Overview
Title
To direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to require the disclosure of violations of Federal law with respect to human trafficking or alien smuggling, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1168 is a rule that says if a charity wants to get money from the government, it must follow all the rules about not helping bad people bring others into the country illegally. If the charity doesn't follow these rules, they might have to give the money back and could get in trouble with taxes.
Summary AI
H. R. 1168 requires non-profit organizations to disclose any violations of federal laws related to human trafficking and alien smuggling if they want to receive federal funds. Starting 120 days after the enactment, these organizations must certify compliance with the law and have no convictions under relevant sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act. If they fail to meet these criteria, they must repay any federal money received. The bill also mandates the development of compliance strategies by the Department of Homeland Security and introduces penalties, such as the denial of tax exemptions, for organizations not complying with the required certifications.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed bill, H.R. 1168, aims to tighten regulations around federal funding for non-profit organizations to prevent their involvement in human trafficking and alien smuggling. The legislation, named the "Protecting Federal Funds from Human Trafficking and Smuggling Act of 2025," mandates that non-profits certify compliance with federal laws in these areas to be eligible for funds. Moreover, failure to meet these requirements could result in the loss of tax exemptions and an obligation to return previously awarded funds.
General Summary
The act requires non-profits seeking federal funds to certify they are in compliance with laws against human trafficking and alien smuggling. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) would oversee these certifications. Non-compliance could lead to losing federal funding and tax-exempt status. The bill also mandates the publication of compliance statuses to inform the public and establish guidelines for these organizations to prevent violations.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the main issues with the bill is the demanding timeline for compliance. Non-profits must certify their compliance within 60 to 120 days after the bill's enactment, which could be particularly challenging for smaller entities with limited resources. Additionally, there are no clear guidelines on reapplying for tax exemptions once revoked, potentially leading to financial uncertainty and operational difficulties for affected organizations.
The legislation's reporting requirements could lead to reputational harm for non-profits by publicly disclosing violations, regardless of their severity or intention. This lack of due process protections raises ethical concerns. Furthermore, the absence of allocated resources or support for non-profits to meet compliance requirements may disproportionately impact smaller organizations that lack the capacity to promptly adapt to new regulations.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to bolster federal efforts against human trafficking and alien smuggling by ensuring non-profit organizations that receive federal funds are not complicit in these activities. If executed effectively, this legislation could enhance public confidence in how federal funds are utilized, reinforcing trust in non-profit organizations.
However, it also risks undermining the operations of non-profits—especially smaller ones—that may struggle to meet the new requirements. This could inadvertently reduce the availability of essential services these organizations provide to vulnerable populations, including shelter, education, and healthcare, particularly in under-served communities.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Non-profit Organizations: The bill presents clear challenges, mainly in terms of compliance. Larger organizations with more resources may adapt more seamlessly to the new requirements. In contrast, smaller non-profits may experience significant strain, potentially leading to a reduction in their services or even cessation of operations.
Tax and Regulatory Authorities: The bill would increase the burden on the OMB and relevant authorities to monitor compliance, enforce penalties, and potentially handle appeals from non-profits challenging decisions made on compliance grounds. The additional demands could necessitate more resources or staffing.
Public and Service Recipients: Enhanced oversight could increase public trust in non-profits by ensuring that recipients of federal funds abide by the law. Nonetheless, disruptions in non-profit activities could temporarily affect those who rely on their resources and support, possibly leading to gaps in essential services.
In conclusion, while the intent of H.R. 1168 is to ensure federal funds are not misused in illegal activities, significant challenges in implementation and compliance could have broader implications for the non-profit sector and those it serves. Balancing oversight with supportive measures could potentially mitigate negative impacts and support the bill's ultimate goals.
Issues
The timeframe for compliance stipulated in Section 2 is relatively short (60 to 120 days after enactment), which might not be practical for many non-profit entities, especially smaller organizations. This could lead to undue burdens on these entities and might disrupt their operations or even jeopardize their existence.
Section 2(b) introduces amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, denying tax exemptions to organizations not meeting the certification requirements or found violating the relevant sections. However, it does not clarify whether prior compliance issues or those from the past will affect current tax exemption statuses, leading to potential retroactive penalties that could financially harm non-profit entities.
Section 2(a) outlines strict consequences for non-compliance, like the repayment of awarded funds and denial of future funding. However, it lacks a clear process for appealing decisions or demonstrating compliance, creating potential for disputes and possible unfair financial penalties.
The requirement in Section 2(c) for the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish information about violations by non-profits could lead to reputational damage even for minor or unintentional infractions. The lack of mention of protections or considerations for due process raises ethical concerns.
There is no mention of funding or resources allocated to non-profit entities in Section 2 to aid in compliance with the new certification requirements. This omission could particularly disadvantage smaller organizations with limited resources.
Section 3 strikes subsection (d) from an existing law but does not provide details on its content, making it unclear what specific changes or impacts this amendment will have, potentially leading to confusion and unintended consequences.
The absence of clear guidelines in Section 2 for re-applying for tax exemption in event of non-compliance could lead to arbitrary decision-making and financial unpredictability for non-profit organizations.
It is unclear in Section 2 how the Office of Management and Budget will determine compliance with complex laws like human trafficking and alien smuggling, which could lead to inconsistent interpretations and applications, creating legal uncertainties for non-profits.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act gives the official short title, which is the “Protecting Federal Funds from Human Trafficking and Smuggling Act of 2025”.
2. Mandatory disclosures of human trafficking and alien smuggling Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires non-profit organizations that want to receive federal funds to certify their compliance with laws against human trafficking and alien smuggling. If they fail to do so, they might lose tax-exempt status or have to return funds, and the government will publish information on violators and work with non-profits to improve compliance.
3. Verification requirement for nonprofit charitable organizations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes a part of a previous law, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, by removing a specific section related to the verification requirements for nonprofit charitable organizations.