Overview

Title

To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand the scope of the prohibition against video voyeurism.

ELI5 AI

The "Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025" wants to make the rules stronger against people sneaking videos of others without them knowing, by making the punishments tougher and covering more places and situations. It tries to make sure that people who do this can get in trouble even if they use things like the internet or travel from one place to another.

Summary AI

H.R. 1203, known as the "Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025," seeks to amend title 18 of the United States Code to broaden the prohibition against video voyeurism. The bill proposes to increase the maximum punishment for video voyeurism from one year to five years in prison. It also expands the circumstances under which video voyeurism is prohibited, including situations involving interstate or foreign travel, use of commerce-related channels or facilities, and any form of payment related to the offense. Additionally, the bill outlines specific scenarios that would fall under federal jurisdiction, such as activities occurring in U.S. territories or affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

Published

2025-02-11
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-11
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1203ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
600
Pages:
4
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 150
Verbs: 51
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 21
Entities: 33

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.13
Average Sentence Length:
85.71
Token Entropy:
4.43
Readability (ARI):
44.23

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 1203, titled the “Stop Victimizers and Offenders from Yielding Explicit Unconsented Recordings Surreptitiously Act of 2025“ or the “Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025,” seeks to amend Title 18 of the United States Code. This bill intends to expand the existing prohibition against video voyeurism, which involves unauthorized recording of individuals without their consent. The proposed amendments include extending the maximum imprisonment term from one year to five years and broadening the circumstances under which these offenses can be prosecuted, particularly when involving interstate or foreign commerce.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary issues with the bill is its title, which is long and potentially cumbersome. While it captures the bill's intent to stop unauthorized recordings, it may prove difficult for the general public to remember or understand. Simplifying the title could improve communication and public engagement with the legislation.

The bill's language is heavily reliant on legal and technical terms, especially concerning "interstate or foreign commerce," which might be challenging for people without a legal background to understand. This complexity could hinder comprehension and compliance among citizens who are not trained to interpret legal documents.

The bill lacks explicit references to budgetary considerations. Without clear financial implications, it may be challenging for taxpayers and policymakers to assess potential costs or savings arising from the law's implementation.

Impact on the Public

The bill, if passed, would likely have a broader influence on privacy rights by attempting to safeguard people against unauthorized recordings, a growing concern with advancing technology. By extending the legal framework and increasing penalties, the law aims to deter would-be offenders who exploit technologies for nefarious purposes.

However, the potential for misunderstanding judicial or jurisdictional terms could lead to a lack of awareness and subsequent non-compliance with the law by the general public. Additionally, without specific financial allocations or implications, the legislation might not fully account for the resources required for effective enforcement, potentially affecting the efficiency of its implementation.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For potential offenders, the bill poses a significant deterrent with heightened penalties. This could lead to a decline in voyeuristic activities, thereby enhancing privacy protection.

On the other hand, legal professionals, judicial entities, and law enforcement agencies will bear the responsibility for understanding and enforcing the newly expanded prohibitions. They might face challenges related to clarity and interpretation, necessitating additional training or resources.

Moreover, technology companies, especially those dealing with communications or video recording, might have to adopt stricter regulations and guidelines to prevent misuse of their platforms, potentially incurring operational costs or requiring policy adjustments.

Overall, while the bill proposes to expand important legal protections against privacy violations, understanding and implementing these protections effectively will require careful navigation of the bill's legal intricacies and potential budgetary demands.

Issues

  • The title 'Stop Victimizers and Offenders from Yielding Explicit Unconsented Recordings Surreptitiously Act of 2025' is lengthy and could be simplified for better clarity and ease of reference. The acronym 'Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025' suggests a specific focus on voyeurism, which could lead to ambiguity if the Act intends to address broader issues; the scope should be clearly defined within the Act. (Section 1)

  • The section text on expanded prohibition against video voyeurism is largely focused on legal and jurisdictional language, which may be complex and difficult to understand for individuals without a legal background. This could hinder public understanding and compliance. (Section 2)

  • There is no direct mention of spending or financial allocations in the bill, making it unclear if there are any budgetary implications or potential for wasteful spending which might concern taxpayers. (Section 2)

  • The use of technical terms related to interstate or foreign commerce might be confusing for those unfamiliar with legal or commercial legislation, potentially leading to ambiguity and misinterpretation. (Section 2)

  • The phrase 'instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce' is repeated several times within the legal text, which could be simplified or clarified to improve understanding, especially for the general public. (Section 2)

  • The section outlining specific legal amendments does not provide any context or examples, which might be necessary to fully understand the practical implications of these amendments and ensure effective enforcement. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The short title of this legislation is the "Stop VOYEURS Act of 2025." It aims to address issues related to unauthorized recordings made surreptitiously.

2. Expanded prohibition against video voyeurism Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section expands the prohibition against video voyeurism by increasing the maximum imprisonment from 1 year to 5 years and defining the circumstances under which it applies, including situations involving interstate or foreign commerce, payments, communications, and specific jurisdictions of the United States.