Overview

Title

To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 10543 wants to keep a program going that helps people who have problems with floods, making sure it lasts until 2025. Even if the program extension is decided after December 20, 2024, it will pretend as if it started working on that date to keep everything smooth.

Summary AI

H.R. 10543, known as the "NFIP Extension Act of 2024," aims to extend the National Flood Insurance Program. Specifically, it changes the expiration date for program financing and the program itself from September 30, 2023, to September 30, 2025. If the bill is passed after December 20, 2024, the changes will still take effect as if they were enacted on that date.

Published

2024-12-20
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-12-20
Package ID: BILLS-118hr10543ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
231
Pages:
2
Sentences:
7

Language

Nouns: 65
Verbs: 17
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 25
Entities: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.03
Average Sentence Length:
33.00
Token Entropy:
4.31
Readability (ARI):
17.11

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, known as the "NFIP Extension Act of 2024," seeks to extend the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by maintaining its financing and postponing its expiration date from September 30, 2023, to September 30, 2025. Introduced by Mr. Garbarino in the House of Representatives, this bill ensures that national flood insurance remains available for another two years. The extension also includes a retroactive element, meaning if the bill is enacted after December 20, 2024, it will still take effect as though it was enacted on that date.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several noteworthy issues:

  1. Date Extension and Financial Alignment: The change of expiration dates extends the program funding and validity, but it needs careful examination to ensure alignment with current and future financial projections. Misalignment could have lasting effects on the program’s sustainability.

  2. Lack of Financial Detail: The bill lacks specifics about the financial implications of the reauthorization changes. This absence might complicate budget planning and resource allocation, which are critical to the program's success and reliability.

  3. Retroactive Effective Date: Including a retroactive effective date may lead to administrative or procedural complexities. If the Act is enacted after December 20, 2024, the legal and operational implications could be significant, potentially creating compliance challenges.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, especially those living in flood-prone areas, this bill provides continuity and reassurance that flood insurance options remain accessible. The extension ensures that homeowners and businesses can continue to protect their properties against flood risks without interruption. However, if the program's financial structures are misaligned due to the lack of detailed planning, it might jeopardize long-term stability. This could lead to potential increases in insurance premiums, potentially affecting affordability for many policyholders.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Homeowners and Property Owners: For those in areas susceptible to flooding, the continuation of the NFIP means sustained access to insurance protection. It ensures that financial relief remains an option after flood incidents, protecting investments and aiding in recovery.

Insurance Providers: Insurers offering policies under the NFIP could benefit from the program's extension due to maintained business consistency. However, the lack of detailed financial implications could lead to challenging adjustments in pricing strategies or coverage options.

Federal and Local Governments: Governments benefit from having an operational flood insurance program, but they must address potential budgetary impacts due to the absence of clear financial provisions. Moreover, governments might face additional administrative burdens with the retroactive enforcement, necessitating effective response strategies to maintain orderly compliance and effectiveness.

In conclusion, while the NFIP Extension Act of 2024 is primarily a procedural step to sustain flood insurance services, its successful implementation and positive impact depend heavily on the resolution of the highlighted issues and thoughtful alignment with financial and operational frameworks.

Issues

  • The amendment to the expiration dates in the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 from September 30, 2023, to September 30, 2025, in Section 2 may require careful review to ensure alignment with current and future financial projections and needs. Any misalignment could impact the program's long-term sustainability. [Section 2]

  • The lack of specific details on financial implications or required appropriations due to the reauthorization changes in Section 2 poses a risk to budget planning and could lead to inadequate funding or resource allocation. [Section 2]

  • The retroactive effective date clause in Section 2(c) might create administrative or procedural complexities, particularly if the bill is enacted after the specified enactment date. This could necessitate a review of its legal and operational impact, potentially creating compliance issues. [Section 2]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act states that it will be known as the "NFIP Extension Act of 2024."

2. Reauthorization Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section reauthorizes parts of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 by extending the financing and program expiration dates from September 30, 2023, to September 30, 2025. Additionally, if the Act is passed after December 20, 2024, the changes will be applied retroactively as if they were made on that date.