Overview

Title

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the mileage rate offered by the Department of Veterans Affairs through their Beneficiary Travel program for health related travel, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to help veterans by giving them more money when they travel to get medical help. It says that the money for each mile they travel should be the same as the amount government workers get when they go on trips for work.

Summary AI

H.R. 1288 aims to improve the mileage reimbursement rate for veterans who use the Department of Veterans Affairs' Beneficiary Travel program for health-related travel. The bill mandates that this mileage rate should at least match the rate provided to government employees for official travel. Additionally, the bill requires that travel reimbursements be processed and paid within 90 days of a properly submitted request. The existing rate of 41.5 cents per mile would be updated in line with these changes, ensuring fair compensation for veterans' travel expenses.

Published

2025-02-13
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-13
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1288ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
541
Pages:
3
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 173
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 17
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 16
Entities: 50

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.03
Average Sentence Length:
67.62
Token Entropy:
4.79
Readability (ARI):
34.70

AnalysisAI

General Summary

H.R. 1288, dubbed the "Driver Reimbursement Increase for Veteran Equity Act of 2025" or the "DRIVE Act of 2025," aims to amend the existing laws governing the reimbursement mileage rate given to veterans. Specifically, it seeks to increase the mileage rate offered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for veterans traveling for health-related services. This bill proposes that the mileage rate be no less than what government employees receive when using their vehicles for official business. Additionally, the bill introduces a requirement for the VA to process and pay these travel allowances within 90 days from the time a request is properly submitted. Various technical amendments are also included to clarify and update the language regarding this reimbursement process.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several significant issues arise from the proposed amendments within the bill:

  1. Frequency of Rate Adjustments: The bill stipulates that the mileage rate should match or exceed that of government employees, but it lacks clear guidelines on how frequently this rate should be reviewed and adjusted. Without this specification, there could be delays in keeping the rates aligned with actual travel costs.

  2. Clarity on Submission Requirements: The provision that a request for mileage reimbursement be "properly submitted" is mentioned, yet it does not define what this entails. Ambiguity around these requirements might lead to delays or denials based on technicalities, affecting veterans' ability to access their benefits.

  3. Accountability and Repercussions: There are no outlined consequences if the VA fails to meet the 90-day deadline for processing reimbursements. This omission could result in a lack of accountability and potential delays in reimbursements for veterans who rely on these payments.

  4. Lack of Contextual Clarity: The bill makes amendments by referencing other sections without discussing their current content, which may lead to confusion or misunderstanding of the full scope and implications among stakeholders and lawmakers.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill's intention to increase mileage reimbursement aligns with ensuring veterans are adequately supported in accessing healthcare, potentially leading to better health outcomes. Additionally, setting a reimbursement rate at a more competitive level could reduce the financial burden on veterans required to travel for medical appointments.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Veterans: Positively, veterans could see improved financial support when seeking necessary medical care, which is particularly beneficial for those residing in rural areas where travel distances are longer. However, without clear guidelines on processing times and submission requirements, veterans might still face challenges in accessing timely reimbursements.

  • Department of Veterans Affairs: The VA might face increased administrative pressure to meet processing deadlines and ensure alignment with the government mileage rate. The lack of specified repercussions for failing deadlines may lead to organizational difficulties in enforcing these changes effectively.

  • Policymakers: Lawmakers need to carefully consider the ambiguities and potential gaps identified in the bill. Enhancing clarity around rate adjustments, submission criteria, and consequences for missed deadlines could strengthen the effectiveness and fairness of the proposed changes.

Ultimately, while the DRIVE Act of 2025 aims to enhance support for veterans, careful consideration of these highlighted issues is needed to ensure its successful implementation and delivery of intended benefits.

Issues

  • The amendment of subsection (g) in Section 2 does not specify how often the mileage rate is to be reviewed or adjusted to ensure it remains equal to or greater than the rate for government employees, potentially allowing for delays in alignment with actual costs, which could financially impact veterans relying on timely reimbursements.

  • Section 2, subsection (b)(5) includes language about timely processing of allowances, but lacks a clear definition of a 'properly submitted' request, which may create ambiguity and lead to processing delays or denials based on technicalities, impacting veterans' access to their entitled benefits.

  • Subsection (b)(5) of Section 2 does not specify any repercussions or corrective actions if the 90-day processing timeline for payments is not met, creating potential accountability issues for the Department of Veterans Affairs and leaving veterans without recourse in case of delays.

  • The amendments in Section 2 make references to other sections without providing their current content or context, which makes it difficult for lawmakers, veterans, and the public to fully understand the impact and implications of the proposed changes, leading to potential legal or interpretative challenges.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill gives it a short title, stating that it can be officially called the "Driver Reimbursement Increase for Veteran Equity Act of 2025" or simply the "DRIVE Act of 2025".

2. Payments or allowances by Department of Veterans Affairs for beneficiary travel Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The proposed amendments ensure that the mileage rate for Department of Veterans Affairs beneficiary travel is at least as much as the rate for government employees using their own vehicles for official business. Additionally, they require that mileage allowances be paid within 90 days of a properly submitted request and make technical changes to previous wording.