Overview

Title

To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 1439 is a rule that says no one in the United States should be put in jail just because of their personal traits like what they look like or who they love, and it wants everyone to be treated fairly no matter what.

Summary AI

H. R. 1439 aims to protect individuals in the United States from being unlawfully detained based on certain personal characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability. It introduces amendments to Section 4001 of title 18 in the U.S. Code to establish that no one can be detained solely because of these characteristics. The bill also includes a provision for the Attorney General to identify additional protected characteristics but does not permit the removal of the existing ones. This bill underscores the importance of preserving civil liberties and due process for all individuals.

Published

2025-02-18
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-18
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1439ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
400
Pages:
3
Sentences:
18

Language

Nouns: 112
Verbs: 31
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 13
Entities: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.03
Average Sentence Length:
22.22
Token Entropy:
4.51
Readability (ARI):
11.43

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties Protection Act of 2025," designated as H.R. 1439, seeks to enhance due process protections for individuals in the United States by prohibiting the imprisonment or detention of individuals solely based on certain protected characteristics. These characteristics include race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability. The bill also allows the Attorney General to expand this list of protected characteristics if deemed necessary. The goal of the legislation is to prevent unlawful detentions that are predicated on discrimination against these identities.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues identified in the bill is the broad discretion given to the Attorney General to determine additional protected characteristics. The bill does not set clear criteria for how these additional characteristics should be identified, which could lead to inconsistency in how the law is applied. Moreover, the absence of a designated entity responsible for monitoring or enforcing compliance with this prohibition raises concerns about the efficacy and practical enforcement of the law.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to safeguard civil liberties, reinforcing the principle that individuals should not face detention simply due to their inherent or perceived identity traits. This could enhance trust in the legal system among marginalized communities who have historically been targeted based on these characteristics. By deterring unlawful detentions, the legislation seeks to ensure that all individuals are treated with fairness and equity in accordance with their rights under the Constitution.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Positive Impacts: - Marginalized Communities: This legislation could particularly benefit racial, ethnic, and other minority groups, who have often been disproportionately affected by discriminatory detention practices. - Civil Rights Organizations: These entities may find an additional legislative tool in advocating against discriminatory practices and could use this law as a basis for challenging unlawful detentions in court.

Negative Impacts: - Law Enforcement Agencies: Without a clear enforcement framework or monitoring agency, law enforcement may face challenges in implementing the requirements of this bill, leading to potential operational ambiguities. - The Judiciary: Courts might see an increase in litigation as individuals and groups test the boundaries and applications of these protections, particularly with respect to any additional characteristics designated by the Attorney General.

In conclusion, while the Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties Protection Act of 2025 presents a robust framework for defending individuals against discrimination-based detention, its implementation could face several practical challenges. These include the wide latitude granted to the Attorney General for defining protected characteristics and the lack of clear enforcement mechanisms, which might require further legislative or regulatory clarification to ensure consistent application and effectiveness.

Issues

  • The bill grants the Attorney General broad discretion to determine additional 'protected characteristics' without clearly defined criteria, which could lead to ambiguity or inconsistency in application. This is outlined in Section 2 of the bill.

  • There is no specified entity responsible for monitoring or enforcing compliance with the prohibition on unlawful detention based on protected characteristics, which could lead to enforcement issues. This is an issue identified in Section 2.

  • The section on the short title is minimal and provides insufficient context or content about the Act, making it difficult to assess for any specific financial implications or beneficiaries. This observation is made in Section 1.

  • The definition of 'protected characteristics' in Section 2 includes a wide range of identity markers, raising potential legal and ethical discussions about the breadth of its application and implications for due process.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies that the official name of the act is the "Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties Protection Act of 2025."

2. Prohibition against unlawful detention Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill amends U.S. law to prohibit imprisoning or detaining anyone solely based on their actual or perceived protected characteristics such as race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. Additionally, the Attorney General cannot remove these characteristics from protection but may add more to the list if deemed necessary.