Overview
Title
To amend the Animal Health Protection Act to provide compensation for poultry growers and layers in control areas, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1376 is a plan to give money to people who raise chickens when they can't work because of health rules. This money helps make sure they have what they need while their chickens are away.
Summary AI
H. R. 1376 aims to amend the Animal Health Protection Act to offer financial compensation to poultry growers and layers located in control areas, where raising poultry might be restricted due to health measures. The bill defines a "control area" and ensures compensation to facility owners based on their average income from previous poultry flocks, with specific conditions and exceptions. The compensation will not exceed the difference between the calculated amount and any other compensation received from states or other sources, with decisions not open to judicial review. Payments are required to be made within 60 days of a compensation request submission.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Healthy Poultry Assistance and Indemnification Act of 2025," aims to amend the Animal Health Protection Act. It seeks to provide financial compensation to poultry growers and layers whose operations are impacted because their facilities are located in designated control areas. These control areas are determined by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) in response to disease outbreaks or other regulatory reasons. The compensation is calculated based on the average income from the last five flocks and is adjusted by any other payments the owners might have received for similar reasons.
Summary of Significant Issues
One significant issue with the bill is the potential for subjective or arbitrary decision-making in defining what qualifies as a "control area." This definition is left up to the discretion of the Administrator of APHIS, which can lead to variability and lack of transparency. There is also an exclusion in the definition of poultry that does not cover certain birds like doves and pigeons, potentially disadvantaging certain livestock owners without clear reasoning.
Additionally, using the average income from the five most recent flocks as a baseline for compensation could benefit or disadvantage owners depending on current market trends and recent production levels. This method may not account for broader economic changes, potentially resulting in unfair compensation amounts. Notably, the decision by the Secretary on compensation is final, with no possibility for judicial review, which could limit recourse and accountability for affected poultry producers. Finally, the bill has exceptions related to compensation for destroyed animals, which may require further clarification to avoid confusion among stakeholders.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
Broadly, this bill intends to provide financial relief to poultry farmers affected by disease control measures, potentially stabilizing the poultry industry's economic aspect during crisis times. This could also have indirect positive effects on the food supply chain by ensuring that farmers are incentivized to comply with control measures without facing financial ruin.
For specific stakeholders, such as poultry growers and layers operating in these control areas, the bill could offer crucial financial support. However, the procedural aspects and limitations on judicial review might lead to concerns about the fairness and transparency of compensation decisions. Growers whose birds are excluded from the definition may feel unfairly treated, and those who have received partial compensation for destroyed animals might face dilemmas in navigating the stipulations for additional payments.
Overall, while the bill seems poised to support the poultry industry through difficult times, careful attention to its implementation details and potential revisions to address fairness and transparency concerns could enhance its effectiveness.
Issues
The provision in Section 2 that allows the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to determine the definition of a 'control area' could result in subjective or arbitrary decision-making without clear criteria or oversight, potentially leading to favoritism or inconsistency.
The exclusion of certain birds such as doves and pigeons from the definition of 'poultry' in Section 2 appears arbitrary and may disadvantage certain poultry growers without a clear rationale.
Section 2 states that the compensation calculation using the average income from the 5 most recent flocks could disproportionately benefit or disadvantage owners depending on fluctuations in the market or changes in production levels, without accounting for broader market trends.
The clause in Section 2 where the compensation amount determined by the Secretary is final and not subject to judicial review or other forms of oversight limits accountability and recourse for poultry growers, raising concerns about fairness and transparency.
The exception in Section 2 stating that no payment will be made to an owner who has received compensation for destroyed animals from subsection (d) may need clarification, particularly regarding timeframes and applicability to different facilities within the same control area.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section announces that the official name of the law is the “Healthy Poultry Assistance and Indemnification Act of 2025”.
2. Compensation for poultry growers and layers in control areas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill amends the Animal Health Protection Act to provide compensation to poultry farmers for flocks they are unable to raise because their facilities are located in designated control areas. The compensation amount is based on the average income from recent flocks, adjusted by any payments received from other sources, and must be requested and paid within a specific timeframe.