Overview
Title
To prohibit the purchase or lease of agricultural land in the United States by persons associated with certain foreign governments, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill is like a rule that says people from certain countries, like China and Russia, aren't allowed to buy or rent farmland in the United States. It's meant to protect the land where food is grown, and the President has to make sure this rule is followed.
Summary AI
H.R. 1438 aims to prevent people linked to certain foreign governments, specifically Iran, North Korea, China, and Russia, from buying or leasing agricultural land in the United States. The bill requires the President to enforce these restrictions and bars these individuals from participating in specific Department of Agriculture programs. It amends existing laws to enhance reporting and transparency on foreign investments in U.S. agriculture and mandates various government reports to Congress on the issue of foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
H.R. 1438, titled the "Protecting America’s Agricultural Land from Foreign Harm Act of 2025," aims to restrict the purchase or lease of agricultural land in the United States by individuals associated with certain foreign governments, specifically targeting Iran, North Korea, China, and Russia. The bill seeks to prevent these "covered persons" from acquiring interests in U.S. farming land, and also bars their participation in Department of Agriculture programs, with certain exceptions. Additionally, it mandates regular reports to Congress on foreign ownership and influences regarding U.S. agricultural land, aiming to enhance transparency and security.
Significant Issues
Ambiguity in Definitions: The bill hinges on the term "covered persons," referencing individuals linked to specific foreign adversaries. However, the definition is tied to external regulations, which could change, leading to ambiguity. This could result in legal challenges or difficulties in determining who is actually prohibited from engaging in land purchase or lease transactions.
Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms: While the bill empowers the President to enforce these prohibitions, it lacks detailed monitoring or enforcement mechanisms. This might render the policy ineffective if not properly enforced or monitored.
Potential for Political Bias: The focus on specific countries in defining "foreign persons" may appear politically motivated. Without clear criteria for why these countries are singled out, this aspect of the bill could be perceived as biased.
Privacy and Data Concerns: The bill requires public access to detailed data about agricultural land ownership. However, it does not specify security measures to protect sensitive information, leading to privacy concerns.
Reporting and Coordination Challenges: Different government entities are tasked with providing similar reports on foreign ownership, which could lead to potential duplication of efforts and inconsistent data if not coordinated effectively.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill is designed to protect U.S. agricultural resources from foreign influence, theoretically preserving the nation’s food security and sovereignty. By restricting foreign ownership, the legislation aims to keep agricultural lands under domestic control, which could foster local agricultural interests and maintain national security.
However, restricted participation in agricultural programs might limit competitive opportunities and foreign investment benefits, potentially affecting innovation in agricultural practices. If not adequately enforced, the provisions might fail to prevent foreign influence, rendering the intended protections ineffective.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Farmers and Agricultural Businesses: U.S. farmers and agricultural businesses might benefit from reduced competition in land purchases, which could lead to more stable land prices. This could support domestic agricultural development. However, limiting foreign participation in agricultural programs may hinder partnerships or financial deals beneficial to some farmers looking for diverse collaboration or investment opportunities.
Foreign Investors: Foreign individuals and entities from the named countries will face new barriers in investing in U.S. agricultural land, limiting their international agricultural footprints. This could discourage capital investment in the U.S. agricultural sector from these regions.
Regulatory and Enforcement Agencies: The bill imposes additional reporting and analysis duties on various U.S. agencies. If not matched with resources or clear enforcement guidelines, these agencies might struggle to meet the requirements effectively, diminishing the bill’s intended oversight and enforcement benefits.
Overall, while the bill aims to protect crucial national interests, careful consideration of its implementation and potential repercussions is necessary to avoid unintended consequences or politicization.
Issues
The definition of 'covered persons' is ambiguously linked to foreign adversaries, potentially leading to legal challenges or confusion about who is prohibited from purchasing or leasing agricultural land (Section 2, Section 3).
The bill relies on external references for key definitions such as 'agricultural land' and 'covered person,' which can lead to ambiguities if those sources change (Section 2).
There are no detailed monitoring or enforcement mechanisms specified for the prohibition of land purchases or participation in agriculture programs, risking ineffective implementation (Section 3, Section 4).
The provision for penalties is linked to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act without detailed explanation, which can complicate understanding for those unfamiliar with it (Section 3).
There is ambiguity in terms like 'necessary actions' for the President, which could result in varying interpretations and inconsistent enforcement (Section 4).
The exceptions to participation in agricultural programs are not clearly defined, possibly leaving openings for exploitation (Section 4).
Reports required from different authorities can cause potential duplication of effort and inconsistency without clear coordination (Section 6).
The definition of 'foreign person' in reporting requirements could appear politically motivated and lacks criteria for inclusion, leading to perceived bias (Section 5, Section 6).
The bill lacks clear security measures for the public data sets, raising potential privacy concerns even though sensitive ownership data will be publicly available (Section 7).
The method for determining and updating the value of agricultural land is not specified, leading to possible inconsistencies and inaccuracies in data reporting (Section 5, Section 7).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it shall be known as the "Protecting America's Agricultural Land from Foreign Harm Act of 2025."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text defines key terms in the act: "agricultural land" is land used for farming, including ranching, following a specific law. A "covered person" is someone connected to certain foreign governments but does not include U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents. The "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of Agriculture, and the "United States" includes all states and territories.
3. Prohibition on purchase or lease of agricultural land in the United States by persons associated with certain foreign governments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits individuals connected to certain foreign governments from buying or leasing U.S. agricultural land, either publicly or privately owned. It gives the President authority to enforce this ban and outlines penalties for violations, while ensuring current owners who are covered by this law do not need to sell their land immediately.
4. Prohibition on participation in Department of Agriculture programs by persons associated with certain foreign governments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed section prohibits people associated with certain foreign governments from participating in Department of Agriculture programs if they own or lease agricultural land in the United States. However, exceptions are made for programs related to food safety, health and labor safety, or those managed by the Farm Service Agency.
5. Agricultural foreign investment disclosure Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978 to include security interests and leases in reporting requirements, adjusts civil penalties for violations and introduces liens on land, and mandates the publication of updated public data sets on foreign ownership of agricultural land. It also defines a "foreign person" to include entities from certain countries like China and Russia that trade equity securities on foreign exchanges.
7. Public data sets Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary is required to publish data sets on a specific internet database that include detailed information about agricultural land reports, such as purchase prices, updated land values, and details of foreign owners holding more than 1% interest. These data sets need to be updated within 30 days of receiving any new report.
6. Reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the Secretary of Agriculture, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Government Accountability Office to submit separate reports to Congress within one year of the bill's enactment and every two years after. These reports will address foreign ownership of agricultural land in the U.S., detailing associated risks, monitoring practices, the role of various government authorities, and potential foreign influences, along with staffing and enforcement recommendations.