Overview
Title
To prohibit the procurement of solar panels manufactured or assembled in the People’s Republic of China.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to stop the U.S. government from buying solar panels from China, but they can still buy them from China if there are no other choices.
Summary AI
H. R. 1167, also known as the “Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025,” aims to stop the U.S. government from buying solar panels made or assembled in China. The bill requires federal guidelines to be set up within 180 days to prevent federal funds from being used for these purchases. However, an exception can be made if it's determined that Chinese entities are the only viable source. The bill also involves reporting requirements to Congress and a study of the domestic solar panel market.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 1167, titled the "Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025," is a proposed law presented to the United States Congress aimed at restricting the procurement of solar panels manufactured or assembled in the People's Republic of China. This legislative effort seeks to develop clear prohibitions on using federal funds for acquiring such solar panels by updating and enforcing new procurement guidelines for executive agencies. Additionally, it allows for specific exemptions under stringent criteria and necessitates reports and studies to assess the broader context of solar panel production and procurement.
Significant Issues
The bill faces several notable challenges. One major issue is the lack of a clear and comprehensive definition of "covered entity," which could lead to ambiguity and inconsistencies in enforcement. This could make it difficult to determine precisely which entities are affected by the prohibition, potentially resulting in legal challenges or loopholes.
Moreover, the absence of specified penalties for non-compliance might reduce the effectiveness of the prohibition, as there is no outlined consequence for executive agencies that fail to adhere to the guidelines. The waiver process intended to provide exemptions appears to lack transparency and objective criteria, which might lead to perceptions of favoritism.
Additionally, the timeline given to implement these prohibitions might be too short for some agencies to effectively develop and enforce the required standards and guidelines. This tight timeline could result in rushed and flawed policy execution.
Impact on the Public
The broader public could see significant implications from this bill, particularly in terms of environmental and economic outcomes. By restricting Chinese solar panels, the bill may encourage domestic production and reliance on alternative international sources, potentially boosting local industry and jobs. However, this could also lead to higher costs for solar panel procurement due to limited supply and competition, ultimately affecting government energy projects and taxpayer expenses.
Impact on Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders, such as federal agencies and domestic manufacturers, may be affected in diverse ways. Federal agencies could encounter operational challenges while adjusting to new procurement rules and might experience increased administrative burdens due to additional reporting and compliance requirements. However, domestic manufacturers could benefit from a reduction in market competition, potentially increasing demand for locally-produced solar products.
On the other hand, international suppliers, particularly those from China, might face restricted access to a significant market segment, leading to potential diplomatic and trade tensions. This could further influence international supply chain dynamics and solar technology advancements worldwide.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to secure national interests and enhance domestic solar industry capabilities, its effectiveness and impact depend significantly on the clarity of its execution and the resolution of its current ambiguities. Careful consideration and potential amendments may be required to address these issues effectively.
Issues
The lack of a clear and comprehensive definition of 'covered entity' in SECTION 2 and SECTION 6 could lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in enforcement, potentially including a wide range of entities without clear guidelines.
SECTION 2 does not mention penalties or consequences for non-compliance with the procurement prohibition, potentially reducing the effectiveness of the bill.
The waiver process described in SECTION 3 may lack transparency and could be subject to favoritism, as decisions are made jointly by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security without specified criteria for approval.
The timeline for implementing the prohibition in SECTION 2 may be too short for certain executive agencies to develop and enforce the required standards and guidelines effectively.
There is no specific mechanism mentioned in SECTION 2 for monitoring or ensuring compliance with the procurement prohibition, which could lead to enforcement challenges.
The Comptroller General report in SECTION 4 lacks clarity on what Congress intends to do with the information gathered, raising questions about the necessity and usefulness of the reporting requirement.
The study described in SECTION 5 lacks specific goals and expected outcomes, which could lead to ineffective study results and concerns about potential wasteful spending.
The definition in SECTION 6 for 'solar panel' does not clarify whether it includes other forms of solar technology, which could create loopholes or misunderstandings regarding the prohibition scope.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill gives it a short name, stating it can be called the “Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025”.
2. Prohibition on procurement of solar panels from covered foreign entities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that within 180 days after the law is enacted, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget must create rules to stop government agencies from using federal money to buy solar panels made by certain foreign companies, and these rules must also prevent using government credit cards for such purchases. Additionally, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council needs to update regulations to enforce this rule for federal contracts and subcontracts.
3. Exemption waiver Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The head of an executive agency can ask for an exemption from a rule if they prove to the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security that a certain company is the only option for solar panels. If they approve, the agency must inform the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, who will report the exemption requests and their status to selected Congressional committees every three months.
4. Comptroller General report Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Comptroller General of the United States is required to deliver a report to Congress within 275 days after the law is enacted, detailing the quantity of solar panels purchased by federal departments and agencies from specified entities.
5. Study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that within a year of the law's enactment, the Office of Management and Budget should contract a study by a research center on the domestic and global solar panel markets and technologies. The study's findings must be submitted to several Congressional committees within 30 days of its completion.
6. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the Act: (1) "covered entity" refers to entities either located in or under the influence of China, as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security; (2) "executive agency" follows the definition in the U.S. Code; and (3) "solar panel" refers to crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells and modules.