Overview
Title
To transfer unobligated funds from the United States Agency for International Development to the Disaster Relief Fund.
ELI5 AI
The USA FIRST Act wants to move leftover money from a group that helps other countries to a special fund for emergencies and disasters in the United States. This is to make sure there's enough money to help people when bad things happen like storms or earthquakes.
Summary AI
H. R. 1370 proposes transferring any remaining unused funds from the United States Agency for International Development to the Disaster Relief Fund. This transfer is intended to support the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act for major disasters. The bill is known as the “Unobligated Spending Adjustment to Focus Investment on Relief and Support for Taxpayers Act” or the “USA FIRST Act.”
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
House Resolution 1370, introduced in the 119th Congress, aims to reallocate unobligated funds from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to the Disaster Relief Fund. The bill, titled the "Unobligated Spending Adjustment to Focus Investment on Relief and Support for Taxpayers Act" or the "USA FIRST Act," seeks to bolster the Disaster Relief Fund, which operates under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. The intention is to utilize these funds for managing and responding to major disasters declared under this legislation.
Significant Issues
A major issue raised by this bill is the potential impact on USAID projects. By diverting funds that were originally allocated for international development, there could be disruptions to ongoing projects and commitments. This reallocation might undermine efforts in global development, potentially affecting international relations and cooperation.
Additionally, the bill lacks clarity on the mechanism for determining the amount of unobligated funds that will be transferred. There are no detailed procedural guidelines or accountability measures included, which could lead to potential inefficiencies and lack of transparency in the transfer process. This ambiguity extends to how funds becoming unobligated after the enactment of the Act should be handled, leaving room for confusion and potential administrative challenges.
Implications for the Public
For the general public, this bill represents a strategic shift in allocating federal funds, focusing more on domestic disaster relief rather than international development. This reallocation could benefit communities affected by significant natural disasters by increasing available resources for relief and recovery efforts. However, it may raise concerns about the United States’ role in international aid and the potential long-term effects on global development projects.
Impact on Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
- Domestic Disaster Relief Agencies: By increasing the funds available, the bill could enhance the capacity of disaster relief agencies to respond to emergencies more effectively.
- Taxpayers: From a fiscal perspective, reallocating existing funds instead of increasing taxes or creating new budgetary allocations could be seen as a financially responsible move.
Negative Impacts:
- USAID and International Development Stakeholders: The reduction in funding might adversely affect initiatives aimed at health, education, and infrastructure development in other countries, potentially hindering progress and collaboration.
- International Partners and Recipients: Countries and organizations relying on USAID's support may experience delays or cancellations in project funding, affecting local development and international relations.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to prioritize domestic disaster relief efforts, it brings significant implications for international development and raises questions about the strategic direction of U.S. funds. The lack of detailed mechanisms for fund transfer and management could challenge effective implementation and transparency, warranting further examination and clarification.
Issues
The transfer of unobligated funds from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to the Disaster Relief Fund might significantly affect ongoing projects or commitments under USAID, potentially undermining international development efforts. This concern is outlined in Section 2.
The bill does not provide a clear process for determining, verifying, or transferring the amount of unobligated funds, which could lead to ambiguity and inefficiency in the fund transfer process. This issue is associated with Section 2.
There is a lack of clear guidelines on how funds that become unobligated after the enactment of the Act should be handled, potentially causing confusion or inefficiency. This omission is related to Section 2.
Section 2 fails to detail the specific processes and accountability mechanisms for transferring and using funds within the Disaster Relief Fund, raising concerns about transparency and tracking of these funds once transferred.
Section 1, titled 'Short title,' does not address any substantive issues related to funding or implementation, which may make it difficult to audit for potential misuses or ambiguities in legislative intent.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be called the "Unobligated Spending Adjustment to Focus Investment on Relief and Support for Taxpayers Act" or the "USA FIRST Act".
2. Transfer of unobligated funds to the disaster relief fund Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any leftover funds that were originally allocated to the United States Agency for International Development will be moved to the Disaster Relief Fund. These funds will be used for dealing with major disasters as outlined in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.