Overview
Title
To prohibit COVID–19 vaccination mandates, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to make sure no one is forced to get a COVID-19 shot by the government, and that people don't have to show a vaccine card to use government buildings or services. It also says that groups getting government money can't demand people get vaccinated, or they'll have to give the money back if they do.
Summary AI
H. R. 120 is a proposed bill that seeks to stop any government agency from issuing rules that require people to get a COVID-19 vaccine. It also aims to ensure that no proof of vaccination is needed to access federal properties or services. Additionally, organizations that have received COVID-19 relief funds or future federal funds cannot require individuals to be vaccinated as a condition for receiving services. If an organization fails to comply, it must return all government funds it received.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, known as the "No Mandates Act" (H.R. 120), seeks to prohibit federal agencies from issuing mandates for COVID-19 vaccinations and restricts entities that receive federal funds from imposing vaccination requirements. Introduced to the House of Representatives on January 3, 2025, the bill is under consideration by several committees, including Oversight and Government Reform, House Administration, and Energy and Commerce.
General Summary
The bill consists of three main actions:
Prohibition on Federal Agency Mandates: Federal agencies would be barred from creating rules or guidelines mandating COVID-19 vaccines.
Federal Access Without Vaccination Proof: Access to federal properties, services, and congressional grounds would not require proof of COVID-19 vaccination.
Federal Funding Restrictions: Entities receiving federal funds, including those from COVID-19 relief packages, would be prohibited from mandating COVID-19 vaccinations as a condition for service provision. Non-compliance may result in the requirement to return the federal funds received.
Significant Issues
Several concerns arise from the bill's language and implications:
Public Health Concerns: By permanently prohibiting agencies from issuing vaccine mandates, the bill could hinder responses to future health crises, not only for COVID-19 but also for other emergent diseases.
Enforcement and Clarity: The lack of specifications on how these prohibitions will be enforced creates potential ambiguity. Particularly in the context of proving vaccination status for federal access and the wide scope of 'federal services,' consistency across different federal properties and services could become challenging.
Broad Language in Funding Restrictions: The stipulations against entities that receive federal funding might be overly broad, potentially affecting a range of organizations, including those obligated under other laws to implement health safety measures, creating conflicts with existing mandates.
Impact on the Public
Broadly speaking, the bill could shape the landscape of public health and safety policies in the U.S. by restricting federal authority in health governance. This might reassure individuals concerned about government overreach and personal autonomy regarding health decisions. However, it could also leave public health systems less equipped to deal with health crises effectively.
Impact on Stakeholders
Public Health Agencies: The limitations could impede the ability of health officials to mandate vaccinations in future outbreaks, possibly affecting their capacity to ensure public safety.
Federal-Funded Entities: From universities to transportation entities receiving federal aid, the bill might restrict their operations if they cannot impose vaccination requirements, potentially impacting their ability to provide safe environments.
General Public: While some individuals may perceive this bill as a protection of personal freedoms, others might feel their safety is compromised, especially those with underlying health conditions reliant on herd immunity for protection.
In summary, the "No Mandates Act" presents a complex shift in the management of public health policy, balancing individual freedoms against collective safety concerns. Its implications are far-reaching, with potential benefits in personal autonomy but clear risks to public health efficacy and organizational governance.
Issues
The prohibition on agencies issuing COVID-19 vaccination mandates could lead to public health concerns in the event of future pandemics or similar health crises (Section 2).
The definition of 'agency' in Section 2 relies on external legal documents, which may necessitate further interpretation and could cause confusion for those not familiar with the United States Code.
The prohibition on requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination for federal access (Section 3) lacks clarity on execution and enforcement, which could result in inconsistencies across federal properties and services.
The broad language in Section 4 (Federal funding restrictions) could impact a wide range of entities, including those with statutory obligations to require vaccinations, creating potential conflicts with existing health mandates.
There is no indication as to whether there are exceptions to the prohibitions in Sections 2 and 3, such as for high-risk areas or populations, compromising strategic public health protections.
Subsection 4(a) is potentially overly broad by restricting any entity that receives federal funds from mandating vaccinations, which may affect entities outside of the intended scope.
Section 4(b) lacks sufficient information on the enforcement mechanism for the return of funds, leading to possible financial disputes if an entity unintentionally fails to comply with the vaccination mandate ban.
The scope of 'Federal access' and 'Federal services' in Section 3 is not clearly defined, leading to potential ambiguity and varied interpretations across different federal agencies and services.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes that the official name of the legislation is the “No Mandates Act.”
2. Prohibition on agencies issuing vaccine mandates Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill prohibits any federal agency from creating rules or guidelines that would require individuals to get vaccinated for COVID-19. It also clarifies that "agency" is defined according to section 551 of title 5 of the United States Code.
3. Prohibition on requiring proof of COVID–19 vaccination for Federal access Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A section of this bill prevents anyone from being required to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination to access federal properties, services, or the grounds and services of Congress.
4. Federal funding restrictions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, entities that received federal funds from COVID-19 relief packages or any future federal funds are prohibited from requiring individuals to be vaccinated for COVID-19 in order to receive services. If an entity fails to comply, they must return all federal funds received.