Overview

Title

An Act To direct the Librarian of Congress to promote the more cost-effective, efficient, and expanded availability of the Annotated Constitution and pocket-part supplements by replacing the hardbound versions with digital versions.

ELI5 AI

The bill is like telling a library to put a special book of important rules and updates online instead of making new books every time, so people can read it on the internet instead of needing a physical copy. This way, it saves paper and money, but some people worry about how they will read it if they don't have the internet.

Summary AI

H.R. 1234 aims to make the Annotated Constitution and its supplementary materials more accessible and cost-effective by shifting from hardbound books to digital versions. This bill modifies the existing law so that revised editions of the Annotated Constitution and its supplements, updated every ten years and every Supreme Court term, respectively, are provided digitally by the Library of Congress. The digital versions will be publicly accessible on the Library's website, and additional printing mandates are repealed to save resources and promote efficiency.

Published

2025-03-31
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Engrossed in House
Date: 2025-03-31
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1234eh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
746
Pages:
6
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 216
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 52
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 28
Entities: 70

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.44
Average Sentence Length:
74.60
Token Entropy:
4.60
Readability (ARI):
40.25

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The bill, titled "H. R. 1234," proposes to modernize the availability of the Annotated Constitution and its supplements by transitioning from hardbound to digital formats. The Librarian of Congress is tasked with replacing printed versions with digital ones, to be updated every ten years, and providing cumulative supplements after each Supreme Court term. These digital versions will be accessible for free on the Library of Congress's website, effectively eliminating the need for additional printed copies after 2025.

Significant Issues

One primary issue is accessibility. The shift from hardbound to digital formats may limit access for those without reliable internet or who prefer physical copies. While digital access is generally considered more efficient, it may inadvertently exclude people who rely on traditional means. Another concern is the lack of oversight mechanisms specified in the bill, which could raise questions about the reliability and accuracy of these digital documents.

Moreover, the frequency of updates—every ten years for the main document and annually for supplements—might not keep pace with the need for timely legal information, particularly if the Supreme Court issues numerous significant decisions. Additionally, while the environmental benefits of reducing paper use are notable, there is a potential trade-off with transparency if digital access isn't straightforward and user-friendly.

Impact on the Public

The transition to digital-only publications could offer broader and more convenient access to important legal resources for many but may disadvantage those with limited digital access or skills. It encourages sustainability by reducing paper usage and storage needs, potentially lowering costs in the long run.

For the legal community, the bill could streamline the process of accessing updated constitutional annotations, although the infrequency of updates and lack of oversight may concern those who rely on this information for timely legal advice and decision-making.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For libraries and educational institutions, digital access may reduce operational costs associated with acquiring and storing hardbound volumes. However, they might also face challenges with ensuring fair digital access for all patrons, particularly in underserved areas.

Legal professionals and scholars may benefit from the potentially lower costs and enhanced access to updated legal interpretations, though they might face challenges related to the reliability and timeliness of updates. For the general public, while some may appreciate the environmental benefits and ease of digital access, others might encounter difficulties engaging with the material without adequate digital literacy or internet access.

In summary, while the bill aims to modernize and enhance access to the Annotated Constitution, it presents significant challenges related to accessibility, oversight, and the timeliness of updates that must be addressed to ensure equitable benefits for all stakeholders.

Issues

  • The transition from hardbound to digital formats, as outlined in Section 1, could raise concerns about accessibility for individuals without reliable internet access or those who prefer physical copies, potentially limiting access to critical legal resources.

  • The bill's lack of specification of oversight mechanisms in Section 1 might lead to issues with ensuring quality and accuracy of digital documents by the Librarian of Congress, affecting content reliability which is crucial for legal and public trust.

  • The designated frequency of updates for the digital versions, mentioned in Section 1, may not be adequate to keep the legal community and the public informed about significant Supreme Court decisions, raising concerns about the timeliness and relevancy of updates.

  • Section 1 addresses environmental benefits by eliminating mandatory printing, yet it may pose a risk of reduced transparency if user-friendly digital access isn't implemented effectively for public understanding.

  • The bill's language in Section 1 regarding the transition to digital formats is highly technical, potentially making it difficult for laypersons to comprehend without additional context, hindering public understanding and engagement.

  • In Section 1, the potential hidden costs associated with transitioning to digital-only publications, such as digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, and maintenance, are not addressed, which might have financial implications for the Library of Congress.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Repeal requirement for Congressional Research Service to prepare Annotated Constitution and supplements in hardbound version Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Librarian of Congress to create digital versions of the Constitution Annotated and its supplements instead of hardbound copies, with updates every ten years and more frequent cumulative supplements. These digital versions will be accessible on the Library of Congress's public website, eliminating the need for printing extra copies after 2025.