Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to develop long-distance bike trails on Federal land.
ELI5 AI
Imagine that the people in charge of big parks in the United States want to make new long bike paths where people can ride for a long time, at least 80 miles. This plan includes listening to what people think and making sure the paths don’t interfere with other things happening in the parks.
Summary AI
H.R. 1319 proposes that the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture work together to develop long-distance bike trails on federal lands in the United States. The bill requires the identification of at least 10 existing trails and 10 potential areas for new trails, ensuring these routes are at least 80 miles long and use natural surfaces as much as possible. It mandates the creation of a public comment process for trail development, promotes the use of signage and informational materials, and emphasizes avoiding conflicts with other land uses. The bill also calls for a report to be published two years after enactment, summarizing the identified trails and public feedback.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Biking on Long-Distance Trails Act," aims to enhance recreational opportunities by establishing long-distance biking trails on federal lands. The bill mandates joint efforts by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to identify and develop these trails. Specifically, it requires the identification of at least ten existing trails and ten potential areas for new trails that are no less than 80 miles long. The bill emphasizes using natural surface trails where feasible and aims for geographical fairness in trail distribution. Additionally, it calls for a public consultation process to gather input on trail development plans.
Significant Issues
One of the major issues relates to the bill's specification that long-distance bike trails must be at least 80 miles long. This criterion might unintentionally exclude shorter yet significant trails that could be viable for fostering local recreational and tourism activities.
The bill sets a tight deadline—18 months—for identifying existing and potential trails. This timeframe could impose challenges in thoroughly evaluating and planning trails across extensive federal lands, which might require considerable logistical coordination and resource allocation.
Additionally, the requirement for a public comment process while ensuring geographical equity in trail identification can add layers of complexity. It might delay the implementation of trail projects, hindering stakeholders who anticipate swift action.
Furthermore, the bill's provision to avoid conflicts with other land uses and comply with existing land management plans could restrain available areas for development. This adds planning complexity since the trails must be harmonized with current land uses and regulatory requirements.
Impact on the Public
Overall, if implemented as planned, the bill is expected to foster increased outdoor recreation opportunities, potentially boosting health and wellness among the public through cycling. These trails may also enhance tourism in regions featuring these new trails, contributing to local economies.
The provision requiring trails to be geographically equitable suggests efforts to ensure that various communities benefit from these developments, potentially increasing access to recreational infrastructure across different regions.
Impact on Stakeholders
Various stakeholders may experience diverse impacts. Outdoor enthusiasts, particularly cyclists, stand to gain from expanded biking opportunities presented by these trails. Local businesses and tourism industries might see increased patronage from visiting cyclists.
However, stakeholders vested in existing land uses, such as hiking, horseback riding, or conservation efforts, may express concerns about changes in land use dynamics. The bill’s emphasis on conflict avoidance should address these concerns but may also limit trail development in certain areas, potentially frustrating stakeholders eager for new biking options.
Federal agencies tasked with implementing this legislation may face resource and planning complexities due to the bill's deadlines and process requirements. Collaboration between various land management entities would be crucial to balance the diverse interests involved effectively.
Issues
The definition in Section 2 of 'long-distance bike trail' includes criteria that may exclude potential trails less than 80 miles long, which could limit opportunities for shorter, yet still significant, bike trails.
Section 3(a) mandates the identification of at least 10 long-distance bike trails within 18 months, which may be a challenging timeline for adequately assessing and planning these trails on Federal land.
The provision in Section 3, requiring public comment and consideration of geographically equitable trail projects, might delay the identification and development of trails, potentially impacting stakeholders who are eager for quick implementation.
Section 3(e) requires avoiding conflicts with other uses and complying with existing land use plans, which might limit the available areas for trail development and increase complexity in planning the trails.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act names it the "Biking on Long-Distance Trails Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several terms are defined. "Federal recreational lands" refers to a specific legal definition involving lands and waters managed under certain federal laws. "Long-distance bike trail" describes a bike route that is at least 80 miles long and mostly uses natural surface trails. It also outlines the roles of the "Secretaries," meaning the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, who are responsible for managing these lands.
3. Long-distance bike trails on Federal recreational lands Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section directs the Secretaries to identify at least 10 existing long-distance bike trails and 10 potential areas for new trails on federal recreational lands within 18 months. It sets out guidelines for soliciting public input, addressing trail conflicts with other land uses, and publishing supportive materials, like maps, in a balanced geographical manner.