Overview
Title
To direct the Surgeon General to conduct a study regarding the use of mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools, and to establish a pilot program of awarding grants to enable certain schools to create a school environment free of mobile devices.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1275, called the "Focus on Learning Act," wants to study how phones and tablets affect kids at school and give some schools money to try keeping them in lockers, with some exceptions for important needs.
Summary AI
H. R. 1275, titled the “Focus on Learning Act,” aims to reduce the use of mobile devices in schools. It directs the Surgeon General to study how mobile devices affect students' education and behavior. The bill also proposes a pilot program where schools can receive grants to create mobile device-free environments by using secure lockers. Exceptions are made for health, disability, and language translation needs, and the bill requires schools to communicate with parents about these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Focus on Learning Act," mandates that the Surgeon General initiate a nationwide study on the use of mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools. This study is to explore the various impacts of mobile device usage, including on student learning, mental health, and classroom environments. Furthermore, the bill calls for a pilot program that provides grants to schools, enabling them to create environments free of personal mobile devices by securing student phones during school hours.
Significant Issues
Several potential issues have been identified within the bill. One major concern is the broad definition of "mobile device" in the bill, which could lead to confusion about which devices are included. This is crucial for implementing clear and enforceable policies in schools.
The bill also lacks detailed planning for the proposed study. Notably, it does not include a budget or cost estimate, which raises concerns about financial accountability. Furthermore, the two-year timeline for conducting the study could be considered too lengthy, especially given the rapid changes in technology and its educational impacts.
Another significant issue is the vagueness regarding the pilot program. The bill does not define what constitutes a "secure container" for mobile devices, leading to potential inconsistencies in implementation. Additionally, there are no established criteria to evaluate the success of the pilot program, which could result in inconclusive outcomes and lack of accountability.
Privacy concerns are also notable, as the bill does not address how student data will be protected during the study. Additionally, the process for collecting and considering parental feedback in the pilot program is not specified, which could impact the transparency of the initiative.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
The legislation could significantly influence students, educators, and the education system as a whole. By restricting mobile device usage, the bill aims to enhance learning environments and potentially improve student focus and behavioral outcomes. For students, this might mean fewer distractions during school hours, which could lead to better academic performance. However, it could also raise equity issues, as not all students have equal access to alternative resources or communication tools.
For educators and school administrators, the bill presents the challenge of implementing and enforcing new policies related to mobile device management. This could require additional resources, training, and possibly infrastructure upgrades to securely store student devices.
Parents are another key stakeholder group, as they might have concerns about the ability to communicate with their children during school hours. The bill provides some exceptions for emergency and necessary uses, but the lack of clarity around these exceptions could lead to apprehension among parents.
Overall, while the bill aims to improve educational outcomes, the lack of clarity in its provisions could lead to implementation challenges and unintended consequences. It remains crucial for legislative officials to address these concerns to ensure the bill effectively meets its intended goals without disproportionately affecting certain student groups or compromising privacy standards.
Financial Assessment
In examining the financial aspects of H. R. 1275, titled the "Focus on Learning Act," there are specific points related to spending and financial allocations that are worth discussing.
Financial Allocations and Appropriations
The bill authorizes $5,000,000 to be appropriated for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2029 to support the pilot program aimed at creating mobile device-free schools (Section 4, Clause g). This funding is intended to enable local educational agencies to purchase secure containers and install lockers to enforce mobile device-free environments in participating schools.
Additionally, the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Health and Human Services are permitted to use not more than 2 percent of this allocation for administrative expenses, data collection, and conducting the study required by the bill (Section 4, Clause f). This stipulation is critical for ensuring that the operational and evaluative components of the bill are properly funded.
Relation to Identified Issues
Lack of a Detailed Budget for the Study: One issue identified in the bill (as noted in the Issues section) is the absence of a specified budget or cost estimate for conducting the study required by Section 3. Without a detailed budget, there is potential for excessive or undefined spending, which raises concerns about fiscal accountability. While the appropriations for the pilot program are clear, the financial aspects of the study itself are less defined, leading to a potential gap in fiscal planning.
Lack of Specificity in Fund Distribution: Another concern relates to the lack of specificity in how the $5,000,000 in funding will be distributed over the years 2025 to 2029. Without clear guidelines, there is a risk of mismanagement or imbalance in funding allocation. This includes the potential for unequal distribution among participating schools, which could undermine the pilot program's effectiveness and fairness.
Ambiguity Around "Secure Containers": The bill earmarks funds for purchasing secure containers to store mobile devices. However, there is a lack of clear definitions and criteria for what constitutes a "secure container," which may lead to varied and potentially ineffective solutions. This ambiguity could result in inefficient use of funds if investments in infrastructure do not meet the intended security standards.
Overall, while the bill allocates a substantial amount of money toward creating mobile device-free environments, there are notable gaps and ambiguities in financial planning and execution. These issues could potentially affect the effectiveness and accountability of the bill's initiatives if not addressed.
Issues
The study timeline of 2 years might be too long and could delay addressing identified issues with mobile device use in schools, as mentioned in Section 3. This could be significant considering the fast-paced changes in technology and its impact on education.
The definition of 'mobile device' in Section 2 is broad and open to interpretation, potentially leading to confusion and enforcement challenges in schools, which is crucial for operational clarity.
The bill in Section 3 lacks a specified budget or cost estimate for conducting the study, raising concerns of potentially excessive or undefined spending, which is important from a fiscal accountability perspective.
Section 4 lacks clear definitions and criteria, particularly the term 'secure containers', which leads to ambiguity in implementation and could result in varied and potentially ineffective solutions.
The pilot program, as described in Section 4, does not specify evaluation metrics or outcomes for measuring success or failure, leading to potential inconclusive results and lack of accountability.
Privacy and confidentiality of student data are not addressed in Section 3 during the study, posing an ethical concern regarding student rights and data protection.
In Section 4, the lack of specific criteria for selecting participating schools in the pilot program might lead to biased or potentially inequitable selection processes, affecting the data collection's credibility.
The language in Section 4 does not specify how parental feedback will be collected or considered, which may affect the transparency and accountability of the feedback process, highlighting a need for a structured approach.
There is no mandate in Section 4 for how the $5,000,000 funding will be distributed over the fiscal years, raising concerns of potential mismanagement or imbalance in funding allocation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Focus on Learning Act."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines several key terms: "ESEA terms" refers to definitions found in a specific education act, "mobile device" includes personal phones and electronic gadgets but not school-issued devices, "school environment free of mobile devices" describes a school setting where student devices are stored securely, and "school hours" covers regular school instructional periods and breaks.
3. Study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that within two years, the Surgeon General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services will conduct a study on how mobile devices are used in U.S. elementary and secondary schools, focusing on their effects on learning, mental health, and behavior. They will also analyze data from a related pilot program and report the findings to Congress and the public.
4. Pilot program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a pilot program established by the Secretary of Education, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to fund local schools so they can create a mobile device-free environment by installing secure containers and lockers. Schools interested in participating must submit a detailed application, and exemptions for mobile device use are allowed for health monitoring, students with disabilities, and translation for English learners; additionally, schools must inform and seek feedback from parents, and the program is funded with $5 million from 2025 to 2029.
Money References
- (f) Administrative expenses.—The Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Health and Human Services may use not more than 2 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for administrative expenses, data collection, and carrying out the study required under section 3. (g) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, $5,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2025 through 2029.