Overview
Title
An Act To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes.
ELI5 AI
The bill lets American Indian tribes lease their special land for up to 99 years, meaning they can let others use their land for a long time, which was decided by the people in charge in Washington, D.C.
Summary AI
H. R. 1246 allows for the leasing of land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes for up to 99 years. This bill amends a previous act from August 9, 1955, to include land from any Indian tribe on a list published by the Secretary under the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. The bill was received by the Senate and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill under consideration, H.R. 1246, aims to authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes. This is achieved by amending an existing law from August 9, 1955, to include various tribes recognized by the Secretary of the Interior.
General Summary
The primary purpose of this legislation is to extend leasing authority for land held in trust to a broader group of federally recognized tribes. Currently, this authority applies to the Chehalis Reservation, and the amendment seeks to encompass other tribes included in the federally recognized Indian Tribes list, as published by the Secretary of the Interior. This change could potentially allow these tribes more flexibility in how they manage and utilize their land resources.
Significant Issues
The legislation raises several important issues:
Complex Legal Language: The bill's language may be challenging for individuals not familiar with legal terminology. Understanding the implications of the amendment might necessitate legal expertise, which could limit accessibility.
Detailed Statutory References: The reference to specific statutes, such as the Act of August 9, 1955, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, might require further context for those not well-versed in legislative language, potentially reducing transparency.
Potential Favoritism: There is a concern regarding potential favoritism, as the amendment applies to tribes listed by the Secretary. There is ambiguity about whether other unlisted tribes would receive the same opportunities, which could present fairness issues.
Lack of Clarity on Tribe Listing: The bill does not explain how the list of recognized tribes is determined or updated. This omission is critical as it affects which tribes can access the leasing authority, possibly leading to conflated eligibility issues.
Uncertain Practical Implications: The actual impact of the amendment, especially concerning the leasing authority itself, is not immediately apparent, which could result in misunderstandings about the bill's real-world significance.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, this bill primarily addresses administrative processes concerning trust lands managed by Indian tribes. If enacted, there could be broader economic impacts if tribes use this leasing authority to facilitate long-term projects or partnerships with non-tribal entities, potentially leading to economic development on tribal lands.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
- Federally Recognized Tribes: For tribes included on the Secretary's list, the bill provides an opportunity for enhanced control over their land assets, allowing them to engage in long-term leases that could foster economic growth and stability.
Negative Impacts:
Unrecognized or Unlisted Tribes: The amendment might disadvantage tribes not on the recognized list, raising concerns about equitable treatment and opportunities for all tribal communities.
Legal and Administrative Entities: There could be increased administrative and legal workloads to accommodate longer leases and the evaluation of which tribes are eligible under the amended law.
In conclusion, while H.R. 1246 seeks to improve the operational flexibility of federally recognized Indian Tribes regarding land trust leases, it also introduces questions about equity and clarity that need addressing to ensure the legislation's fair and effective implementation.
Issues
The amendment's language in Section 1 may be unclear to those unfamiliar with legal terminology, potentially requiring legal expertise to interpret, which could hinder understanding and accessibility to the general public.
The reference in Section 1 to specific statutes, such as the Act of August 9, 1955, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, may require additional context or explanation for those not well-versed in U.S. legislative documents, potentially limiting transparency.
Section 1 raises concerns about potential favoritism, as the amendment might favor tribes on the list published by the Secretary, yet it's unclear if this is intentional or if other tribes not on the list have equitable opportunities, which could lead to ethical concerns about fairness and representation.
Section 1 does not provide information on how the list of tribes is determined or updated, which is critical for understanding eligibility for the leasing authority and may lead to political or legal disputes if not clearly defined.
It is not immediately apparent from Section 1 what the practical implications of the amendment are, especially pertaining to the leasing authority it deals with, which could lead to confusion about the real-world impact and effectiveness of the legislation.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Federally recognized tribe leasing authority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Act of August 9, 1955, allows land held in trust for any Indian tribe listed by the Secretary under the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 to be included in the leasing authority, similar to that already applicable to the Chehalis Reservation.