Overview
Title
To suspend the production of the penny and nickel, to require the Comptroller General of the United States to carry out a study on pennies and nickels, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill suggests taking a break from making pennies and nickels for 10 years and wants experts to study what happens when they stop. They're checking if this saves money and how it changes buying things.
Summary AI
H.R. 1270 proposes to stop making pennies and nickels for 10 years, though these coins will still be made for coin collectors. During this time, the Government Accountability Office will study the effects of this suspension, including cost savings and how rounding prices might affect purchases. The study will help decide if coin production should stop permanently, resume, or continue to be on hold.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 1270 is a bill introduced in the United States House of Representatives that proposes a temporary halt in the production of pennies and nickels for a period of ten years. This measure aims to reduce costs associated with coin production, as the expenses often surpass the monetary value of the coins themselves. The bill, however, allows for the continued production of these coins for collectors. All existing pennies and nickels will remain as legal tender. Additionally, the bill mandates a study by the Comptroller General to evaluate the effects of suspending coin production, considering factors such as financial savings and the implications on cash transactions.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill brings up a few important issues that merit consideration:
Study Duration and Impact: The provision allowing up to three years for the completion of the study might be excessively long. This delay could stall decisions that have significant financial ramifications, potentially affecting taxpayers and federal cost-efficiency efforts.
Lack of Clear Criteria: There is an absence of specific metrics or criteria to guide the study on whether the production of these coins should remain suspended, conclude permanently, or resume. Without clear guidelines, the study's conclusions might lack focus and could lead to biased or unclear recommendations.
Impact on Consumers: The decision to round cash transactions up or down to the nearest ten cents could unfairly impact consumers, particularly those dependent on cash for everyday purchases. The bill does not delineate mechanisms to manage or mitigate negative effects arising from such rounding practices.
Ambiguities in Provisions: Language in the bill, particularly regarding the production and sale of coins for collectors, includes terms that could lead to varying interpretations. Terms like "appropriate" or references to unspecified "general provisions" could result in legal and practical ambiguities, complicating implementation.
Public Impact
Broadly, the suspension of penny and nickel production is likely to have both positive and negative implications for the public. On the positive side, it could result in financial savings for the government by reducing the costs associated with minting coins that cost more to produce than their face value. These savings could, in theory, be redirected towards other public services or deficit reduction.
Conversely, the act of rounding cash transactions could disproportionately affect certain demographic groups, notably those who rely heavily on cash for daily transactions, such as low-income individuals or older adults. Rounding could lead to a perceived or real financial disadvantage, particularly if transactions are consistently rounded up.
Stakeholder Impact
For specific stakeholders, the bill presents various implications:
Numismatic Collectors: Collectors might face changes in the availability and production of new penny and nickel coins, though the bill does provide measures to continue production for this group. Yet, ambiguities in the bill's language might impact how collections are maintained or valued.
Retailers and Consumers: Rounding practices at the point of sale could complicate cash transactions, requiring updates to payment systems and staff training. The impact on consumers could range from negligible to significant, depending on transaction volumes and the rounding method applied.
Federal Institutions: The Comptroller General and associated federal offices face the task of providing a comprehensive study within the prescribed timeline. The study's results will influence legislative and financial decision-making processes, highlighting the need for thorough and timely analysis.
Overall, the bill aims to address inefficiencies, but it requires careful consideration of its broader economic and social implications to ensure fair and effective implementation.
Issues
The timeline for the GAO study to be completed is set to 'not later than 3 years,' which might be unnecessarily long and could delay important decision-making related to the suspension of penny and nickel production. This is particularly relevant given the potential financial implications associated with continued production or suspension. (Section 2)
The bill lacks explicit criteria or metrics to guide the GAO study on whether the suspension, permanent cessation, or reinstatement of penny and nickel production is advisable. This lack of specificity could result in an unclear or biased report, affecting legislative decision-making. (Section 2)
The decision to round cash purchases up or down could affect consumers differently, especially those reliant on cash transactions. The bill does not outline how this would be managed or mitigated for potential negative financial impacts on consumers, which raises ethical and financial concerns. (Section 2)
The methodology for determining 'net receipts' as mentioned in Section 1(b)(3) could be clarified further to explain how the 'appropriate share of fixed costs of production' is calculated, ensuring transparency and avoiding misinterpretations which could have financial implications. (Section 1)
Subsection (b)(2) of Section 1 refers to sales 'in accordance with other general provisions governing numismatic coins' but fails to specify what these provisions are, potentially leading to ambiguities in governance and execution. This could be legally significant. (Section 1)
The term 'appropriate' in Section 1(b)(1) is ambiguous and could lead to varying interpretations regarding the quantity of coins to be produced for numismatic collectors, potentially affecting collector markets and legal clarity. (Section 1)
There is no mention of any public consultation process or stakeholder engagement in the GAO study, which might reduce the inclusiveness and comprehensiveness of the findings and could be politically significant by excluding voices of potential stakeholders. (Section 2)
The language throughout Section 1 could be perceived as overly complex due to legal and financial jargon, making it difficult for individuals not versed in these areas to understand the implications, potentially affecting public perception and trust. (Section 1)
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Saving taxpayers money by suspending production of the penny and nickel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes to temporarily stop making pennies and nickels for ten years, except for collectors' coins. These collector coins will be sold to cover their production costs, while any pennies and nickels made before the suspension remain legal money in the U.S.
2. GAO study on the effects of the suspension of production of the penny and nickel Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a study to be conducted by the Comptroller General of the United States, in consultation with various officials, on the impacts of halting the production of the penny and nickel. Within three years, a report must be submitted to specific congressional committees detailing whether the suspension should continue or end, considering financial savings and the effects on cash transactions.