Overview

Title

An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

The bill is about giving a special name, "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building," to a post office in San Bernardino, California, so people know it by that name from now on.

Summary AI

H.R. 1060 is a bill that proposes naming a United States Postal Service facility located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building." This bill instructs that any mention of this facility in official documents or records should now refer to it by this new name.

Published

2024-02-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-02-01
Package ID: BILLS-118hr1060rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
215
Pages:
2
Sentences:
6

Language

Nouns: 89
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 8
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.20
Average Sentence Length:
35.83
Token Entropy:
4.29
Readability (ARI):
19.69

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill, H. R. 1060, proposes to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building." If enacted, this designation means that any official reference to this postal facility in U.S. laws, maps, regulations, or other documents will use the new name.

Significant Issues

Efficient Use of Legislative Time
One of the primary issues raised by this bill is the question of whether Congress should dedicate time and resources to naming federal facilities. While honoring individuals through designations is customary, some might perceive this as an inefficient use of legislative focus, given the numerous pressing issues that Congress faces.

Criteria for Naming
Naming the post office after Dr. Margaret B. Hill raises questions about the selection criteria. Without clear transparency or criteria for choosing honorees, the public may view such designations as arbitrary, potentially favoring certain individuals or groups without reflecting broader public support.

Financial Considerations
The bill does not address potential costs associated with changing the designation, such as updates to signage and official documentation. While these costs may be minor, they represent taxpayer money spent on a symbolic measure. Transparency regarding these financial implications would be prudent to ensure responsible government spending.

Broad Impact on the Public

For the general public, the direct impact of this bill might seem minimal. Renaming a postal facility does not affect postal operations or services. However, such actions can symbolize community recognition and contribute to local pride by honoring individuals who have made significant contributions.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Local Community and Dr. Margaret B. Hill's Supporters
For the community of San Bernardino, and particularly those who hold Dr. Margaret B. Hill in high esteem, this renaming could be a source of pride and recognition for her contributions. It strengthens the community’s identity and connects civic landmarks to local heritage and leaders.

Critics of Legislative Focus
Critics may argue that Congress’s focus on naming a building detracts from addressing more urgent, substantive issues. Those concerned with governmental efficiency might view such measures as distractions.

Government Budget Concerns
Stakeholders with an interest in government spending may be concerned about the financial implications of renaming federal facilities. Even if these costs are minimal, they contribute to the larger dialogue about fiscal responsibility and transparency.

In summary, while the bill reflects a standard legislative practice of recognizing individuals through facility naming, it invites scrutiny on the grounds of legislative efficiency, selection transparency, and financial responsibility. These are important considerations in evaluating the broader implications of such seemingly symbolic legislation.

Issues

  • The act of naming a postal facility could be viewed as an inefficient use of legislative time and resources (Section 1). Given the vast array of issues Congress tackles, dedicating effort to naming a building may not align with priorities of national importance and could be perceived as a misuse of congressional focus.

  • The naming of the post office building after Dr. Margaret B. Hill might favor a particular individual, raising questions about whether this reflects broad public support or political pressures (Section 1). Without transparency on criteria for selection, the public might view the designation as arbitrary, inviting scrutiny.

  • The potential financial implications of changing the designation of the postal facility are not discussed in the bill (Section 1). There are likely costs associated with updating signage, maps, and related documentation, which could result in unnecessary government spending. Addressing such financial considerations would be prudent to ensure accountability and transparency in the use of public funds.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States Postal Service facility at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, will be officially named the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building." Any mention of this location in official US documents will recognize it by this new name.