Overview
Title
To control the export to the People’s Republic of China of certain technology and intellectual property important to the national interest of the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1122 is a plan to make sure that special technology and ideas from the United States don't go to China if they might be used for things the U.S. doesn't like, such as making military things or doing bad stuff around people's rights.
Summary AI
H.R. 1122 aims to regulate the exportation of specific technologies and intellectual property to China that are considered vital to the United States' national interests. The bill mandates the U.S. President to control these exports and requires the U.S. government to identify technologies that significantly enhance China's military capabilities or are used in human rights violations. It also calls for sanctions against individuals or entities that violate these controls. Additionally, the bill seeks to maintain a list of products supported by China's government that could harm U.S. trade interests or support human rights violations.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the China Technology Transfer Control Act of 2025, seeks to regulate the export of certain technology and intellectual property to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), which the United States considers sensitive to its national interest. The bill outlines various definitions for key terms such as "Chinese person," which includes both individuals and entities connected to China. It also categorizes certain technologies and intellectual property as "covered national interest technology or intellectual property," which are deemed critical to U.S. security. The legislation mandates the U.S. President to enforce these controls and imposes sanctions on those who violate them. Additionally, the bill requires the establishment of a list of certain products influenced by China's "Made in China 2025" policy, believed to displace U.S. exports or be used for human rights violations.
Significant Issues
One of the major concerns with this bill is the broad and vague definitions it contains. For instance, the definition of "covered national interest technology or intellectual property" could lead to subjective interpretation and enforcement, causing potential complications for businesses in the technology sector. Additionally, there are significant concerns regarding enforcement. Although the bill sets specific deadlines for actions and reports, it lacks mechanisms to ensure these deadlines are met, which could undermine its effectiveness.
The bill also gives the President the discretion to waive sanctions based on national security interests, but without clear criteria, this power could be applied inconsistently or be subject to political influence. Furthermore, the method for determining which products receive support under the "Made in China 2025" policy is not clearly outlined, potentially leading to arbitrary decisions affecting international trade.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, this bill is positioned as a measure to protect U.S. national security interests by controlling the export of sensitive technology to China. However, the vague definitions and broad categories could lead to confusion and uncertainty, especially for U.S. businesses involved in technology and intellectual property that might be impacted by these export controls. The public might experience indirect effects through economic implications if these controls alter the dynamics of international trade and business operations, potentially impacting jobs and economic growth.
Impact on Stakeholders
Positive Impacts: The bill aims to protect U.S. national security by limiting technological and intellectual property exchanges that could enhance China's military capabilities or contribute to human rights abuses. For government and defense contractors, this could be viewed as a safeguard that ensures sensitive technologies do not end up bolstering potential adversaries.
Negative Impacts: U.S. businesses, especially those in technology sectors, may face significant compliance challenges due to the lack of clarity over what technologies are included in the export controls. This uncertainty could discourage investment and innovation in sectors that might be perceived as risky. Stakeholders in the international business community might also see these controls as trade barriers, potentially escalating tensions with China and affecting multinational collaborations.
In summary, while the bill seeks to address legitimate concerns about national security and international conduct, its vague definitions and lack of clear enforcement guidelines might hinder its effectiveness, creating potential pitfalls for businesses and stirring international tensions.
Issues
The definition of 'covered national interest technology or intellectual property' in Section 2 is vague and broad, potentially creating ambiguity and leading to subjective enforcement. This could have significant implications for businesses dealing with technology transfer and export compliance.
In Section 4, the bill mandates certain actions and reports within specific timeframes but lacks enforcement mechanisms and accountability measures if these deadlines are not met. This could undermine the effectiveness of the legislation.
Section 5 allows the President to waive sanctions based on national security interests but lacks clear criteria or guidelines for such determinations. This could lead to inconsistent or politically influenced decision-making.
The lack of detail regarding the determination of support under Section 6, as well as the mechanisms for verifying product support by the People's Republic of China, could lead to arbitrary or subjective decision-making, affecting international trade relations.
Section 6 provides a list of industries and products without a mechanism for regular updates, which could lead to outdated regulations as market conditions and technology evolve.
The definitions in Section 2, particularly for 'CHINESE PERSON' and 'FOREIGN PERSON,' are broad and could lead to unintended coverage or exclusion, affecting individuals and entities with dual nationality or complex international structures.
The extensive list of industries and products under Section 6 could inadvertently favor certain organizations or industries outside of China, raising concerns about fairness and potential legal challenges.
The bill text in Section 5(c) relating to importation exceptions could create confusion as it does not comprehensively address how these exceptions interact with the overall objectives of the sanctions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill is about the title of the Act. It allows the law to be officially called the “China Technology Transfer Control Act of 2025.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, several terms are defined: a "Chinese person" is either an individual or entity connected to China, "covered national interest technology or intellectual property" refers to certain technologies or intellectual properties important to U.S. national security, a "foreign person" is anyone not a U.S. person, "knowingly" involves awareness of certain actions or outcomes, "intellectual property" includes various types of protected works like patents and trademarks, "technology" encompasses fields such as AI and biotechnology, and a "United States person" is a U.S. citizen or a U.S.-based legal entity.
3. Sense of Congress Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section expresses that Congress believes while the U.S. wants to exchange cultural and technological knowledge globally, it must remain vigilant. Specifically, it highlights concerns about how China uses these exchanges to benefit its military, threatening U.S. interests.
4. Control of export of covered national interest technology and Intellectual property to People's Republic of China Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section requires the President to regulate the export or transfer of certain important technologies and intellectual property to China, beginning 180 days after the law is enacted. Additionally, it mandates a report by the Secretaries of State and Commerce to Congress within 90 days, evaluating if these controls should be applied under existing export regulations, and calls for the necessary regulations to be set up within 180 days of the law's enactment.
5. Imposition of sanctions with respect to provision to or purchase from People's Republic of China of covered national interest technology and intellectual property Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the President must block and stop any transactions involving property of individuals who, after the legislation's enactment, knowingly deal in important technology or intellectual property related to national interests with China, unless the property is goods. The President can waive these sanctions if it's in the U.S.'s national security interest, and those who violate these rules may face penalties similar to those under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
6. Establishment of list of certain products receiving support from Government of People's Republic of China or used by that government for human rights violations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Trade Act of 1974 requires the United States Trade Representative to compile a list of products from China either receiving government support under the Made in China 2025 policy or used by the Chinese government for human rights violations, including industries like aircraft, semiconductors, and biotechnology. This list must be created within 120 days after the enactment of the China Technology Transfer Control Act of 2025 and updated annually.
183. List of certain products receiving support from Government of People's Republic of China or used by that Government for human rights violations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The China Technology Transfer Control Act of 2025 requires the United States Trade Representative to create an annual list of products from China that either receive government support as part of its Made in China 2025 policy, or are linked to human rights violations by the Chinese government. This list includes various industries such as aviation, automotive, biotechnology, and advanced technologies like quantum computing and artificial intelligence.