Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish the childcare provider startup credit, to increase the amount of and make refundable the expenses for household and dependent care credit, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 1067 is a plan to help families pay for daycare by giving people money back when they open new childcare services and by giving more money back to families for taking care of kids at home.
Summary AI
The bill H.R. 1067 aims to make changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It proposes the creation of a new tax credit called the "childcare provider startup credit," which would allow qualifying taxpayers to receive a credit of up to 30% of startup expenses for opening childcare services, with a maximum limit of $10,000. Additionally, the bill seeks to enhance the household and dependent care credit by increasing the amount that can be claimed and making it refundable. The changes are intended to assist families with young children or dependents by reducing the overall cost of care, thereby supporting working parents.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the “Lowering Infant and Toddler Tuition for Learning and Education Act of 2025” or the "LITTLE Act of 2025," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish financial incentives for childcare providers and enhance tax credits related to dependent care expenses. It introduces a Childcare Provider Startup Credit allowing qualified taxpayers to claim a tax credit of 30% on their startup childcare expenses. Additionally, it plans to increase and make refundable the credit for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful employment.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the notable issues pertains to the $10,000 aggregate credit limit for startup expenses. This cap may deter larger organizations from investing significantly in childcare services, thus impeding broader efforts to enhance childcare availability.
Another complexity arises from the calculation for the 'applicable percentage', determining the credit for household and dependent care services. The intricate formula could lead to misunderstandings and incorrect tax filings.
Furthermore, there is a restriction on claiming expenses for services outside the taxpayer's household if the qualifying individual stays overnight, which may be too restrictive for some families that rely on overnight care.
The bill also sets identifying information requirements for service providers and qualifying individuals, potentially complicating the tax filing process and increasing the risk of compliance issues.
Additionally, there are provisions where married and unmarried individuals face differing income limitations when claiming credits, raising fairness concerns.
Impacts on the Public
The bill is designed to alleviate some financial burdens associated with childcare and dependent care. It promises to make it easier for families to afford these services, potentially enabling more parents to join the workforce by reducing dependent care constraints.
However, the public may face challenges in navigating the complexities of the amended tax credits, especially in understanding new calculations and filing requirements. Families without access to tax professionals may find it difficult to claim these credits accurately, potentially diminishing the bill's intended benefits.
Impacts on Specific Stakeholders
Families with Children: On the surface, the bill aims to support families with young children by providing financial relief through tax credits. This could especially benefit dual-income households needing childcare. However, single-income or low-income families might find the earned income limitation restrictive, potentially reducing the financial support they can receive.
Childcare Providers: Small-scale childcare providers may find the startup credit beneficial, encouraging them to establish services. Yet, larger providers might be underwhelmed by the $10,000 lifetime credit cap, which may limit long-term growth and improvement plans.
Married versus Unmarried Parents: The different income limitations for married and unmarried individuals could create a sense of inequity, affecting married couples where one partner is not earning an income. As such, this aspect might necessitate future reforms to address fairness concerns.
Overall, the LITTLE Act of 2025 strives to enhance childcare accessibility and affordability through tax incentives but is met with several implementation challenges and potential inequities that could influence its effectiveness and reception among U.S. taxpayers.
Financial Assessment
The bill H.R. 1067 introduces new financial measures intended to provide tax relief and incentivize the establishment of childcare services. Two major financial components are introduced: the childcare provider startup credit and adjustments to the household and dependent care credit.
Childcare Provider Startup Credit
Section 2 outlines the "Childcare Provider Startup Credit." This provision provides a credit of up to 30% of qualified startup expenses for taxpayers opening childcare services. However, it's important to note that there is a ceiling on these credits; they may not exceed $10,000 over all taxable years for any taxpayer. This cap is meant to control the budget of the tax relief provided but raises concerns, especially in Issue 1, where the limit might deter larger organizations from substantial investments needed to develop long-term childcare facilities. These larger investments are crucial for expanding access and improving childcare infrastructure, but with a limitation, the encouragement to do so may be reduced.
Additionally, Issue 4 highlights how the cap might disadvantage larger organizations that provide services to more children, potentially limiting access and affecting broad childcare policy goals. The bill attempts to support small, new entrants into the childcare market but might not address the needs of larger existing operations aiming to expand.
Household and Dependent Care Credit
In Section 3, the bill significantly enhances the household and dependent care credit by making it refundable and adjusting the calculation for how much credit can be claimed. The credit is determined as a percentage of employment-related expenses, starting at 50% and reducing (but not below 35%) with increasing income levels. For every $2,000 increase in a taxpayer's income above $15,000, the percentage reduces by 1 point. However, Issue 2 addresses the complexity of this calculation, which may pose an understanding challenge and lead to potential mistakes in tax filings.
Furthermore, the credit has a dollar limit on expenses: $7,500 if there is one qualifying individual and $15,000 for two or more. These amounts cap how much can be credited back even if actual care expenses are higher, placing a limit on financial support (as mentioned in the Summary). Additionally, there is a specific earned income limitation that could negatively impact low-income families or single earners as discussed in Issue 6, potentially reducing the intended support for those groups most in need.
The bill also includes provisions for adjusting the dollar amounts with inflation, rounded to the nearest multiple of $10, starting with tax years after 2024. However, as Issue 7 suggests, the language around this round-off rule may be unclear, which could complicate future financial planning due to potential uncertainty about how adjustments are calculated.
Additional Concerns
The identification requirements for service providers and qualifying individuals introduced in SEC. 36C might increase the complexity of tax filings. Mistakes in these areas could lead to compliance issues, as noted in Issue 5, potentially penalizing taxpayers unintentionally. The bill’s language should ensure clarity to avoid these issues.
Overall, while the bill's financial measures aim to provide tax relief and support for childcare services, several complexities and limitations could affect its effectiveness and possibly counter its objectives if not addressed.
Issues
The $10,000 aggregate credit limit for childcare provider startup expenses in SEC. 2 might disincentivize larger organizations from making significant, long-term investments in expanding childcare services, which could hinder the development of more robust childcare solutions.
The complexity of the calculation for the 'applicable percentage' in SEC. 36C, subsection (a)(2) for household and dependent care credit might be challenging for individuals to understand, potentially leading to incorrect filings and misinformation about eligibility.
In SEC. 3, the limitation of expenses in section (b)(2)(A) excludes services outside the taxpayer's household if the qualifying individual stays overnight. This could be unfairly restrictive for individuals who rely on overnight care and might need more flexible options for their dependent care needs.
The cap on credits for childcare provider startup expenses in SEC. 45BB could disadvantage larger organizations providing childcare services to more children, potentially limiting access to taxpayers and affecting broader policy goals related to childcare availability.
The requirement for identifying information for service providers and qualifying individuals in SEC. 36C might complicate the tax filing process, with significant consequences for taxpayers making genuine mistakes, thereby increasing the likelihood of compliance issues.
The earned income limitation in SEC. 36C, subsection (d)(1) may disproportionately affect low-income or single-earner families who are in need of dependent care support, potentially limiting the policy's assistance to those most in need.
The round-off rule for inflation adjustment increases in SEC. 36C(e) is somewhat unclear, particularly in how it should be applied in cases where increases are exactly halfway between multiples of $10, possibly obscuring future financial planning for families.
Definitions of 'qualified childcare startup expenses' in SEC. 2 reference 'start-up expenditure' from section 195(c)(1), which might not be clear to all readers or relevant to childcare services, suggesting potential legal ambiguities and implementation challenges.
The differing income limitations for married versus unmarried individuals specified in SEC. 36C could present fairness concerns, especially in cases where one spouse is not actively earning an income.
In SEC. 3, the exception rule for outside household expenses (b)(2)(B) introduces complexity by allowing some expenses based on specific criteria, potentially adding confusion in the application process for families.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides its short title, allowing it to be referred to as the “Lowering Infant and Toddler Tuition for Learning and Education Act of 2025” or simply the “LITTLE Act of 2025.”
2. Childcare provider startup credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill introduces a Childcare Provider Startup Credit, which allows qualified taxpayers to receive a tax credit equal to 30% of their startup expenses for establishing and operating a childcare service. To qualify, a taxpayer must meet specific state or local requirements and provide services to at least two children for a significant portion of the year, with a maximum credit limit of $10,000 over all years, and no double benefits for the same expenses.
Money References
- “(d) Limitation.—The aggregate amount of credits determined under subsection (a) for any taxpayer in all taxable years may not exceed $10,000.
45BB. Childcare provider startup credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section 45BB of the bill provides a tax credit for qualified taxpayers who start childcare services, allowing them to receive a credit equal to 30% of their startup expenses. However, the total credit cannot exceed $10,000, and taxpayers cannot claim this credit if they are already receiving deductions or credits for these expenses under other provisions.
Money References
- (d) Limitation.—The aggregate amount of credits determined under subsection (a) for any taxpayer in all taxable years may not exceed $10,000.
3. Household and dependent care credit increased and made refundable Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section changes the tax code to increase and make refundable a credit for household and dependent care expenses necessary for gainful employment. It defines who qualifies for the credit, sets limits on the amount that can be claimed, and provides guidelines for inflation adjustments and special circumstances, like married couples needing to file jointly to claim the credit.
Money References
- “(2) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘applicable percentage’ means 50 percent reduced (but not below 35 percent) by 1 percentage point for each $2,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income for the taxable year exceeds $15,000.
- “(c) Dollar limit on amount creditable.—The amount of the employment-related expenses incurred during any taxable year which may be taken into account under subsection (a) shall not exceed— “(1) $7,500 if there is 1 qualifying individual with respect to the taxpayer for such taxable year, or “(2) $15,000 if there are 2 or more qualifying individuals with respect to the taxpayer for such taxable year.
- “(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR SPOUSE WHO IS A STUDENT OR INCAPABLE OF CARING FOR HIMSELF.—In the case of a spouse who is a student or a qualifying individual described in subsection (b)(1)(C), for purposes of paragraph (1), such spouse shall be deemed for each month during which such spouse is a full-time student at an educational institution, or is such a qualifying individual, to be gainfully employed and to have earned income of not less than— “(A) $250 if subsection (c)(1) applies for the taxable year, or “(B) $500 if subsection (c)(2) applies for the taxable year.
- “(e) Inflation adjustment.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after 2024, the dollar amounts in this section shall be increased by an amount equal to— “(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by “(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2023’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii).
- “(2) ROUNDING.—If any increase under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10, such increase shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10.
36C. Expenses for household and dependent care services necessary for gainful employment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Individuals with dependents can receive a tax credit for expenses related to household and dependent care services necessary for them to work. The credit is determined by a percentage of these expenses, capped at certain limits based on the number of dependents, with adjustments for inflation and specific rules for married individuals and students.
Money References
- (2) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGE DEFINED.—For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “applicable percentage” means 50 percent reduced (but not below 35 percent) by 1 percentage point for each $2,000 (or fraction thereof) by which the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income for the taxable year exceeds $15,000.
- (D) DEPENDENT CARE CENTER DEFINED.—For purposes of this paragraph, the term “dependent care center” means any facility which— (i) provides care for more than six individuals (other than individuals who reside at the facility), and (ii) receives a fee, payment, or grant for providing services for any of the individuals (regardless of whether such facility is operated for profit). (c) Dollar limit on amount creditable.—The amount of the employment-related expenses incurred during any taxable year which may be taken into account under subsection (a) shall not exceed— (1) $7,500 if there is 1 qualifying individual with respect to the taxpayer for such taxable year, or (2) $15,000 if there are 2 or more qualifying individuals with respect to the taxpayer for such taxable year.
- (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR SPOUSE WHO IS A STUDENT OR INCAPABLE OF CARING FOR HIMSELF.—In the case of a spouse who is a student or a qualifying individual described in subsection (b)(1)(C), for purposes of paragraph (1), such spouse shall be deemed for each month during which such spouse is a full-time student at an educational institution, or is such a qualifying individual, to be gainfully employed and to have earned income of not less than— (A) $250 if subsection (c)(1) applies for the taxable year, or (B) $500 if subsection (c)(2) applies for the taxable year.
- — (1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any taxable year beginning after 2024, the dollar amounts in this section shall be increased by an amount equal to— (A) such dollar amount, multiplied by (B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which the taxable year begins, determined by substituting “calendar year 2023” for “calendar year 2016” in subparagraph (A)(ii).
- (2) ROUNDING.—If any increase under paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10, such increase shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $10. (f) Special rules.—For purposes of this section— (1) PLACE OF ABODE.—An individual shall not be treated as having the same principal place of abode of the taxpayer if at any time during the taxable year of the taxpayer the relationship between the individual and the taxpayer is in violation of local law.