Overview
Title
To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from procuring certain foreign-made batteries, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act" is a plan to stop a big part of the government, called Homeland Security, from buying batteries from certain foreign companies, mainly from China, because it might not be safe. They will start doing this in 2027, but if it's really hard to find different batteries or they don't cause any problem, they can sometimes still use them.
Summary AI
H.R. 1166, known as the “Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act,” seeks to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from buying batteries made by certain foreign companies, starting on October 1, 2027. These companies primarily include Chinese firms identified as potential security risks. The bill allows for specific waivers, granted by the Secretary of Homeland Security, if the batteries do not pose a risk or if no suitable alternatives exist. Additionally, a report detailing potential impacts on Homeland Security's operations and costs must be submitted within 180 days of the Act's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act," aims to restrict the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from purchasing batteries from certain foreign entities. The restriction is set to begin on October 1, 2027, and primarily targets companies that are connected to China or are seen as possible threats to national security. A list of these entities is outlined in the bill, and exceptions may be granted for national security reasons or for research purposes. The bill also mandates that a report be delivered to Congress on the impacts of this restriction within 180 days of the bill's enactment.
Summary of Significant Issues
One issue with the bill is the potential impact on battery costs and quality for the DHS. By prohibiting procurement from several large and influential battery manufacturers, the DHS might face higher costs and limited supplier options. This could complicate their operations and procurement processes. Additionally, enforcement of the bill could be complex, particularly in determining whether a battery is "produced by" a prohibited entity, leading to potential ambiguities.
The waiver provisions designed for national security or research purposes could provide scope for circumvention of the central tenets of the bill, especially if not carefully monitored. Moreover, requiring congressional notification only after a waiver has been granted might limit pre-emptive oversight, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the bill reflects ongoing efforts to enhance national security by reducing dependency on foreign entities that are considered adversarial. By pushing for domestic production or procurement from allied nations, this bill seeks to safeguard critical infrastructure and data.
For the public, these efforts might contribute to national security, potentially mitigating risks associated with foreign dependency. However, there might be indirect impacts such as increased costs for DHS operations, which could affect the public if these costs are passed on in some form.
Specific stakeholders include U.S. battery manufacturers who might benefit from less competition from the banned foreign companies, potentially leading to increased market share and economic growth. However, DHS as a stakeholder might face logistical and financial challenges, particularly in adjusting existing supply chains and procurement strategies.
There are also potential implications for foreign diplomatic relationships, given the explicit targeting of specific foreign entities. If not handled diplomatically, these restrictions could impact broader trade relations, possibly leading to retaliatory measures or increased tensions.
Conclusion
The "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act" represents a critical step towards enhancing national security by limiting dependency on foreign-made batteries. While it aims to address legitimate security concerns, it also presents significant logistical and financial challenges for the DHS, potentially impacting both operational efficacy and international relations. Stakeholders across various sectors will need to navigate these changes carefully to balance security needs with operational feasibility and international diplomacy.
Issues
The prohibition on procuring batteries from specific foreign entities could potentially lead to increased costs or reduced quality for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as they might have fewer options for battery suppliers. This is a significant concern as it could impact the efficiency and effectiveness of DHS operations. (Section 2)
The inclusion of many large and influential battery manufacturers on the list of prohibited entities could disrupt existing procurement processes and supply chains for DHS, leading to operational challenges. (Section 2(b))
The complexities and potential ambiguities in enforcement arise from determining whether a battery is 'produced by' a prohibited entity, particularly regarding assessing the majority of components. This could lead to inconsistencies and challenges in the enforcement of the law. (Section 2(c))
The waiver provisions, especially the one relating to research, could be perceived as loopholes. If not closely monitored, they could potentially allow circumvention of the prohibition, undermining the bill's intent. (Section 2(d))
The requirement for congressional notification only after a waiver has been granted means that oversight occurs retrospectively, which might not prevent potentially questionable waivers from being implemented. This could raise concerns about accountability and transparency. (Section 2(d)(3))
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states its official title, which is the “Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act”.
2. Prohibition on availability of funds for procurement of certain batteries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Beginning on October 1, 2027, the Department of Homeland Security is prohibited from using its funds to buy batteries from certain companies, mostly tied to China, unless exceptions are made for national security or research purposes. If exceptions are allowed, Congress must be notified, and a report on how this affects costs and missions across various Homeland Security divisions is required within 180 days of this law's enactment.