Overview
Title
An Act To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1246 is a plan that lets certain Native American tribes rent their special land for up to 99 years, so they can have more choices for using their land in the best way.
Summary AI
H. R. 1246 aims to extend the authorization for leases up to 99 years for lands held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes. The bill modifies a previous law by allowing such long-term leases for any Indian tribe listed by the Secretary under the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. This change intends to provide more flexibility and opportunities for tribes in managing and using their lands.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 1246 is a legislative proposal that seeks to extend the leasing authority for land held in trust for federally recognized Indian Tribes. Specifically, it amends an existing law—the Act of August 9, 1955—to allow such leases for up to 99 years, expanding this ability to include land held in trust for any Indian tribe listed by the Secretary of the Interior under the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. Historically, this leasing authority was initially applicable to the Chehalis Reservation, but H.R. 1246 broadens it to encompass a wider range of tribes.
Significant Issues
A key issue with this bill is the potential lack of clarity for those not familiar with legal jargon and the intertwining references to other statutes, such as the Act of August 9, 1955, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994. These references may necessitate expert legal knowledge to fully understand the bill's implications.
Another significant concern is regarding the inclusivity and fairness of the leasing authority. The amendment extends rights to tribes listed by the Secretary of the Interior, but it does not explicitly address how tribes are chosen for this list or how frequently it is updated, leading to potential questions about transparency and equal treatment.
Impact on the Public
The bill may have broad impacts by potentially unlocking long-term leasing opportunities for Indian tribes, which could lead to economic development and greater autonomy over land utilization. By extending lease terms, tribes could attract more significant investment projects that require longer commitment periods, possibly leading to job creation and enhanced infrastructure within these communities.
However, the complexity of the legislative language might limit public engagement and understanding, meaning that those who wish to comprehend or contest the bill's provisions may face significant barriers without legal assistance. This complexity could also contribute to misinterpretations about the bill's intentions and outcomes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For federally recognized Indian Tribes, H.R. 1246 could serve as a positive development by providing them with increased flexibility to manage their lands effectively and engage in long-term planning. This could empower tribes to develop culturally and economically valuable projects that align with their goals and interests, promoting self-determination.
Conversely, tribes that are not listed, or who do not understand the eligibility criteria due to unclear guidelines, may feel excluded, potentially exacerbating issues of fairness. Furthermore, the lack of procedural details about the determination process for the eligible tribe list might lead to concerns regarding equitable treatment and transparency, which could affect trust between tribal entities and the federal government.
Understanding and addressing these issues will be a critical step toward ensuring the bill's successful implementation and its efficacy in supporting the interests of Indian tribes across the nation.
Issues
The amendment's language may be unclear to those unfamiliar with legal terminology, potentially requiring legal expertise to interpret, which could limit public understanding and engagement. This concern relates to Section 1.
The reference to specific statutes, such as the Act of August 9, 1955, and the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, may require additional context or explanation for those not well-versed in U.S. legislative documents, impacting stakeholders' ability to fully understand the bill. This issue is tied to Section 1.
It is not immediately apparent what the practical implications of the amendment are, especially pertaining to the leasing authority it deals with, which could lead to uncertainty in its implementation and effects. This relates to Section 1.
The amendment might potentially favor tribes on the list published by the Secretary, but it is unclear if this is intentional or if other tribes not on the list have equitable opportunities. This could result in issues of fairness and equality. This relates to Section 1.
The text does not provide information on how the list of tribes is determined or updated, which might be critical for understanding eligibility for the leasing authority and ensuring transparency in the process. This concern relates to Section 1.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Federally recognized tribe leasing authority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Act of August 9, 1955, allows land held in trust for any Indian tribe listed by the Secretary under the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 to be included in the leasing authority, similar to that already applicable to the Chehalis Reservation.