Overview
Title
To redesignate the third Monday in February as Presidents’ Day, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1371 wants to change the name of the holiday we know as "Washington's Birthday" in February to "Presidents' Day" so it matches how many people already think about it. It's like officially calling something by the name everyone already uses.
Summary AI
H. R. 1371 proposes to officially change the name of the federal holiday on the third Monday in February from "Washington's Birthday" to "Presidents’ Day." This bill, named the “Presidential Legacy Act,” would update references in existing laws and official documents to reflect this change. The purpose is to ensure all mentions of "Washington's Birthday" are replaced with "Presidents’ Day" for consistency in federal law and regulations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 1371, introduced in the 119th Congress, proposes a simple yet culturally significant change: renaming the federal holiday observed on the third Monday of February from "Washington’s Birthday" to "Presidents' Day." This change is encapsulated in what the bill terms the "Presidential Legacy Act." Its purpose is to alter how this holiday is officially recognized across federal documentation, rules, and legislation.
Significant Issues
While the bill’s intention seems straightforward, several issues arise from its implementation. Firstly, the bill does not conduct a cost analysis on the potential expenses required for updating federal documents and calendars to align with this name change. There is also no mention of the cultural or historical implications of renaming a holiday that has long celebrated the legacy of George Washington specifically.
Another significant issue is the use of the term "official paper" in the bill. This term is not clearly defined, potentially leading to confusion over which documents need to be updated. Furthermore, while the bill mandates changing existing documents, it does not specify whether future documents should automatically adopt the new name, which might cause inconsistency in future legal or official references.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the shift from "Washington's Birthday" to "Presidents' Day" may appear as a nominal change but holds substantial cultural weight. It acknowledges the collective contributions of all U.S. Presidents rather than focusing solely on the first. This might foster a broader recognition and respect for the roles all Presidents have played throughout American history. However, it could also dilute the specific commemoration of George Washington’s impact and legacy.
From an educational standpoint, teachers and educational content creators might need to adjust their material to accommodate this broader recognition of presidential legacies. Although these changes could be seamlessly integrated over time, they may initially require effort and adjustment.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For federal and state entities, this change could necessitate revisions in documentation, signage, and digital platforms to ensure consistency with the new terminology. This could incur costs and administrative effort, which the bill does not currently address.
Historians and cultural commentators may view the change with mixed feelings: some may celebrate the inclusivity of recognizing all Presidents, while others might see it as overshadowing George Washington's unique contribution and place in American history.
In conclusion, H.R. 1371, while seemingly a straightforward legislative change, carries with it underlying considerations in costs, cultural significance, and historical interpretation. Its impacts extend beyond simple nomenclature to influence teaching, commemoration practices, and the public’s historical understanding.
Issues
The bill does not address any implementation cost analysis for updating federal documentation and calendars reflecting the holiday change from Washington's Birthday to Presidents' Day, which could have financial implications. (Section 2)
There is no indication of impact analysis or consideration of the broader cultural or historical implications of renaming a federally recognized holiday, which could be significant in terms of public sentiment and historical context teaching. (Section 2)
The language 'any law, rule, regulation, or other official paper in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act' in Section 3 might cause confusion if there are documents not accounted for or if the date is misunderstood, potentially leading to inconsistencies.
There could be potential confusion or misinterpretation regarding the scope of 'official paper,' as it is not clearly defined what documents are covered under this term in the context of the Act, which could lead to legal ambiguities. (Section 3)
There is no clear specification on whether future documents should also adhere to this change, potentially leading to inconsistencies in terminology in future legal or official documents. (Section 3)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the legislation is the “Presidential Legacy Act.”
2. Redesignate the third Monday in February as Presidents’ Day Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changing the name of the holiday on the third Monday in February from "Washington’s Birthday" to "Presidents’ Day" in the United States Code.
3. Term Washington’s Birthday replaced Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section proposes to change all official references from "Washington’s Birthday" to "Presidents’ Day" in laws, rules, and regulations, except where specified otherwise. It specifically updates Title 4 of the United States Code and the Federal Contested Election Act to reflect this change.