Overview

Title

An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 1060 is a special law that gives a new name to a post office in San Bernardino, California, calling it the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building", so everyone knows it has a new name.

Summary AI

H. R. 1060 is a bill that officially names the United States Postal Service facility located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the “Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building.” The bill ensures that any reference to this postal facility in legal documents or other records will recognize the new designation. This act was approved by both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Published

2024-11-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: JOINT
Status: Enrolled Bill
Date: 2024-11-21
Package ID: BILLS-118hr1060enr

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
188
Pages:
1
Sentences:
9

Language

Nouns: 75
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 7
Entities: 19

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.07
Average Sentence Length:
20.89
Token Entropy:
4.28
Readability (ARI):
11.66

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, identified as H. R. 1060, seeks to name the United States Postal Service facility located at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, as the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building." This act of naming extends beyond simple identification, as the new designation would apply to all federal references, including laws, maps, regulations, and official documents.

Significant Issues

Several noteworthy issues arise from this legislation:

  1. Legislative Resources: Designating a postal facility through congressional action may appear as an inefficient use of legislative time and resources. Matters involving the operation of postal facilities might generally be addressed at a more localized or administrative level, raising questions about the necessity of involving Congress in this matter.

  2. Cost Considerations: The bill does not discuss potential costs associated with the name change. Altering signage, updating maps, and revising official documents could incur government expenses that the legislation does not address.

  3. Individual Recognition: Naming the facility after Dr. Margaret B. Hill highlights an individual’s contributions or significance. However, the bill does not provide background information on Dr. Hill or context for the choice, which could lead to perceptions of favoritism unless broader public support or reasoning is evident.

  4. Lack of Context: Without specified criteria for choosing Dr. Hill, the rationale for this decision might seem arbitrary. This lack of transparency could impact public perception of fairness and merit in the naming process.

Potential Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The practical implications of this bill for the broader public are relatively minimal. The primary outcome is symbolic, resulting in the recognition of Dr. Hill's contributions or legacy. More broadly, naming public facilities after individuals can inspire community pride or awareness of notable local figures.

Positive Impacts:

  • Community Recognition: For residents of San Bernardino, the naming could foster a sense of pride and recognition for a community figure.
  • Acknowledgment of Contributions: If Dr. Margaret B. Hill significantly impacted the community or relevant field, this could serve as an official acknowledgment of her contributions and inspire future community initiatives.

Negative Impacts:

  • Perception of Resource Allocation: Critics might argue that legislative time and resources could be better spent on more pressing national issues.
  • Potential Cost Concerns: Any associated costs with changing the facility's name might be viewed as unnecessary government spending.

Overall, H. R. 1060 likely aims to honor a respected individual in the San Bernardino community; however, it may benefit from additional context, particularly regarding the reasoning and significance of the renaming decision. Through careful consideration of these factors, the legislation could better justify its place within the broader framework of congressional actions.

Issues

  • The designation of a postal facility might not require congressional action, and could be considered an inefficient use of legislative time and resources. [Section 1]

  • There is no evaluation of potential costs associated with changing the designation of the facility, such as signage, maps, or documents, which could incur unnecessary government spending. [Section 1]

  • The naming of the post office after Dr. Margaret B. Hill could be seen as favoring a particular individual. It might be necessary to assess if this designation reflects broad public support or is warranted. [Section 1]

  • The section does not provide any criteria or reasoning for choosing Dr. Margaret B. Hill for the naming, which could appear as arbitrary without additional context. [Section 1]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The United States Postal Service facility at 1663 East Date Place in San Bernardino, California, will be officially named the "Dr. Margaret B. Hill Post Office Building." Any mention of this location in official US documents will recognize it by this new name.