Overview

Title

To prohibit the flying, draping, or other display of any flag other than the flag of the United States at public buildings, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 1313 is a rule that says only the American flag can be shown on important government buildings, but there are special times when other flags, like military flags or flags of visiting leaders, are allowed too.

Summary AI

H. R. 1313, known as the "One Flag for All Act," seeks to restrict the display of any flag other than the United States flag at public buildings. This includes both the exterior of these buildings and areas accessible to the public like hallways. There are exceptions, allowing certain flags such as the POW/MIA flag, flags of visiting foreign diplomats, state flags outside a Congress member's office, military flags, and those with historical significance to the United States. The Act defines public buildings to include structures under the jurisdiction of entities like the Senate, House of Representatives, military installations, and U.S. embassies.

Published

2025-02-13
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-13
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1313ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
897
Pages:
4
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 299
Verbs: 48
Adjectives: 36
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 34
Entities: 93

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.84
Average Sentence Length:
89.70
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
44.83

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "One Flag for All Act," seeks to establish a uniform approach to flag displays at public buildings in the United States. The bill, introduced in the 119th Congress, 1st Session, prohibits the display of any flag other than the U.S. flag on or in public buildings accessible to the public. However, it outlines several exceptions where other flags can be displayed, such as flags with historical significance, flags representing Indian Tribes, or those associated with specific national observances.

Summary of Significant Issues

A notable issue is the reliance on external legal statutes to define key terms, such as "covered public building." This could obscure the bill's applicability to those without legal expertise, as it requires consulting additional legal texts to fully understand which buildings are impacted. Furthermore, the bill does not specify any enforcement mechanism or penalties for non-compliance, leading to potential ambiguity in its application.

Another critical concern is the extensive list of exceptions that may significantly weaken the primary prohibition. This may lead to inconsistent application across different jurisdictions, ultimately undermining the purpose of the bill. Additionally, there are ambiguities regarding flag display provisions for Members of Congress representing multiple jurisdictions and situations involving multiple local jurisdictions at a single location.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, the bill aims to promote uniformity and national unity through the exclusive display of the U.S. flag at public buildings. However, the multitude of exceptions might mean the practical effect of the legislation could be less significant than intended. With no clear penalties outlined for violation, the enforcement of these rules could vary considerably, leading to inconsistent flag display practices across the nation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The bill could positively reinforce national symbols and feelings of unity among citizens by mandating the predominance of the U.S. flag. However, stakeholders such as public building administrators may face challenges in interpreting and implementing the legislation due to its complexity and the range of exceptions allowed.

Members of Congress might experience logistical or interpretative difficulties in deciding which flags can be legitimately displayed, especially in constituencies with multiple jurisdictions. Moreover, communities or groups that value the representation of flags other than the national flag, such as those with significant cultural connections to other nations or symbols, may view this bill as limiting their ability to express their identity publicly.

Overall, while the bill's intention to standardize flag displays may be well-meaning, several significant issues could impede its effective implementation and consistent application, potentially affecting various stakeholders in different ways.

Issues

  • The meaning of 'covered public building' (Section 2(a)) is not directly explained in the bill but relies on another statute (section 3301(a) of title 40, United States Code). This reliance on external legal references may make it challenging for readers without legal expertise to fully understand which buildings are impacted by this legislation, potentially leading to confusion about the bill's applicability.

  • The bill does not specify an enforcement mechanism or penalty for those who violate the prohibition on displaying non-U.S. flags (Section 2(a)). This lack of clarity may lead to ambiguity regarding consequences for non-compliance and could result in inconsistent application across different jurisdictions.

  • The numerous exceptions listed under Section 2(b) appear to significantly dilute the prohibitions outlined in Section 2(a). These exceptions, which allow for the display of various other flags under specific circumstances, could limit the practical effect of the primary prohibition, potentially rendering it ineffective or leading to inconsistent application.

  • Subsection 2(b)(4) mentions that a Member of Congress can display their State flag but does not address situations where a Member represents a district that includes multiple jurisdictions. This omission may cause confusion regarding which flags can be displayed and under what circumstances, raising potential issues of inconsistency.

  • Subsection 2(b)(12) allows for the display of flags representing local jurisdictions, but does not clarify what happens when there are multiple jurisdictions at a single location. This lack of guidance may lead to inconsistency in flag display practices across different public buildings.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section titled "Short title" states that this Act can be referred to as the “One Flag for All Act.”

2. Prohibition on flags other than the flag of the United States Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits displaying any flag other than the United States flag on or in public buildings accessible to the public, but it allows exceptions for certain flags, such as those representing POW/MIA, military or historical significance, foreign diplomats, religious ceremonies, federal agencies, Indian Tribes, and state or local jurisdictions.