summary AI
The H.R. 159, also known as the “Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Public Service Act” or the “CLEAN Public Service Act”, proposes ending future pension benefits for Members of Congress. This bill amends sections of title 5 of the U.S. Code to prevent any new government contributions or payroll deductions for congressional retirement plans. Existing rights and benefits accrued before the enactment of this bill will not be affected, and Members of Congress will still be able to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan. The Vice President is explicitly excluded from these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Public Service Act" or the "CLEAN Public Service Act," aims to make significant changes to the retirement benefits for Members of Congress. Specifically, it seeks to terminate any future retirement benefits under the existing Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). The bill states that these changes will take effect 90 days after the law is enacted. While it ends future government contributions and deductions for retirement plans, it safeguards benefits accrued before the enactment date. Notably, Members will still have the right to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, a separate retirement savings plan available to federal employees, including Members of Congress.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill includes several key issues, starting with the exclusion of the Vice President from the definition of "Member." This raises questions about potential inequity, as the rationale for this exclusion isn't addressed. The lack of clear information on the fiscal impact of these changes also stands out; understanding potential savings or costs is critical for transparency. Moreover, the use of complex legal language and technical references makes the bill difficult for the general public to understand. Another concern is the ambiguity around the enactment date, which could lead to confusion for those affected by the changes. Additionally, the provision for refunds to Members with less than five years of service could be perceived as preferential, leaving doubt about the fairness of the treatment between different groups of Members.
Impacts on the General Public
For the general public, the bill's intent to terminate future congressional pensions may be seen as a step towards reducing perceived governmental privilege and aligning Members of Congress with the retirement options commonly available to ordinary citizens. This could potentially enhance public trust in the legislative body by addressing concerns over excessive benefits. However, the complexity of the language could hinder public understanding and engagement, making it challenging for citizens to form informed opinions about how this legislative change precisely affects governance and public finance.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Members of Congress would directly feel the impacts of this bill. Those who rely on or expect future government retirement contributions might need to seek additional financial planning or resources to prepare for retirement. Those with less than five years of service may benefit from a refund option, although its fairness to longer-serving Members might be questioned.
Government Administrators, particularly the Office of Personnel Management and entities responsible for the Thrift Savings Plan, would need to navigate the division and execution of new regulatory responsibilities carefully. Ambiguity in roles might lead to administrative challenges, potentially delaying the implementation of the bill's provisions.
In summary, while the bill directly targets Members of Congress, its broader implications encompass perceived government accountability and fairness, with nuanced financial and administrative effects that could impact various stakeholders differently. Clarifying specific aspects of the bill would help ensure a smoother transition and greater public and stakeholder satisfaction.
Issues
The exclusion of the Vice President from the definition of 'Member' (Sections 8335a and 8425a) might raise concerns about potential inequity or unequal treatment compared to other Members of Congress. This distinction is not explained, potentially leading to confusion about the rationale for this differential treatment.
The lack of specificity concerning the fiscal impacts or savings from terminating pensions for Members of Congress (Section 2) may raise questions about transparency and accountability. Providing this information could help the public understand the financial implications of this legislation.
The ambiguity regarding the date of enactment (Sections 8335a and 8425a) could lead to confusion about the timeline for terminating retirement coverage. This lack of clarity might result in administrative challenges and uncertainty for those affected.
The complexity of the legal language used in the bill, particularly in Sections 8335a and 8425a, may hinder the public's understanding of its provisions. This issue highlights the need for more accessible language to ensure broader public comprehension and engagement.
The provisions for refunds in Section 8425a may appear preferential to Members with less than 5 years of service, without clarifying how this affects Members with longer service. This could be seen as inequitable treatment and might spark public debate about fairness.
The references to external sections and existing laws without sufficient context or explanation (Sections 8335a and 8425a) could contribute to confusion or misinterpretation of the bill's intentions and effects among those without access to or familiarity with these documents.
The division of regulatory authority between the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the Executive Director for matters relating to the Thrift Savings Plan (Sections 8335a and 8425a) may lead to administrative confusion or inefficiencies. Clarity about their respective roles and responsibilities is needed to prevent potential conflicts or overlaps.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the Act can be referred to as the “Citizen Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform of Public Service Act” or the “CLEAN Public Service Act.”
2. Termination of further retirement benefits for Members of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes to end future retirement benefits for Members of Congress under both the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees Retirement System, starting 90 days after the law is enacted. Existing benefits remain intact, and Members can still participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, but this change does not apply to the Vice President.
8335a. Termination of further retirement coverage of Members of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Members of Congress will not receive any further retirement coverage or government contributions to their retirement fund starting 90 days after this law is enacted. This change does not affect their past retirement benefits or their ability to participate in the Thrift Savings Plan, and regulations for this change will be made by appropriate authorities.
8425a. Termination of further retirement coverage of Members of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section mandates that Members of Congress, both current and future, will no longer have retirement coverage under a specified chapter as of 90 days after enactment, although it preserves any prior accrued benefits and allows continued participation in the Thrift Savings Plan. It excludes the Vice President and requires necessary regulations for implementation, including provisions for refunding contributions to Members with less than five years of service.