Overview
Title
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to address measuring methane emissions, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1217 wants to make changes to how we check for a gas called methane coming from old wells. States can choose to check for this gas, and a big group of scientists will study how fixing these wells helps local areas.
Summary AI
H. R. 1217 aims to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to address the measurement of methane emissions related to orphan wells. The bill clarifies that states are not required to measure methane emissions to be eligible for grants under the Act, but they may choose to collect such data. It also calls for a study by the National Academies on the effects of plugging these wells on local economic development, housing, and environmental benefits. The study's findings are to be reported to Congress using already available funds.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
This legislative act seeks to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005, focusing specifically on measuring methane emissions related to orphan wells. The bill, titled the "Orphan Well Grant Flexibility Act of 2025," introduces changes that can impact how states qualify for federal grants aimed at plugging and remediating orphan wells. Furthermore, the bill mandates a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to assess the community impacts of these activities, such as economic development and housing trends.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues addressed in this bill involves how states are permitted, rather than mandated, to measure methane emissions as part of their eligibility for federal grants. This flexibility might lead to inconsistencies in data accuracy across different states, impacting the policy's overall effectiveness. Another significant concern revolves around the proposed study by the National Academies, which might limit the involvement of other capable organizations, potentially introducing bias. Additionally, the lack of detail on how states are to be selected for the study raises questions about representation and the comprehensiveness of the results. Finally, utilizing existing funds without disclosing the specific amount could lead to financial ambiguity and concern about the impact on other Interior Department priorities.
Impact on the Public Broadly
The bill could broadly affect the public by potentially improving the efficiency and effectiveness of federal grant programs aimed at addressing methane emissions from orphaned wells. If the measures included work as intended, they could contribute to better environmental outcomes, such as reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved water quality. However, the lack of mandatory procedures in emission measurement may lead to uneven implementation across states, potentially reducing the overall effectiveness of the legislation in tackling environmental concerns.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For states, the bill's provisions could offer both opportunities and challenges. The flexibility in measuring methane emissions and the opportunity to use pre- and post-plugging data offer states more control over their grant-related activities, potentially allowing for innovative and cost-efficient approaches. However, this could also lead to disparities between states in data accuracy and environmental outcomes, posing challenges in establishing a consistent national strategy.
For federal agencies, particularly the Department of the Interior, the redirection of existing funds without clear allocation details may strain resources and affect other departmental programs. Meanwhile, the exclusive involvement of the National Academies in conducting the study could sideline other organizations that might offer diverse insights or methodologies.
Overall, while the bill aims to provide states with greater autonomy and flexibility, these features come with trade-offs that must be carefully managed to ensure the program's objectives in environmental protection and economic development are met successfully.
Issues
The language in Section 2 allowing States the option ('may, but are not required to') to conduct pre-plugging or post-plugging monitoring activities might lead to inconsistencies and disparities in data accuracy and policy implementation across states, impacting overall program effectiveness and potentially undermining efforts to measure and reduce methane emissions.
Section 3's stipulation that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct the study on community impacts could limit participation of other qualified organizations, potentially introducing bias or lack of diverse methodological approaches.
The lack of a specified timeline for the completion of the study agreement in Section 3 could delay the assessment of community impacts of the orphaned well grant program, thereby delaying potential improvements or policy adjustments.
Section 3 does not specify how states will be selected for the study, which raises concerns about potential selection bias and lack of representation of all regions in the United States, possibly affecting the comprehensiveness of the study's findings.
The provision in Section 3(e) to use existing funds without specifying the amount raises concerns about budgetary transparency and how these efforts might impact other priorities funded by the Department of the Interior, potentially leading to funding shortfalls or misallocation of resources.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Orphan Well Grant Flexibility Act of 2025 is the official name of this legislative act.
2. Pre-plugging methane emissions for grant eligibility Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 clarifies that states are not required to measure methane emissions or perform certain other activities to qualify for federal grants. It also allows for the use of estimates from pre-plugging or post-plugging data for emissions evaluations, which can be funded through these grants.
3. National Academies study on community impact of orphaned well grant program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Interior is tasked with arranging a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to investigate the community impacts of plugging and remediating orphaned wells under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, including aspects like economic development and housing trends. The study must draw input from diverse U.S. regions, involve consultations with federal bodies like the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the findings are to be reported to Congress using existing funds.