Overview
Title
To require certain flags of the United States to be made in the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure that any American flags used by the government are completely made in the United States, which means all parts have to be from here too. It also asks for a report on how well the rules about making flags in the U.S. are followed.
Summary AI
H.R. 1421, known as the “Make American Flags in America Act of 2025,” stipulates that certain U.S. flags displayed on federal property or procured by federal agencies must be entirely manufactured in the United States. The bill outlines definitions for terms like "Federal agency" and "Federal property" and mandates compliance with international agreements. It allows a two-year span for the display requirement and a 90-day period for the procurement directive, post-enactment. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission is tasked with studying and reporting on enforcement of country-of-origin labeling for U.S. flags, including any violations and recommendations for improving enforcement and deterrence.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025" aims to ensure that certain United States flags are manufactured entirely within the country. This requirement applies specifically to flags displayed on federal property or purchased by federal agencies. The bill sets forth definitions and mandates compliance timelines. It also calls for a study on the enforcement of country-of-origin labeling for U.S. flags, with a report to be submitted to Congress.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several significant issues, particularly regarding its stringent requirements. The definition of a flag "Made in the United States" necessitates that 100% of the flag's materials and manufacturing be U.S.-based. This may lead to limited supplier options and increased costs for federal agencies. Moreover, the implementation timelines—90 days for procurement and 2 years for display—could lead to logistical challenges for agencies.
There is ambiguity in terms of how international agreements might influence these requirements, which could create legal uncertainties. Additionally, the bill does not address potential exceptions or provide guidance for scenarios where flags are urgently needed but compliant ones are unavailable, which might hinder federal operations.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could enhance national pride by ensuring that U.S. flags are made domestically, potentially supporting U.S. manufacturing jobs and boosting local economies. However, these benefits may come at a cost versus relying on potentially cheaper international suppliers, which could increase federal spending and, indirectly, taxpayer burden.
The requirement for flags to be entirely produced in the United States could also lead to supply chain challenges, potentially affecting federal operations if agencies face difficulties in obtaining compliant flags on time.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Federal Agencies: These agencies may face operational challenges due to stringent compliance requirements and potential increased procurement costs. The lack of guidance in specific scenarios could further complicate their logistical operations.
U.S. Manufacturers: Domestic manufacturers might benefit from increased demand for U.S.-made flags, potentially resulting in economic growth and job creation within this sector. However, they may also experience pressure to meet the strict requirements set forth by the bill.
Entities Subject to International Agreements: Ambiguities relating to international agreements pose potential legal challenges, which may need careful navigation and could affect the implementation of the bill.
Non-Federal Entities Using Federal Property: The definition of "Federal property" might create jurisdictional challenges if non-federal entities display flags on such properties and are subject to these regulations.
In summary, while the bill seeks to ensure national symbols like the U.S. flag are made domestically, its stringent requirements and potential ambiguities might pose challenges and increase costs for federal agencies, complicating its broader positive impact on U.S. manufacturing.
Issues
The definition of 'Made in the United States' being 100% manufactured within the United States (Section 2) is very stringent and could limit supplier options. This may lead to difficulties for Federal agencies in procuring flags, possibly resulting in increased costs and limited supply.
Potential logistical and financial challenges for Federal agencies to ensure flags are 100% made in the United States could lead to procurement delays and increased expenses (Section 2). There is a lack of specified management or funding for these increased costs.
The term 'international agreements' in Section 2(c) is ambiguous as it does not specify which agreements may influence the enforcement of the flag manufacturing requirement, potentially causing legal uncertainties in its application.
The applicability timeline in Section 2 for display and procurement requirements (2 years and 90 days, respectively) could be confusing or difficult to manage for Federal agencies, possibly leading to compliance issues.
The absence of exceptions for urgent procurement needs or guidance when compliant flags are not available in a timely manner (Section 11) could lead to operational challenges for Federal agencies needing flags quickly.
The requirement that all materials must be sourced 100 percent from within the United States (Section 11) could lead to significant compliance and verification challenges and might complicate sourcing processes for Federal agencies.
The definition of 'Federal property' includes properties leased or occupied by Federal agencies (Section 11), which could complicate situations where non-federal entities display flags on such properties, leading to potential jurisdictional dilemmas.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill assigns it the name "Make American Flags in America Act of 2025," which will be used as its official short title.
2. Requirement for certain flags of United States to be made in United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that flags of the United States, when displayed on federal property or purchased by federal agencies, must be made entirely in the United States. It establishes a timeline for compliance and clarifies that this requirement does not apply to private individuals or entities.
11. Display on Federal property; procurement by Federal agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it explains that federal agencies are only allowed to display or buy American flags on federal property if those flags are entirely made in the United States. It also defines key terms like what counts as a "Federal agency" and "Federal property" and makes sure to be consistent with international agreements.
3. Study on country-of-origin labeling for flags of the United States Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission to study how well the rules for labeling where U.S. flags are made are being enforced. Within a year, they must report their findings to Congress, including any recommendations to make these rules stronger and better at stopping rule-breaking.