Overview

Title

To authorize the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to award formula grants to the States to address gambling addiction, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 1141 is like a big helper plan to give money to states so they can help people who have trouble stopping gambling. It also wants to make sure there's smart thinking and research to help fix this problem better.

Summary AI

H. R. 1141, also known as the "Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act," aims to combat gambling addiction in the United States. It authorizes the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to distribute grants to states to address gambling addiction. Additionally, the National Institute on Drug Abuse is allowed to provide grants for research on the subject. The bill also mandates a report to Congress on the effectiveness of these efforts within three years and sets a budget based on specific tax revenues.

Published

2025-02-07
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-07
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1141ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
578
Pages:
3
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 202
Verbs: 38
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 22
Entities: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.29
Average Sentence Length:
48.17
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
26.51

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act," aims to address the issue of gambling addiction across the United States. Introduced in the House of Representatives, this bill seeks to authorize the Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to distribute formula grants to states specifically to combat gambling addiction. Additionally, the National Institute on Drug Abuse is permitted to give research grants on this subject. Funding for these initiatives is outlined for fiscal years 2025 through 2034, with amounts pegged to a specific tax revenue source. The bill also mandates a report to Congress on its outcomes three years post-implementation.

Summary of Significant Issues

One primary concern is the method of allocating grants to states. The bill uses existing ratios for substance abuse grants, which may not accurately reflect the specific needs of each state regarding gambling addiction. This method could lead to an unfair distribution of resources, with some states potentially receiving more or less funding than necessary.

The lack of clear criteria for the approval of grant applications poses another issue. Without specific guidelines, there could be confusion or perceptions of favoritism in the grant awarding process. This ambiguity might hinder the fair and efficient distribution of funds where they are most needed.

Additionally, the bill proposes reallocating funds if a state does not apply for a grant, which could disadvantage larger states or those with more severe gambling addiction issues by not recalibrating needs effectively.

Furthermore, tying the funding amounts to a proportion of tax revenue could lead to fluctuating funding levels. Any changes in economic conditions or gambling activities could impact the stability and effectiveness of funding for these programs.

Finally, the bill lacks comprehensive measures for evaluating the effectiveness of the funded programs, beyond a mandatory report to Congress. This absence of detailed evaluation criteria might result in inconsistent reporting and insufficient accountability for the use of funds and outcomes.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill aims to provide states with resources to tackle gambling addiction, potentially reducing the societal and personal harms associated with this issue. However, the effectiveness of these efforts will depend on how well the allocation and application processes are managed.

For individuals suffering from gambling addiction, the increased focus and funding could lead to more treatment options and research, potentially offering better recovery resources and support systems.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

States stand to benefit from additional federal funds to address gambling addiction, though some may be disadvantaged by the allocation formula. States with significant gambling issues that do not receive proportional funding may struggle to meet their residents' needs.

Researchers focused on gambling addiction could gain more opportunities and resources to conduct studies, although the lack of specific criteria for research grants might lead to inconsistent investment in high-impact areas.

For policymakers, the bill presents an opportunity to refine how gambling addiction is addressed at the state and federal levels. However, they face the challenge of ensuring fair distribution and effective use of funds without precise application guidelines.

In conclusion, while the bill proposes a significant step towards dealing with gambling addiction, its impact will be influenced by how effectively its provisions are implemented and monitored.

Issues

  • The allocation method for grants to states in Section 2(a)(2) might not accurately reflect the specific needs related to gambling addiction in each state, potentially leading to unfair distribution of resources and underfunding of areas with severe gambling addiction issues.

  • The criteria for determining successful applications for grants in Section 2(a) are not specified, which could lead to ambiguity or perceptions of favoritism in the grant awarding process.

  • The reallocation process for unclaimed funds in Section 2(a)(2)(B) could disadvantage larger states or those with more significant gambling addiction issues by not recalibrating the needs assessment, potentially leading to resource shortages.

  • The bill ties funding amounts in Section 2(d) to a percentage of revenue from a specific tax, which could cause significant fluctuations in available funding depending on economic conditions and gambling activity, affecting program stability and effectiveness.

  • The lack of detailed criteria or priorities for gambling addiction research grants in Section 2(b) could result in ineffective allocation of funds and insufficient focus on high-impact studies, limiting the potential for substantial advancements in addressing gambling addiction.

  • The bill does not provide measures for evaluating the effectiveness of funded programs in Section 2(c), aside from a required report, which could lead to variances in reporting quality and insufficient accountability for the spending and outcomes of the initiatives.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section titled "Short title" states that the official name of the act is the “Gambling Addiction Recovery, Investment, and Treatment Act”.

2. Grants to address gambling addiction Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section outlines grants to help tackle gambling addiction, with funds distributed to States by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and for research by the National Institute on Drug Abuse. It specifies how much money is authorized for these efforts from fiscal years 2025 to 2034, based on tax revenue and requires a progress report to Congress three years after the law is enacted.