Overview

Title

To provide for the use of funds for deportation purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 1088 is a plan to let the President use money to send people who are not allowed to live in the U.S. back to their home countries, even if the rules said not to use the money before.

Summary AI

H.R. 1088 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress, proposing that funds, previously paused by Executive Order 14169, be made available for the deportation of illegal aliens from the United States. The bill is referred to as the "Restoring American Sovereignty Act" and was introduced by several representatives, including Mr. Ogles. Its aim is to allow the President to use these funds to carry out deportation activities, overriding existing law that paused their use. The bill is currently under review by the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary.

Published

2025-02-06
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-02-06
Package ID: BILLS-119hr1088ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
227
Pages:
2
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 75
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 9
Entities: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.12
Average Sentence Length:
28.38
Token Entropy:
4.43
Readability (ARI):
15.60

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled "Restoring American Sovereignty Act" (H.R. 1088) was introduced to the 119th Congress. Its primary aim is to facilitate the use of funds for deportation purposes in the United States. The bill permits funds, previously paused by Executive Order 14169, to be made available for deporting individuals labeled as "illegal aliens" from the country. Despite any other laws, the President is granted the discretion to use these funds. The bill is currently under consideration by the Committee on Foreign Affairs and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from this bill, particularly from Section 2:

  1. Lack of Oversight: The bill grants the President discretion to use funds without specific limitations or oversight, risking unchecked executive spending and an expansion of presidential power without necessary checks and balances. This could lead to significant financial implications.

  2. Language Concerns: The term "illegal aliens" used in the bill is considered by many to be outdated and potentially insensitive. This terminology could spark controversy or misinterpretation and may influence the bill's reception.

  3. Ambiguity: There is a lack of clarity regarding how the funds "paused pursuant to Executive Order 14169" will be identified or quantified. This ambiguity could complicate the bill's implementation and create oversight challenges.

  4. Lack of Transparency in Deportation Process: The bill does not detail the deportation criteria or process, which could lead to transparency and accountability issues. This might raise ethical concerns regarding how deportation decisions are made and potentially impact immigrant communities.

  5. Absence of Reporting Requirements: There is no mention of audits or reporting requirements to ensure the funds are used appropriately. This lack of accountability measures could lead to the misuse of public resources.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Public Impact

Broadly, the bill could significantly impact how immigration enforcement is conducted in the United States. If enacted, it could lead to increased deportations, potentially affecting immigrant communities and their families. The financial implications of utilizing paused funds for deportation purposes could also affect public expenditure allocation.

Stakeholder Impact

  • Immigrant Communities: The most direct and profound impact would be on immigrant communities, especially individuals facing deportation. The absence of detailed criteria might lead to arbitrary or unfair deportation practices, raising human rights concerns.

  • Legal and Human Rights Advocates: These groups might challenge the bill due to its perceived expansion of executive power, lack of transparency, and use of insensitive language. They may push for clarity and accountability measures.

  • Government and Legislative Bodies: The bill shifts financial and operational discretion to the executive branch, which could provoke debate regarding the balance of power and the proper scope of executive actions.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to grant the President the capability to use specific funds for deportation, it brings to light crucial issues of oversight, language sensitivity, and transparency that could affect its reception and implementation. Stakeholders and the public may express concerns over its potential impact on immigrant rights, financial stewardship, and the balance of power in the U.S. government.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 2 allows the President to use funds for deportation purposes without specifying any particular limitations or oversight, potentially allowing for unchecked spending. This could lead to significant financial implications and raise concerns about the expansion of executive power without adequate checks and balances.

  • The use of 'illegal aliens' in Section 2 may be considered outdated or insensitive language. This could lead to controversy or misinterpretation, affecting the bill's reception among certain groups and possibly inciting public outcry or legal challenges.

  • There is a lack of clarity in Section 2 on how 'funds paused pursuant to Executive Order 14169' will be identified or quantified, leading to ambiguity in the implementation of this section. This ambiguity could lead to difficulties in executing the bill effectively and create financial oversight challenges.

  • Section 2 does not specify the criteria or process for deportation. This lack of transparency could result in accountability issues and raise ethical concerns about how decisions are made regarding deportation, affecting immigrant communities and potentially leading to human rights challenges.

  • The absence of any reporting requirements or audits in Section 2 to ensure the funds are used appropriately could lead to misuse of funds. This oversight may result in financial inefficiencies and lacks necessary accountability measures that ensure public resources are utilized effectively.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that this Act can be formally referred to as the "Restoring American Sovereignty Act."

2. Use of funds for deportation purposes Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section permits funds that were paused under Executive Order 14169 to be used by the President to deport illegal immigrants from the United States, despite any other existing laws.