Overview

Title

To repeal the Department of Agriculture bioenergy subsidy programs and other related subsidy programs.

ELI5 AI

This bill is like saying goodbye to some money helper programs that help farmers make energy. It's saying they don't need these helpers anymore, like turning off a light when you don’t need it.

Summary AI

H.R. 112 is a bill introduced in the House of Representatives that aims to repeal specific bioenergy subsidy programs under the Department of Agriculture. These programs, created as part of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, would be eliminated if the bill is passed. The bill is known as the "Farewell to Unnecessary Energy Lifelines Reform Act of 2025" or the "FUEL Reform Act." It is intended to cut back on what the bill describes as unnecessary energy subsidies.

Published

2025-01-03
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-03
Package ID: BILLS-119hr112ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
222
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 82
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 6
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 8
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.46
Average Sentence Length:
31.71
Token Entropy:
4.37
Readability (ARI):
18.95

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "H. R. 112" introduced in the 119th Congress seeks to repeal certain bioenergy subsidy programs. Specifically, it aims to eliminate Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, which encompasses several subsidy programs involving bioenergy managed by the Department of Agriculture. The legislation has been referred to multiple committees, including Agriculture, Oversight and Government Reform, and Science, Space, and Technology.

Significant Issues

A key concern with this bill is the lack of detailed information on the specific programs that will be impacted by the repeal. This omission makes it challenging for stakeholders and the public to fully understand and evaluate the breadth and depth of the legislative change. Additionally, the bill does not provide a rationale or justification for the repeal, leaving its motivations open to speculation. The absence of a transition plan for those affected by the changes may result in uncertainty for individuals and entities currently benefiting from these subsidies. Furthermore, the use of legal citations without explanation might confuse readers unfamiliar with these references.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill may seem abstract and difficult to digest due to legal jargon and the lack of explicit consequences. If passed, it could alter the landscape of agricultural energy subsidies, potentially affecting energy prices or availability indirectly. Without clear explanations of the bill's intended outcomes, citizens may find it challenging to form informed opinions or responses.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Farmers and Bioenergy Producers: Stakeholders in the farming and bioenergy sectors might face significant uncertainty about their operations and financial planning. The withdrawal of subsidies might lead to increased costs or reduced viability of certain bioenergy initiatives. These sectors might experience disruption unless alternative support systems or markets are established.

Environmental Advocates: For those advocating for renewable energy, this bill may represent a step back from supporting sustainable energy practices. The removal of subsidies could hinder progress in bioenergy development, affecting environmental efforts aimed at reducing reliance on fossil fuels.

Government and Policy Analysts: The bill's ambiguity and lack of explicit justification could make it difficult for analysts and policymakers to clearly assess its long-term economic and environmental impacts. Furthermore, without data or expressed intent, it is challenging to debate its potential efficacy or inefficiencies.

In summary, while the goal of the bill appears to target the elimination of certain energy subsidies, the absence of details, rationale, and transition plans poses significant challenges for understanding the broader implications of such a policy change. The potential effects on stakeholders, ranging from economic disruption to environmental setbacks, highlight the need for more comprehensive legislation and dialogue.

Issues

  • The repeal of Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 in Section 2 lacks specific details on the programs that will be impacted, making it difficult for stakeholders and the general public to understand the full scope and implications of the repeal.

  • Section 2 does not provide any rationale or justification for the repeal of these subsidy programs, which is crucial for stakeholders to understand the motivations and intended outcomes of the legislation.

  • The lack of a transition plan or mention of steps to be taken for entities or individuals affected by the repeal in Section 2 could lead to uncertainty and potential disruption for those currently benefiting from these programs.

  • Referencing the U.S.C. in Section 2 without detailed explanations may render the bill's implications unclear to readers unfamiliar with legal citations, potentially hindering public understanding and engagement.

  • Section 1 focuses only on the short title of the bill without substantive provisions, limiting its utility in auditing for potential issues like wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • The use of the term 'FUEL Reform Act' as noted in Section 1 might not clearly convey the bill's purpose or repercussions to the public, potentially leading to misunderstandings about its objectives and implications.

  • The ambiguity of the word 'Reform' in the title as per Section 1 could present challenges in understanding whether the changes are intended to improve, cut costs, or otherwise adjust the existing bioenergy subsidy programs.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the FUEL Reform Act states that the Act can be officially called the "Farewell to Unnecessary Energy Lifelines Reform Act of 2025" or simply the "FUEL Reform Act".

2. Repeal of Department of Agriculture bioenergy subsidy programs and other related subsidy programs Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section repeals Title IX of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, which includes bioenergy subsidy programs managed by the Department of Agriculture and other related subsidy programs.