Overview

Title

An Act To provide for Department of Energy and National Science Foundation research and development coordination, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act is a plan for two important groups, the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation, to work together to study and make cool new technology like supercomputers and machines. They want to share ideas with schools and labs to help teach science and keep everything safe and fair.

Summary AI

H.R. 1350, known as the “DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act,” mandates collaboration between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) on research and development. The bill requires these agencies to create a partnership through a memorandum of understanding that encourages joint activities using a competitive and merit-based process. Research focus areas include quantum computing, energy sciences, and advanced manufacturing, with a strong emphasis on collaboration among federal agencies, national labs, and educational institutions. Additionally, the bill emphasizes supporting STEM education and professional development while ensuring research security aligns with federal standards.

Published

2025-03-24
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2025-03-24
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1350eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,104
Pages:
8
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 386
Verbs: 64
Adjectives: 68
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 43
Entities: 73

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.91
Average Sentence Length:
64.94
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
37.62

AnalysisAI

This proposed legislation, titled "DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act," seeks to promote collaboration between the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) in research and development activities. The primary purpose of the bill is to ensure that these two governmental entities work together to advance scientific and technological goals that align with their shared missions and priorities. This involves establishing formal agreements to facilitate this collaboration and encouraging participation from a variety of organizations.

General Summary of the Bill

At its core, this bill mandates the Secretary of Energy and the Director of the National Science Foundation to collaborate on research and development projects. These projects span a range of focus areas from quantum information sciences to advanced manufacturing technologies and STEM education enhancement. The bill also requires the establishment of a memorandum of understanding or other interagency agreements to manage this collaboration. Furthermore, the legislation emphasizes the importance of competitive, merit-based selection processes for research projects and collaborative efforts.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill, while promoting fruitful collaboration, raises some significant concerns. One major issue is the lack of specificity regarding budgetary allocations for these collaborative research activities. This absence could potentially lead to unchecked spending. Another concern is the vague language surrounding the roles and responsibilities of the DOE Secretary and NSF Director, which might create challenges in accountability. Additionally, the bill uses the term "appropriate entities" without a clear definition, opening the door for potential misuse or exclusion. The process for proposals and stakeholder engagement is not explicitly defined, which could create barriers to participation. Moreover, although the bill mentions research security compliance, it does not lay out specific measures or standards, which could lead to inconsistencies in application.

Impact on the Public

The general public could see both benefits and drawbacks from this legislation. On the positive side, improved coordination between the DOE and NSF could lead to significant advancements in technology and science, potentially leading to innovations that benefit society, such as new energy sources or advanced computing technologies. There could also be educational opportunities that might improve the skills of the workforce.

However, without clear budgetary guidelines, there is a risk of inefficient use of taxpayer dollars. Moreover, if the selection process for collaboration is not transparent, it could lead to a lack of trust in government processes. This could particularly be the case if favoritism is perceived in how collaborative partners are chosen.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For entities like educational institutions, federal agencies, and nonprofit organizations, the bill could provide substantial opportunities for joint ventures and access to greater resources and technology. Successful collaboration could enhance research capabilities and educational programs. However, these potential stakeholders might face challenges if they do not have clarity on how to engage in the process or if there are perceived biases in partner selection.

Overall, while the intent of the "DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act" is beneficial in fostering innovation through collaboration, significant details about operational and fiscal management need clarification to ensure the bill achieves its objectives efficiently and equitably.

Issues

  • The section on research and development coordination (Sec. 2) does not provide specific budgetary limits or allocations for the activities, potentially leading to unchecked or wasteful spending. This financial issue is significant as it may have implications for taxpayers and overall government spending efficiency.

  • The criteria for selecting collaborative partners and projects in Sec. 2(b) are not clearly defined, which might result in favoritism or bias. This ethical concern is important because it affects fairness and accountability in government-funded projects.

  • The vague language used to define the roles of the Secretary of Energy and the Director of the National Science Foundation in Sec. 2(a) may lead to ambiguity in responsibility and accountability. This legal issue is significant as it could impact effective governance and oversight.

  • The term 'appropriate entities' in Sec. 2(b) is used without precise definition, which could lead to misinterpretation and misuse. This might allow for exclusion or inclusion of certain organizations based on arbitrary criteria, posing an ethical concern.

  • The process for stakeholders to engage or submit proposals, as mentioned in the memorandum of understanding or interagency agreement in Sec. 2(b), is not clarified. This creates potential barriers to participation, raising an ethical concern related to transparency and equal opportunity.

  • The section lacks clear guidelines on how 'research infrastructure' will be supported or prioritized in Sec. 2(c)(3), which may result in unequal distribution of resources. This financial issue affects how effectively resources are allocated, impacting the success of various projects.

  • The report requirement in Sec. 2(e) does not specify the consequences or actions required if goals are not met, which could weaken oversight and accountability. This legal concern is important as it pertains to government accountability in achieving set objectives.

  • The mention of research security compliance in Sec. 2(f) lacks specific measures or standards, risking inconsistencies in how security practices are applied across different projects. This legal and ethical issue affects national security and the integrity of research data.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section provides the official short title for the Act, which is the “DOE and NSF Interagency Research Act”.

2. Department of Energy and National Science Foundation research and development coordination Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Energy and the Director of the National Science Foundation are required to work together on research and development projects that align with their missions, using agreements that ensure fair competition and collaboration among various organizations. They can explore different scientific areas, support infrastructure, and provide educational opportunities, and must report back on their progress, ensuring that their activities follow research security guidelines.