Overview
Title
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite geothermal exploration and development in previously studied or developed areas.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 1077 is a new rule to help people find and use hot energy from the Earth more quickly and easily in places they have already looked before. It tries to do this by making the process similar to how they find and use oil and gas.
Summary AI
H. R. 1077 aims to change the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to make it easier and quicker to explore and develop geothermal energy in areas that have already been studied or developed. The bill proposes changes to include geothermal resources under certain parts of the law that currently apply to the exploration and development of oil and gas. This would help speed up geothermal projects by streamlining the environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The bill is also known as the "Streamlining Thermal Energy through Advanced Mechanisms Act" or the "STEAM Act".
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
The bill in question, H.R. 1077, seeks to amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to expedite the exploration and development of geothermal energy in areas that have already been studied or developed. Introduced by Representatives Lee of Nevada and Maloy, this legislative proposal aims to streamline processes related to geothermal resources by amending existing frameworks that primarily address oil and gas. This amendment is encapsulated in what is referred to as the “Streamlining Thermal Energy through Advanced Mechanisms Act” or the “STEAM Act.”
Summary of Significant Issues
One primary issue is the potential environmental impact of geothermal developments. The amended bill incorporates geothermal energy considerations into the scope of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews. However, concerns arise from the bill’s lack of direct attention to environmental impacts specific to geothermal projects. Without explicit environmental considerations, stakeholders focusing on conservation may be apprehensive about expedited processing possibly bypassing thorough assessments.
Another noteworthy concern is the use of technical legal references without sufficient context or explanation, which might be unclear to those not well-versed in legal jargon. This could hinder the understanding of how these amendments practically apply to geothermal development, creating a barrier for public comprehension and involvement.
Additionally, the bill's focus on geothermal resources raises questions about the prioritization of this particular energy source over other renewables like solar and wind. While the geothermal sector stands to benefit from reduced bureaucratic hurdles, the bill’s specific emphasis may spark debates about favoritism and the strategic planning of national energy resources.
Potential Broader Public Impact
If successfully enacted, this legislative change could lead to increased geothermal energy projects, partially driven by reduced administrative delays. For the general public, this could mean a quicker transition towards renewable energy sources, which can play a role in addressing climate change and enhancing energy security. However, without addressing environmental scrutiny, these projects may also pose risks to ecosystems, potentially igniting public resistance in environmentally sensitive areas.
Moreover, the bill could stimulate local economies by generating jobs in geothermal development projects, driving economic activity in areas sitting atop geothermal resources. This could be particularly beneficial for rural and underserved communities.
Impact on Stakeholders
Environmental Groups: They may view the lack of comprehensive environmental safeguards as a significant drawback, potentially leading to opposition campaigns, especially if they feel NEPA’s rigorous environmental assessments are being sidestepped.
Geothermal Industry: The primary beneficiaries of this bill would be companies involved in geothermal energy. An expedited process means reducing overhead costs associated with waiting for project approval and offers a more predictable pathway to development.
Local Communities: In areas with geothermal potential, local governments and residents might see economic growth due to job creation and expanded infrastructure. However, they might also express concerns about environmental impacts or changes to their communities’ character.
Policymakers and Energy Advocates: The bill’s focus on geothermal resources may see mixed reactions, as some might support the diversification of renewable energy, while others question the bill’s prioritization over other forms. The broader policy dialogue may need to take into consideration balancing innovation with sustainable, ecosystem-friendly approaches.
In conclusion, while H.R. 1077 aims to advance geothermal energy, its potential effects on the environment, clarity of legal language, and implications on the energy landscape need comprehensive evaluation to ensure balanced progress.
Issues
In Section 2, the amendment to expedite geothermal exploration and development may raise significant environmental and legal concerns. The absence of explicit consideration for potential environmental impacts related to geothermal development under NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) review could be contentious, especially for stakeholders concerned about environmental preservation.
The amendment in Section 2 could create confusion due to the lack of clarity and context surrounding the legal references '42 U.S.C. 15942' and '30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.' These references may be difficult for the general public to understand without additional explanation.
The short title in Section 1, while clear and concise, does not provide sufficient context regarding the broader implications or specific objectives of the Act, making it challenging to assess its overall impact or potential issues.
The focus on geothermal resource development, as introduced in Section 2, may not adequately address concerns or provide justification for the emphasis on geothermal energy compared to other renewable resources. This could be significant politically and financially due to questions about favoritism or prioritization within the energy sector.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides that the official name of this legislation is the “Streamlining Thermal Energy through Advanced Mechanisms Act,” which may also be referred to as the “STEAM Act.”
2. NEPA Review Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to include geothermal resources in the provisions related to oil and gas, allowing for the exploration or development of geothermal resources under the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970. It modifies the text by adding geothermal resources wherever oil and gas are mentioned in certain parts of the law.