Overview

Title

To make improvements to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 147 is about making sure a special team in the government, called FinCEN, which watches out for money crime, tells the big bosses what they're doing. It also wants them to share some papers with everyone, and there's a new rule to talk more with small businesses too.

Summary AI

H.R. 147, titled the “FinCEN Oversight and Accountability Act of 2025,” aims to enhance the oversight and transparency of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The bill mandates the Secretary of the Treasury to keep Congress informed about FinCEN's activities and report any unlawful conduct. It also requires the disclosure of specific documents to both Congress and the public, while exempting certain sensitive sections. Additionally, the bill amends existing laws to extend the term for FinCEN Director’s testimony requirements from 5 to 10 years, and establishes a small business working group to improve FinCEN's collaboration with the small business community.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr147ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
5
Words:
933
Pages:
5
Sentences:
34

Language

Nouns: 319
Verbs: 61
Adjectives: 24
Adverbs: 9
Numbers: 42
Entities: 89

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.31
Average Sentence Length:
27.44
Token Entropy:
4.84
Readability (ARI):
15.91

AnalysisAI

The bill titled "FinCEN Oversight and Accountability Act of 2025" aims to enhance the functioning and accountability of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The proposed legislation seeks to establish improved oversight, increase transparency, and foster interaction with small businesses. It is divided into three main sections: Congressional Oversight, FinCEN Accountability, and the Small Business Working Group. These sections outline different ways in which FinCEN and its actions should be monitored and made more transparent, while also facilitating dialogue with the small business community.

General Summary of the Bill

The FinCEN Oversight and Accountability Act is structured to ensure that the activities of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network are transparent and accountable to Congress and the public. It mandates the Secretary of the Treasury to keep certain Congressional committees informed about FinCEN's activities and report any unlawful happenings. The bill also requires controlling documents to be disclosed both to Congress and the public, with certain exemptions. Additionally, it calls for the establishment of annual working groups to provide support and guidance for small businesses.

Summary of Significant Issues

There are several key issues with the bill that may impact its effectiveness:

  • Reporting Frequency and Clarity: The bill does not clearly specify how often reports need to be submitted to Congress, nor does it define crucial terms like "significant anticipated activity" or "unlawful activity," potentially leading to vagueness in enforcement and reporting practices.
  • Public Accessibility and Transparency: The requirements for making controlling documents available to the public lack stringent guidelines on which parts can be exempted, potentially limiting transparency. Moreover, there is no clear method outlined for how these documents should be shared with the public, affecting accessibility.
  • Small Business Working Groups: Although the bill suggests forming annual small business working groups, it inadequately addresses logistical aspects such as participant selection and funding, which might hinder effective implementation.
  • Longer Testimony Term: Extending the period for testimony from 5 to 10 years introduces questions about the reasoning behind such a change, as it isn't thoroughly explained within the bill, leaving its necessity open to debate.

Impact on the Public

The public stands to benefit from this bill as it promises increased transparency and accountability of FinCEN's activities, which are crucial for regulating financial crimes. Having access to pertinent financial documents and updates can improve public trust and engagement. Furthermore, fostering dialogue between FinCEN and small businesses may aid in the smoother implementation of compliance practices.

However, the lack of clarity in reporting frequency and the exemption criteria for document disclosure could dilute these benefits. If substantial sections of documents remain undisclosed, it would undermine the bill's intent to foster transparency and trust.

Impact on Stakeholders

For Congress: Improved oversight could enhance Congress's ability to monitor FinCEN and rectify any emerging issues more swiftly. However, the absence of penalties for non-compliance might limit their effectiveness in holding FinCEN accountable.

For Small Businesses: The formation of working groups implies greater support and guidance, potentially helping small businesses comply with financial regulations. Yet, the lack of funding could hamper these groups' operations, reducing their effectiveness.

For the Treasury Department: As the primary body enforcing the bill, the Treasury might face challenges in meeting the undefined standards of "prompt" document disclosure and managing increased oversight without additional resources.

Overall, while the intent behind the bill is aligned with improving financial oversight and fostering cooperation between regulatory bodies and the business community, the execution faces hurdles that need addressing to ensure its efficacy and impact.

Issues

  • The section 301 provision for annual small business working groups does not provide clarity on the logistics such as the composition, selection criteria for participants, or whether participation is mandatory or voluntary, potentially leading to inefficiencies and limited effectiveness due to lack of funding or resources, as there are no appropriations specified to support these amendments.

  • Section 101 lacks a specified time frame for the Secretary of the Treasury to report activities to Congress, which could result in inconsistent and potentially unreliable reporting intervals. Additionally, there are no definitions for 'significant anticipated activity' or 'unlawful activity,' leading to ambiguity in what must be reported.

  • Section 201's requirement for public disclosure of controlling documents might be limited by the lack of specific details on what portions could be exempted under section 552(b) and how documents should be disseminated (e.g., online or upon request), impacting transparency and public accessibility.

  • Section 202 changes the term from '5 years' to '10 years' without sufficient explanation or justification, which might raise concerns about the necessity and implications of this extension on oversight and accountability.

  • Section 101 does not mention any consequences for failure to report or act on unlawful activities, potentially resulting in noncompliance without accountability, which may affect the legislation's effectiveness in ensuring oversight and transparency.

  • Section 201's use of the term 'reasonably segregable' is vague and opens the door to differing interpretations that could affect the mandate for transparency by excluding key portions of documents.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text describes the FinCEN Oversight and Accountability Act of 2025, which includes a short title and a table of contents organized into three main titles: Congressional Oversight, FinCEN Accountability, and the Small Business Working Group. Each title contains sections detailing specific responsibilities and actions, such as providing information for Congress, ensuring transparency, and establishing groups to support small businesses.

101. Information for constitutional functions of Congress Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of the Treasury to keep certain Congressional committees updated on the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's activities and to report any unlawful activity and corrective measures planned or taken.

201. Transparency with controlling documents Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of the Treasury to provide Congress and the public with access to certain important documents, known as "controlling documents," related to financial crime enforcement, with some exceptions for sensitive information. It also defines what the "Bank Secrecy Act" includes, referring to specific laws that govern financial regulations.

202. Testimony by the Director of FinCEN Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill changes the law so that the term for something related to the Director of FinCEN's testimony is extended from 5 years to 10 years.

301. Small Business Working Groups Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends the United States Code to require that each year there be a working group for small businesses to discuss the effectiveness of beneficial ownership information, encourage collaboration between FinCEN and small businesses, and offer guidance on beneficial ownership reporting. No additional funds are to be allocated for these amendments.