Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 3-year recovery period for all race horses.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 1113 is like giving horse owners a special rule to save money on their taxes; it lets them count the cost of their race horses over three years instead of longer, which could make it easier for them to pay less tax each year.

Summary AI

H. R. 1113, known as the “Race Horse Cost Recovery Act of 2025,” aims to change the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow race horse owners to recover their costs more quickly by using a 3-year depreciation period for all race horses. This means that starting from property placed in service after December 31, 2022, the owners can spread out the cost of their race horses over three years for tax purposes. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Barr and Mr. McGarvey and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means.

Published

2025-02-07
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-07
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1113ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
211
Pages:
2
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 68
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 14
Entities: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.82
Average Sentence Length:
35.17
Token Entropy:
4.48
Readability (ARI):
17.27

AnalysisAI

The legislative proposal known as H. R. 1113, introduced during the 119th Congress session in 2025, aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This amendment is designed to modify the depreciation period for race horses, allowing them to be depreciated over three years instead of a longer period. The change would apply to race horses put into service after December 31, 2022. The bill is spearheaded by Mr. Barr and Mr. McGarvey and is currently under consideration by the House Committee on Ways and Means.

General Summary of the Bill

This bill, officially titled the "Race Horse Cost Recovery Act of 2025," proposes a significant change to the tax treatment of race horses. By amending Section 168(e)(3)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code, the legislation seeks to allow race horses to benefit from a three-year recovery period. Essentially, this means that the costs associated with race horses could be recouped more quickly under tax depreciation schedules.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from this legislative proposal. First, there appears to be an implicit preferential treatment granted to the racehorse industry. By singling out race horses for a specific tax depreciation benefit, this bill might be viewed as favoring a narrow segment of agriculture and sports without substantial justification. Furthermore, the bill lacks a clear explanation for why this change is necessary and does not provide data or context that might support the financial or economic necessity of such an amendment.

Additionally, there are potential concerns related to government revenue. The accelerated depreciation schedule could result in reduced federal tax revenues. This revenue loss might not be offset by a corresponding public benefit, and without thorough analysis, such a change could be criticized as fiscally imprudent.

Impact on the Public

The bill's broader impact on the public is potentially limited, given its focus on a specific industry sector. However, the economic implications could ripple outward. A reduction in tax revenues could impact public funding in other areas unless counterbalanced by increased economic activity stemming from a revitalized racehorse industry. Whether such economic growth will occur as a direct result of this legislative change remains speculative.

Impact on Stakeholders

The racehorse industry stands to benefit significantly from this legislative change. By reducing the recovery period for depreciation to three years, businesses and individuals involved in owning, training, and racing these horses could see improved cash flow and tax benefits, allowing for reinvestment or expansion within the industry.

On the other hand, other sectors might perceive this proposal as an unfair advantage, potentially sparking calls for similar benefits for additional industries. Moreover, stakeholders concerned with fiscal responsibility may argue that the benefits to the racehorse industry do not justify the potential loss of tax revenue for the federal government.

In summary, while the Race Horse Cost Recovery Act of 2025 could offer financial relief to the horse racing sector, it raises concerns about preferential treatment, revenue loss, and the potential lack of broader public benefit. As the bill progresses, these issues will likely be scrutinized and debated by policymakers and stakeholders alike.

Issues

  • The bill provides a specific tax advantage by allowing a 3-year recovery period for race horses, which could be seen as favoring the racehorse industry without providing sufficient justification for this preferential treatment. (Section 2)

  • There is a potential concern about government revenue loss due to the specific tax depreciation benefit offered to race horses, which might not have a clear corresponding public benefit. (Section 2)

  • The language of the bill lacks context for why race horses specifically are given this depreciation benefit, leaving the change open to accusations of preferential treatment based on unclear criteria. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section establishes that the official title of the legislation is the "Race Horse Cost Recovery Act of 2025."

2. Three-year depreciation for race horses Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the bill, it states that race horses will be classified for tax purposes in a way that allows them to be depreciated over three years. This change applies to any race horse put into service after December 31, 2022.