Overview
Title
To prohibit the use of DeepSeek by the executive agencies, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1121 is a bill that wants to stop government workers from using a special app called DeepSeek on their work gadgets, unless it's needed for keeping the country safe or catching bad guys. The bill tells a special office to make a plan to remove the app quickly, but with some tricky details about who can still use it and how to keep everything safe.
Summary AI
H.R. 1121, also known as the “No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act,” aims to prevent executive agencies from using the DeepSeek application. The bill mandates the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to create guidelines for removing the DeepSeek app from government tech devices within 60 days of the bill's enactment. These guidelines will include exceptions for national security, law enforcement, and security research, where agencies must implement risk mitigation procedures for any authorized use under these exceptions.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The proposed bill, titled the "No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act," aims to restrict the use of the DeepSeek application by executive agencies within the U.S. government. The legislation, introduced by a bipartisan group of representatives, outlines measures to ensure that the application, along with any successors developed by the company High Flyer, is removed from government systems. The bill sets a 60-day timeline for the necessary standards and guidelines to be developed by involved federal authorities including the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Notably, the bill allows for specific exceptions related to law enforcement, national security, and security research, provided these uses are documented with risk mitigation strategies.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns regarding this bill is its specific focus on a single entity, High Flyer, which raises questions about potential bias or unfair targeting. This level of specificity could trigger legal challenges on the grounds of discrimination against the company. Additionally, the process for developing guidelines lacks clear delegation of responsibilities among federal agencies such as the OMB, CISA, and others, potentially complicating implementation.
The bill's provision for exceptions lacks detailed oversight mechanisms, which could lead to inconsistent application across different agencies. The requirement for these agencies to develop risk mitigation strategies is also vague, risking a lack of uniformity in how these exceptions are handled. Finally, the 60-day timeline for developing standards may be insufficient, risking a rushed process that might compromise thoroughness and effectiveness.
Potential Impact on the Public
This legislation, if enacted, could have both direct and indirect effects on the public. It serves to safeguard sensitive government data and infrastructure from potential vulnerabilities associated with the DeepSeek application. For citizens, this could mean enhanced security of governmental operations, thus boosting public trust in the government's ability to manage technological risks.
However, if the implementation is rushed or the exceptions are not clearly managed, there could be lapses in security, leading to potential data breaches or risks that could eventually impact public safety and privacy.
Impact on Stakeholders
Government Agencies: Executive departments might experience challenges in complying with the new requirements, especially given the tight timeline and potential ambiguities in the directives.
High Flyer: The company, specifically targeted by this bill, may face reputational damage and financial loss if prohibited from government technology systems. This could impact their business operations and market standing.
Law Enforcement and National Security Agencies: These entities might benefit from the exceptions provided, allowing them to continue using DeepSeek if it's critical for their operations. However, lack of detailed guidance could impede their ability to justify and document these exceptions effectively.
Security Researchers: The exceptions for security research hold promise for continued innovation and discovery in safeguarding infrastructure. However, the vague requirements for risk mitigation could inhibit efforts if not clearly defined.
In conclusion, the bill aims to enhance cybersecurity within government systems but requires careful consideration and possible revisions to address the highlighted issues effectively.
Issues
The prohibition on the use of the DeepSeek application specifically targets a single entity, High Flyer, by naming it directly in the definition of 'covered application' in Section 2(a)(1). This singular focus might raise concerns about potential bias or selective targeting of companies, which could have legal or ethical implications.
The process for developing standards and guidelines to remove DeepSeek from executive agency information technology, as outlined in Section 2(b)(1), could lack clarity due to insufficient specification of roles and hierarchy among the involved authorities, namely the OMB, GSA, CISA, DNI, and DoD. This lack of precision could lead to challenges in implementing the bill effectively.
The exceptions for national security, law enforcement, and security research in Section 2(b)(2) lack detailed criteria for application and oversight. This omission introduces ambiguity and the potential for inconsistent interpretation and implementation, which could pose security and legal risks.
Agencies are required to 'develop and document risk mitigation actions' for exceptions as mentioned in Section 2(b)(2)(B). The lack of specificity might result in varied approaches and inconsistency in addressing risks related to the exceptions, impacting the effectiveness of the prohibition.
The 60-day timeline for the development of standards and guidelines, as mandated in Section 2(b)(1), may be insufficient for comprehensive review, coordination, and implementation across multiple executive agencies, potentially leading to rushed and suboptimal outcomes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act provides its short title, stating that it may be referred to as the “No DeepSeek on Government Devices Act.”
2. Prohibition on the use of DeepSeek Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines a plan to ban the use of the DeepSeek application in executive agencies within 60 days of the Act's enactment. It also mentions that exceptions may be made for activities related to law enforcement, national security, and security research, provided that these exceptions are documented with risk mitigation actions.