Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise taxes on wagering.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1440 is a plan to stop the special tax that people have to pay when they make bets or gamble over the internet. If this happens, there might be less money for the government to use for things like schools or parks.
Summary AI
H.R. 1440 proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that seeks to eliminate excise taxes on wagering activities. The bill, named the "Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025," intends to remove Chapter 35, which imposes taxes on wagering. This change would take effect for taxable years starting after December 31, 2024. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Ms. Titus and co-sponsored by several other representatives.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025," introduced in the House of Representatives, aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by repealing the excise taxes on wagering. This legislation would remove Chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes taxes on wagering activities, with changes effective for taxable years starting after December 31, 2024.
General Summary of the Bill
This proposed legislation seeks to eliminate the existing federal excise taxes that apply to wagering activities. The repeal would mean that businesses and individuals engaging in wagering would no longer be subject to these specific taxes starting from the year 2025.
Summary of Significant Issues
One notable issue with this bill is the potential loss of government revenue, which is currently generated by the excise taxes on wagering. The bill does not outline how this revenue shortfall might be compensated, raising concerns about its impact on the federal budget. Additionally, the bill lacks context or an explanation for why the repeal is necessary or beneficial, leaving its motivations open to question. There is also no clear identification of who might benefit from this repeal, which could lead to suspicions that the bill favors certain groups without a transparent justification.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the repeal of excise taxes on wagering could lead to mixed impacts. On one hand, individuals and businesses involved in wagering might experience financial relief, as they would no longer need to pay the excise tax. This could potentially lead to a boost in the wagering industry. On the other hand, the loss of tax revenue could result in a financial gap that might affect public services or require an increase in other taxes to balance the budget.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders like casinos, betting companies, and participants in other wagering activities, the repeal could offer a significant financial benefit by reducing their tax liabilities. This might encourage more investment in the industry and lead to economic growth within this sector. However, without further information about the bill's intent, there is a risk that it might disproportionately benefit larger corporations or industry insiders at the expense of broader public interest.
In conclusion, while the bill promises financial relief for the wagering community, it raises important questions about fiscal responsibility and equity. The absence of a detailed rationale and the unclear implications on the broader economy suggest that further deliberation and transparency are needed to evaluate the bill's full impact.
Issues
The repeal of excise taxes on wagering could lead to a loss of government revenue, which might need to be compensated for elsewhere. This is significant given its potential impact on the federal budget. (SEC. 2)
The bill does not provide context or reasons for the repeal, which could lead to questions about the motivation behind the decision and whether it is in the public interest. (SEC. 2)
There is no mention of potential beneficiaries of the repeal, which could raise concerns about whether this repeal is favoring certain groups or individuals who stand to benefit from reduced taxes on wagering. (SEC. 2)
The language regarding the effective date is straightforward, but the broader implications of the timing are not discussed. There may be a need for clarification on how this will impact future budgets and planned government spending. (SEC. 2)
The section is focused solely on the repeal and its effective date, without providing any analysis or projections about the socio-economic impact of such a repeal. This omission could affect policy evaluation and public scrutiny. (SEC. 2)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides the short title of the bill, stating that it may be called the “Discriminatory Gaming Tax Repeal Act of 2025.”
2. Repeal of excise taxes on wagering Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Chapter 35 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which imposes taxes on wagering, is being eliminated. This change will take effect for tax years starting after December 31, 2024.