Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to develop a strategy to increase membership in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill asks two important government people, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, to come up with a plan to get more countries to join a special group that helps share security and prosperity in the Middle East. They need to figure out what's good about the group and what might be stopping other countries from joining, and then tell Congress about it.
Summary AI
H.R. 1385, known as the "Strengthening Cooperation and Security in the Middle East Act," requires the Secretary of State, alongside the Secretary of Defense, to create a strategy to increase membership in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement (CSIPA). This involves submitting a report within 180 days that evaluates CSIPA's strategic benefits, including enhancing military readiness and regional stability in the Middle East, and identifies barriers to expanding its membership. Additionally, a strategy must be developed to encourage more countries to join CSIPA, with both the report and strategy presented to Congress in an unclassified format but potentially with a classified annex.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Strengthening Cooperation and Security in the Middle East Act," aims to enhance collaborative efforts by expanding the membership of the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement (CSIPA). Introduced to the House on February 14, 2025, the bill mandates the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to develop a strategic report focused on enlarging CSIPA's membership base. CSIPA, an agreement that seeks to bolster security and economic integration in the Middle East, is viewed as a critical framework for regional stability and cooperation. The legislation stipulates a timeline of 180 days for the submission of this report and the formation of a comprehensive strategy, with a subsequent briefing on implementation within 60 days thereafter.
Summary of Significant Issues
A primary concern with this bill is its lack of specific budgetary provisions or funding allocations, potentially leading to inefficient resource utilization as the strategy unfolds. The timelines proposed for developing the report and strategy may also be overly ambitious, risking rushed or incomplete outcomes given the international scope and stakeholder involvement required. Furthermore, broad and vague language, particularly concerning the terms "affirmative steps" and "expand cooperation in the fields of commerce, science, and technology," could result in ambiguity regarding the objectives and success metrics of the strategy. Additionally, while the bill calls for consultation with various stakeholders, it remains unclear how this process will be managed effectively, leading to possible inefficiencies or exclusions.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill could have a substantial impact on public perceptions of U.S. engagement in the Middle East. Should the bill lead to successful expansion and collaboration through CSIPA, citizens might observe positive developments in regional stability and security, potentially leading to enhanced economic opportunities and reduced threats from regional adversaries. However, the absence of specific budgetary details could foster skepticism among the public regarding financial oversight and accountability, especially if the strategy fails to achieve its goals.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For government entities like the Department of State and the Department of Defense, the bill poses a demand on resources and strategic alignment, as these departments will be central to initiating and executing the bill's mandates. This could result in increased workloads and the need for transparent interdepartmental coordination. Regional partners and allied nations could stand to benefit from a broadened CSIPA membership, potentially gaining access to enhanced security frameworks, economic ties, and diplomatic relationships with the U.S. However, inefficiencies in executing the strategy could lead to dissatisfaction or weakened trust among allies.
For non-governmental organizations and enterprises engaged in commerce, science, and technology in the region, the bill might offer new collaborative opportunities but could also pose challenges if the implementation process is fraught with ambiguity or lacks clear direction. Overall, while the bill aspires to strengthen regional alliances through CSIPA, it carries inherent challenges that may affect its efficacy and the satisfaction of its stakeholders.
Issues
The report and strategy mentioned in Section 2 lacks specific budgetary allocation or funding details, which raises concerns about potential wasteful spending or insufficient resources being allocated to effectively achieve its goals.
The timelines for strategy development and report submissions in Section 2 may be overly aggressive considering the complexity of international agreements and the need for coordination with multiple stakeholders, potentially resulting in rushed or incomplete analysis.
The language used in Section 2, specifically terms like 'affirmative steps' and 'expand cooperation in the fields of commerce, science, and technology', is broad and lacks specificity, which could lead to ambiguity in the goals and measures outlined in the strategy.
Section 2 does not specify criteria for identifying 'domestic and regional factors or barriers', which might lead to ambiguities and lack of focus in determining obstacles to CSIPA expansion.
The lack of clarity in how the consultation process with stakeholders, including other countries, will be conducted in Section 2 leaves room for potential inefficiencies or exclusion of necessary parties, potentially affecting the effectiveness of the strategy.
While the bill involves committees from both the House and Senate, as noted in Section 2, it omits consideration of state-level factors, which may affect regional implementation strategies.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill assigns it a short title, officially naming it the "Strengthening Cooperation and Security in the Middle East Act."
2. Report and strategy on increasing membership in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section mandates that the Secretary of State, with input from the Secretary of Defense, must create a report within 180 days outlining a strategy to expand membership in the Comprehensive Security Integration and Prosperity Agreement (CSIPA) by assessing its benefits and identifying barriers to expansion. Following the report, a strategy must be submitted to Congress on engaging additional countries to join CSIPA, with a subsequent implementation plan being briefed within 60 days.