Overview
Title
To expand the mission of the National Park Service to include active use of System units located in urban areas, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make city parks more fun by having more activities like sports and community events, but it doesn't say how to pay for these new things.
Summary AI
H. R. 1429 proposes to enhance the role of the National Park Service by promoting active use of park units located in urban areas. The bill, introduced by Ms. Norton and referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, aims to encourage recreational activities such as sports, community events, and use of pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly infrastructure in these urban parks. It includes amendments to Title 54 of the United States Code, defining "active use" and specifying what constitutes an "urban area."
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The “Activating National Parks in Cities Act” seeks to broaden the mission of the National Park Service by emphasizing the active use of parks located in urban settings. This bill proposes amendments to existing U.S. law to highlight the benefits of parks for enhancing quality of life in cities. By specifying uses such as playgrounds, sports facilities, and community events, it aims to transform how urban parks are utilized.
Summary of the Bill
This legislation targets the roles of National Parks in urban areas, emphasizing their potential to improve citizens' quality of life. It seeks to incorporate active and recreational uses into the National Park Service's mission, encouraging parks to become central hubs for community activities in cities. The bill includes definitions for “active use” and “urban area” to aid in implementation.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise when considering the execution of this bill:
Ambiguity of "Active Use": The term is broadly defined, which might lead to various interpretations, causing inconsistencies in implementation across different urban areas.
Funding Mechanisms: The bill lacks details on funding, which may hinder the successful application of its provisions. No budget allocations are specified, potentially limiting the extent of improvements that can be achieved.
Determination of "Urban Areas": The reliance on the Secretary of Commerce's designation of urban areas via the decennial census could become problematic if delays or changes occur in this process.
Prioritization of Resources: Focusing on activities like playgrounds and community events could spark debate over financial priorities, especially when essential services and other urban needs are weighed against recreational enhancements.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to positively impact city dwellers by advocating for spaces that support leisure, recreation, and community gatherings. By enhancing these spaces, urban residents might experience improved mental and physical health due to increased access to recreational activities and community events.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Urban Residents: This group could see a boost in their quality of life if the envisioned park improvements materialize, making urban areas more attractive places to live and work.
Local Governments and Park Agencies: These entities may face challenges balancing the bill's goals with existing budget constraints. Without explicit funding provisions in the legislation, they might struggle to allocate resources effectively.
Community Groups and Event Organizers: These stakeholders could benefit from increased opportunities to host and engage in community events, providing new experiences for residents and fostering a stronger sense of community.
Environmental and Preservation Groups: Some may express concerns about the potential impact on park conservation efforts if the active-use initiative prioritizes development and recreational features over maintaining natural spaces.
In summary, while the bill presents an ambitious plan to revitalize urban parks, its successful implementation hinges on addressing the highlighted issues, particularly in terms of funding and clarity of the “active use” concept. If these are resolved, the bill has the potential to transform urban parks into vibrant centers of community life.
Issues
The term 'active use' in Section 2 is broad and subjective, potentially leading to varied interpretations by different stakeholders. This lack of specificity could result in inconsistent implementation across urban areas.
Section 2 promotes the active use of System units in urban areas but does not specify any funding mechanisms or budget allocations. This omission could lead to significant implementation challenges, as additional financial or resource planning is essential for successful execution.
The definition of 'urban area' in Section 2 relies on the designation by the Secretary of Commerce in the most recent decennial census. This reliance could cause discrepancies or delays if there are changes or issues with how urban areas are determined or updated.
The focus on activities such as playgrounds and community events in Section 2 may lead to debates over prioritizing funds for these activities versus essential services in urban areas without clear guidelines. This could result in conflicts over resource allocation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be officially called the “Activating National Parks in Cities Act.”
2. Active use of System units in urban areas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends Title 54 of the United States Code to encourage the active use of System units in urban areas by highlighting uses that enhance quality of life, such as playgrounds and community events. It also defines "urban area" based on the latest census, as determined by the Secretary of Commerce.