Overview
Title
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to eliminate the United States Agency for International Development.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1196 is a proposed rule that says the government can't use its money to shut down a group called USAID, which helps people in other countries. It also says this rule will check every year to make sure the government is following it.
Summary AI
H. R. 1196 aims to prevent the use of any Federal funds to dismantle or eliminate the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The bill emphasizes that any changes to USAID should follow existing laws, ensure U.S. influence globally, and require an act of Congress to be dissolved. Additionally, it mandates the Secretary of State to certify compliance with this requirement annually for five years and defines the relevant Congressional committees responsible for oversight.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 1196, proposed in the 119th Congress, seeks to safeguard the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) from elimination or structural overhaul funded by federal allocations. Acknowledging USAID's role in maintaining U.S. influence internationally, the bill stipulates that any transformation should adhere to existing legal frameworks, fortify the U.S.'s global stance, deter adversaries from gaining influence, and enhance national security and prosperity. Furthermore, it underscores that only Congress holds the authority to dissolve USAID as an independent entity.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues arise from this bill. Firstly, the use of the term "subsummation" in Section 3(b) might lead to confusion due to its uncommon application in legal contexts. This ambiguity could result in misunderstandings about the bill's intent. Secondly, the inclusion of subjective language, such as making "the United States safer, stronger, and more prosperous," might lead to differing interpretations, thus affecting consensus and support for the bill. Additionally, the bill does not specify what constitutes as attempts to eliminate USAID, creating potential compliance challenges. Another notable concern is the absence of explicit consequences for non-compliance with the certification requirement, possibly weakening the enforcement of the bill.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill aims to ensure the continued functioning of USAID, which plays a crucial role in distributing international aid programs that can benefit global stability and peace, indirectly affecting U.S. national security. By maintaining USAID's operations, it also helps protect the U.S.'s global standing and influence, which can have long-term benefits for the country's economic interests and geopolitical strategies. However, the vague language in some sections may spawn debates over funding and resource allocation, as interpretations of the bill could differ, potentially resulting in policy delays or inefficiencies.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts:
For proponents of international development and foreign aid, this bill represents a significant endorsement of USAID's mission and existence. It provides reassurance to those concerned about the potential dissolution of the agency that USAID will remain a separate and vital part of the U.S. government apparatus dedicated to foreign aid and development. This assurance extends particularly to development organizations and beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid.
Negative Impacts:
On the other hand, stakeholders advocating for government efficiency and cost-reduction might view the bill as restrictive, potentially hindering reforms aimed at reorganizing USAID to optimize its functions or budget. Furthermore, the potential ambiguity regarding what constitutes a prohibited action could result in legal and operational challenges, thus affecting efficient policy implementation and possibly jeopardizing intended improvements.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to protect USAID's status and functions, creating positive implications for foreign aid and U.S. international influence, the challenges posed by certain ambiguities and subjective language may impact its implementation and efficacy. Addressing these issues would be crucial for achieving the intended outcomes of the bill.
Issues
The term 'subsummation' in Section 3(b) is not a commonly used legal term and may cause confusion regarding its precise meaning within the context of this bill, potentially leading to legal challenges or misinterpretations of the bill’s intent.
The phrase 'makes the United States safer, stronger, and more prosperous' in Section 2(1)(D) is subjective and open to interpretation, which could lead to differing opinions on what these outcomes entail, affecting the implementation or support of the bill.
The lack of specification in Section 3(a) about what constitutes attempts to 'eliminate the status of USAID as an independent establishment' may lead to ambiguity in compliance and enforcement, creating legal and operational challenges.
The requirement for the Secretary of State to certify compliance in Section 3(c) lacks specific guidance on the consequences of non-compliance, potentially undermining the accountability and effectiveness of the bill’s enforcement.
The use of the phrase 'soft power' in Section 2(1)(B) might be considered ambiguous, as it can be interpreted in various ways without a clear definition in this context, potentially leading to misunderstandings or inconsistent implementation.
The text in Section 3 does not specify actions for the 'appropriate Committees of Congress' upon receiving certification, which could reduce legislative oversight and accountability in the implementation of the bill.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states that it can be referred to as the “Protect U.S. National Security Act.”
2. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section expresses Congress's view that any changes to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) should follow existing laws, enhance U.S. influence globally, counter opponents' influence, and improve national security and prosperity. Additionally, it states that only Congress can fully dissolve USAID as an independent entity.
3. Prohibition of funds to eliminate USAID Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits using federal funds to dismantle or merge the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) with other entities, ensuring it remains a separate organization. It also requires the Secretary of State to certify compliance with this rule to certain congressional committees annually for five years.